BackgroundOnline haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality versus conventional haemodialysis (HD); however, it is not always available. In these situations, a novel class of membranes with a higher pore size, medium cut-off (MCO) dialysers, could be promising. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an MCO dialyser in the removal of small and medium-size molecules and compare it with standard high-flux (HF) dialysers in HD and OL-HDF.MethodsIn this crossover study, 18 prevalent HD patients were studied in three single mid-week dialysis treatments during three consecutive weeks as follows: first week with OL-HDF with a standard HF dialyser, second week with conventional HD with a standard HF dialyser and third week with conventional HD with an MCO dialyser. Reduction ratios (RRs) of different-sized molecules and albumin losses were collected for the different dialysers.ResultsMCO HD provided a greater reduction of middle and larger middle molecules compared with standard HF HD [rate reduction (RR) β2-microglobulin 74.7% versus 69.7%, P=0.01; RR myoglobin 62.5% versus 34.3%, P=0.001; RR prolactin 60% versus 32.8%, P=0.001; RR α1-glycoprotein 2.8% versus −0.1%, P=0.01]. We found no difference in the clearance of small and larger middle molecules comparing MCO HD with OL-HDF. Albumin losses were 0.03  g/session with MCO HD and 3.1  g/session with OL-HDF (P=0.001).ConclusionMCO HD is superior to standard HF HD in the removal of middle and larger middle molecules and it is not inferior to OL-HDF in the clearance of small and larger middle molecules. Thus it could be an alternative in patients in which it is not possible to perform OL-HDF.

The incidence of intradialysis supraventricular arrhythmia was high in our hemodialysis study population. Supraventricular arrhythmias were short, asymptomatic, and self-limiting, and although silent, these arrhythmias were independently associated with mortality and cardiovascular events.

No abstract

Chronic inflammation, protein‐energy wasting, and poor physical functioning are highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). These factors are associated with disability and increase of cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of exercise training during hemodialysis (HD) sessions on physical functioning, body composition, and nutritional and inflammatory status. We performed a prospective intervention study including patients on prevalent HD therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline visit by Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy specialists and the exercise program was adapted to each patient's physical capacity. In addition to demographic, clinical, body composition and functional ability data, serum markers regarding nutritional and inflammatory status were collected at baseline and after 3 months of exercise training. We observed a significant improvement after 3‐month follow‐up in functional ability (6 minute walk test [6MWT] [403.15 ± 105.4 vs 431.81 ± 115.5 m, P < .001], sit‐to‐stand repetitions in 30 seconds [12.2 ± 4.2 vs 14.1 ± 5.0 repetitions, P = .003] and dynamometry [24.5 ± 11.9 vs 29.5 ± 12.5 kg, P < 0.001]), body composition with increase of body mass index (BMI) (23.7 ± 4.4 vs 24.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2, P = 0.01) at the expense of lean tissue index (LTI) (14.9 ± 3.7 vs 16.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2, P = 0.038) and lipid parameters with LDL‐cholesterol decrease (70.2 ± 17.9 vs 64.9 ± 21.3 mg/dL, P = .03) and lower serum triglyceride levels (125.8 ± 54.0 vs 108.2 ± 44.6 mg/dL, P = .006). In addition, we found a decrease in iron (155.6 ± 148.2 vs 116.7 ± 110.8 mg, P = .029) and erythropoietin (117.5 ± 84.2 vs 99.2 ± 74.5 μg, P = .023) requirements. The implementation of exercise training programs during HD can improve physical functioning, body composition and lipid and anemia profile. Supervised exercise programs could be included as part of HD patient care to improve physical capacity in these patients.

BackgroundOverhydration (OH) is associated with mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). A relative overhydration adjusted for extracellular water (OH/ECW) measured by bioimpedance >15% has shown an increased mortality risk in haemodialysis but few studies have been developed in advanced CKD. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of OH on mortality in patients with Stage 4 or 5 non-dialysis CKD.MethodsWe performed a prospective study of 356 patients enrolled in 2011 and followed up until 2016. At baseline we collected general characteristics, serum inflammatory and nutrition markers, cardiovascular events (CVEs) and body composition using bioimpedance spectroscopy. During a median follow-up of 50 (24–66) months we collected mortality data.ResultsThe mean creatinine was 3.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL, median proteinuria was 0.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.2–1.5] g/24 h, median OH was 0.6 (IQR −0.4–1.5) L and mean relative OH (OH/ECW) was 2.3 ± 0.8%. We found that 32% of patients died. The univariate Cox analysis showed an association between mortality and age, diabetes, previous CVEs, Charlson comorbidity index, low albumin and pre-albumin, high C-reactive protein (CRP), low lean tissue and high OH/ECW. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed an association between mortality and age {exp(B) 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0–1.3]; P = 0.001}, Charlson comorbidity index [exp(B) 1.1 (95% CI 1.0–1.2); P = 0.01], CRP [exp(B) 1.1 (95% CI 1.0–1.2); P = 0.04], OH/ECW [exp(B) 3.18 (95% CI 2.09–4.97); P = 0.031] and low lean tissue [exp(B) 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.98); P = 0.002]. Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed higher mortality in patients with OH/ECW >0% (log rank 11.1; P = 0.001).ConclusionAny grade of relative OH measured by OH/ECW >0% is associated with long-term mortality in patients with Stage 4 or 5 non-dialysis CKD.