BRV in broad clinical postmarketing use is a well-tolerated anticonvulsant drug with 50% responder rates, similar to those observed in the regulatory trials, even though 90% of the patients included had previously been exposed to LEV. An immediate switch from LEV to BRV at a ratio of 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible. The only independent significant predictor of efficacy was the start of BRV in patients not currently taking LEV. The occurrence of BAE during previous LEV exposure predicted poor psychobehavioral tolerability of BRV treatment. A switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV-induced BAE.

The available data regarding the use of LCM in SE are promising, with a success rate of 57%. The strength of LCM is the lack of interaction potential and the option for intravenous use in emergency situations requiring rapid uptitration.

To characterise bilateral temporal encephalocele (BTE)-associated epilepsy relative to unilateral temporal encephalocele (UTE)-associated epilepsy as a rare but curable cause of structural epilepsy using demographics, epilepsy status and imaging findings. Method: In this single-centre retrospective study we included all patients from June 2015 to August 2018, who suffered from epilepsy and were diagnosed with a temporal encephalocele. Data were systematically collected and analysed for differences between BTE and UTE. Results: Seventeen epilepsy patients diagnosed with temporal encephaloceles (TE) were identified. One-third exhibited BTE. The age of epilepsy onset was higher in patients with BTE compared to UTE (median 51 vs. 37 years, p = 0.074). Latency between epilepsy diagnosis and definitive TE diagnosis differed considerably with a median five-fold shorter duration for the BTE-group when compared to the UTE-group (2-10 years, p = 0.02). Five of seven (81%) patients with BTE were pharmacoresistant, while this applied to only five out of ten (50%) patients with a UTE. Conclusion: When compared to UTE-associated epilepsy, BTE-associated epilepsy is characterised by a later age at onset, shorter delay in TE diagnosis and more frequent drug-resistance. As epilepsy surgery is a valid treatment option for both syndromes, a standardised diagnostic workup should be implemented for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients with unknown aetiology to facilitate early detection of UTE and BTE.

No abstract

Lacosamide (LCM) is approved for anticonvulsive treatment in focal epilepsy and exhibits its function through the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs). LCM shows comparable efficacy with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed in the last decade: in three randomized placebo-controlled trials, significant median seizure reduction rates of 35.2% for 200 mg/day, 36.4-39% for 400 mg/day and 37.8-40% for 600 mg/day were reported. Likewise, 50% responder rates were 38.3-41.1% for 400 mg/day and 38.1-41.2% for 600 mg/day. Similar rates were reported in post-marketing studies. The main adverse events (AEs) are dizziness, abnormal vision, diplopia and ataxia. Overall, LCM is well tolerated and has no clinically-relevant drug-drug interactions. Due to the drug's intravenous availability, its use in status epilepticus (SE) is increasing, and the available data are promising.