Three different central auditory skills were compared and evaluated in 56 blind and 40 sighted subjects. The study consisted of three experiments conducted in three subgroups. Experiment A was performed in order to evaluate the localization function; experiment B for the temporal auditory resolution ability of the blind adult, and experiment C to test the ability of the blind person to discriminate speech material in noise. In all three experiments the blind subjects obtained significantly better results than the sighted subjects. From these results it was concluded that there is supporting evidence of a certain superiority of the blind individual with regard to central auditory function.

This paper examines the psychological and psychophysiological effects of blue light exposure — as compared to red light exposure — on older adults during the day. The blue lighting was found to be significantly more activating and more unpleasant than the red lighting. The mid-frequency high-frequency ratio of the heart period variability slightly decreased under blue lighting indicating an increase of parasympathetic modulation in this lighting condition compared to red lighting.

15581 Background: We studied the acute ototoxic effect of cisplatin in testicular cancer patients with two highly sensitive new methods for detecting high frequency hearing loss: distorsion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). Methods: Checking the acute effect, 32 (63 ears) testicular cancer patients (median age: 33 years, range: 16–59 years) were measured on the first day of their first cycle and after one week of their last cycle of cisplatin treatment. 20 mg/m2 cisplatin was administered for five days, in BEP chemotherapy regimen. The patients got on the average 2.19 cycles (2–3 cycles). We also measured the SOAE of ten healthy control persons (without chemotherapy) matching sex and age distribution of this group. A detailed medical history evaluated audiological risk factors and hearing problems. Tympanometry, DPOAE and SOAE were measured, to detect the acute changes in the inner ear after low cumulative dose of cisplatin treatment. Paired t-test, and sign test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The DPOAE did not show any changes close after cisplatin treatment (average: 2.19 cycles, 2–3 cycles), similarly to our earlier results with pure tone audiometry (PTA) and transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TOAE). But the SOAE showed significant, early changes in incidence, shape and amplitude, in the treated group. 66% of the SOAE changed after treatment (p=0,006). In the control group (20 ears) the SOAE never changed in a three months period. (It behaves as a fingerprint) Conclusions: DPOAE did not change significantly after 2 or 3 cycles of cisplatin treatment, similarly to our earlier results with PTA, and TOAE, but the change of the SOAE-incidence, shape and amplitude close after cisplatin treatment shows acute changes in the inner ear function (first described in the literature) after administration of low cumulative dose of cisplatin. This case is the first indication of the possible clinical relevance of SOAE. Our observation has to be confirmed in further studies, with larger number of patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.