The core of DNA polymerase III, the replicative polymerase in Escherichia coli, consists of three subunits (alpha, epsilon, and theta). The epsilon subunit is the 3'-5' proofreading exonuclease that associates with the polymerase (alpha) through its C-terminal region and theta through a 185-residue N-terminal domain (epsilon 186). A spectrophotometric assay for measurement of epsilon activity is described. Proteins epsilon and epsilon 186 and the epsilon 186.theta complex catalyzed the hydrolysis of the 5'-p-nitrophenyl ester of TMP (pNP-TMP) with similar values of k(cat) and K(M), confirming that the N-terminal domain of epsilon bears the exonuclease active site, and showing that association with theta has little direct effect on the chemistry occurring at the active site of epsilon. On the other hand, formation of the complex with theta stabilized epsilon 186 by approximately 14 degrees C against thermal inactivation. For epsilon 186, k(cat) = 293 min(-)(1) and K(M) = 1.08 mM at pH 8.00 and 25 degrees C, with a Mn(2+) concentration of 1 mM. Hydrolysis of pNP-TMP by epsilon 186 depended absolutely on divalent metal ions, and was inhibited by the product TMP. Dependencies on Mn(2+) and Mg(2+) concentrations were examined, giving a K(Mn) of 0.31 mM and a k(cat) of 334 min(-1) for Mn(2+) and a K(Mg) of 6.9 mM and a k(cat) of 19.9 min(-1) for Mg(2+). Inhibition by TMP was formally competitive [K(i) = 4.3 microM (with a Mn(2+) concentration of 1 mM)]. The pH dependence of pNP-TMP hydrolysis by epsilon 186, in the pH range of 6.5-9.0, was found to be simple. K(M) was essentially invariant between pH 6.5 and 8.5, while k(cat) depended on titration of a single group with a pK(a) of 7.7, approaching limiting values of 50 min(-1) at pH <6.5 and 400 min(-1) at pH >9.0. These data are used in conjunction with crystal structures of the complex of epsilon 186 with TMP and two Mn(II) ions bound at the active site to develop insights into the mechanisms of pNP-TMP hydrolysis by epsilon at high and low pH values.

Based on the prediction that histone lysine demethylases may contain the JmjC domain, we examined the methylation patterns of five knock-out strains (ecm5⌬, gis1⌬, rph1⌬, jhd1⌬, and jhd2⌬ (yjr119c⌬)) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mass spectrometry (MS) analyses of histone H3 showed increased modifications in all mutants except ecm5⌬. High-resolution MS was used to unequivocally differentiate trimethylation from acetylation in various tryptic fragments. The relative abundance of specific fragments indicated that histones K36me3 and K4me3 accumulate in rph1⌬ and jhd2⌬ strains, respectively, whereas both histone K36me2 and K36me accumulate in gis1⌬ and jhd1⌬ strains. Analyses performed with strains overexpressing the JmjC proteins yielded changes in methylation patterns that were the reverse of those obtained in the complementary knock-out strains. In vitro enzymatic assays confirmed that the JmjC domain of Rph1 specifically demethylates K36me3 primarily and K36me2 secondarily. Overexpression of RPH1 generated a growth defect in response to UV irradiation. The demethylase activity of Rph1 is responsible for the phenotype. Collectively, in addition to Jhd1, our results identified three novel JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases and their sites of action in budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Furthermore, the methodology described here will be useful for identifying histone demethylases and their target sites in other organisms.The covalent modification of histones plays a pivotal role in the epigenetic control of gene expression (1). Histone methylation, which occurs on the side chains of lysine and arginine and is most prominent in histones H3 and H4, is linked to transcriptional activation, differentiation, imprinting, and X inactivation (2-4). In general, histone methylation at H3-K4, H3-K36, and H3-K79 is associated with euchromatin and gene activation, whereas histone methylation at H3-K9, H3-K27, and H4-K20 is associated with heterochromatin and repressed genes. Lysine may be mono-, di-, or trimethylated, where the degree of modification is likely related to different biological events. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, histone H3 lysines Lys-4, Lys-36, and Lys-79 are methylated to differing degrees by histone methyltransferases Set1, Set2, and Dot1, respectively (5-8). Although methylation of these sites has been suggested to be a marker of active transcription (9), it may also play critical roles in silencing and DNA damage responses (6, 7, 10, 11).The above site-specific histone methyltransferases have been studied for a number of years. It was believed that histone methylation was stable and irreversible. However, emerging evidence has shown that histone methylation is dynamic (12, 13), which suggests that there are histone demethylases. The 2004 landmark discovery by Shi et al. (14) of human amine oxidase LSD1, the first unequivocal histone demethylase, demonstrates that histone methylation is indeed reversible. LSD1 demethylates mono-and dimethylated H3-K4 or H3-K9 (14 -16), and its homologu...

Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (AnPRT, EC 2.4.2.18) is a homodimeric enzyme that catalyzes the reaction between 5'-phosphoribosyl 1'-pyrophosphate (PRPP) and anthranilate, as part of the tryptophan biosynthesis pathway. Here we present the results of the first chemical screen for inhibitors against Mycobacterium tuberculosis AnPRT (Mtb-AnPRT), along with crystal structures of Mtb-AnPRT in complex with PRPP and several inhibitors. Previous work revealed that PRPP is bound at the base of a deep cleft in Mtb-AnPRT and predicted two anthranilate binding sites along the tunnel leading to the PRPP binding site. Unexpectedly, the inhibitors presented here almost exclusively bound at the entrance of the tunnel, in the presumed noncatalytic anthranilate binding site, previously hypothesized to have a role in substrate capture. The potencies of the inhibitors were measured, yielding Ki values of 1.5-119 μM, with the strongest inhibition displayed by a bianthranilate compound that makes hydrogen bond and salt bridge contacts with Mtb-AnPRT via its carboxyl groups. Our results reveal how the substrate capture mechanism of AnPRT can be exploited to inhibit the enzyme's activity and provide a scaffold for the design of improved Mtb-AnPRT inhibitors that may ultimately form the basis of new antituberculosis drugs with a novel mode of action.

Myxovirus resistance (Mx) proteins restrict replication of numerous viruses. They are closely related to membrane-remodeling fission GTPases, such as dynamin. Mx proteins can tubulate lipids and form rings or filaments that may interact directly with viral structures. GTPase domain dimerization is thought to allow crosstalk between the rungs of a tubular or helical assembly, facilitating constriction. We demonstrate that the GTPase domain of MxA dimerizes to facilitate catalysis, in a fashion analogous to dynamin. GTP binding is associated with the lever-like movement of structures adjacent to the GTPase domain, while GTP hydrolysis returns MxA to its resting state. Dimerization is not significantly promoted by substrate binding and occurs only transiently, yet is central to catalytic efficiency. Therefore, we suggest dimerization functions to coordinate the activity of spatially adjacent Mx molecules within an assembly, allowing their mechanical power strokes to be synchronized at key points in the contractile cycle.