ObjectiveTo determine the performance of direct funduscopy (DF) as part of the initial clinical assessment among different faculty physicians and residents from internal medicine, emergency medicine, and neurology (N).MethodsRetrospective study of 163 randomly reviewed charts of patients (>18 years) presenting either to the ED, inpatient units, or outpatient clinics from January 2001 to July 2013, with corresponding ICD-9 codes for headaches, altered mental status, and visual changes.ResultsAlthough the Neurology Service was the one who performed most DF upon initial evaluation, DF is infrequently done throughout services independent of inpatient or outpatient location. Two thirds of the patients (66%) presenting with visual symptoms had evaluation done by Ophthalmology, which in some instances contributed to the final diagnosis.ConclusionA more robust teaching of DF should be included among the basic clinical competencies during Medical School and Neurology Residency training.

We report a case of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis (MS) followed shortly thereafter by the diagnosis of an oligoastrocytoma. The complexity of diagnosis and management of concomitant presence of tumefactive MS and glial cell tumors is discussed.

No abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability among older adults and more than half of stroke survivors have some residual neurological impairment. Traditionally, managing the aftermath of stroke has been by the implementation of several physical and language therapy modalities. The limitations of these rehabilitation efforts have sparked an interest in finding other ways to enhance neurological recovery. Some of these novel approaches have included pharmacological interventions, cell-derived treatments, and cortical magnetic stimulation. Mounting evidence over the last 2 decades suggests that pharmacological manipulations may have the potential to modulate practice-dependent neuroplasticity and potentially improve neurological recovery after stroke. Multiple pharmacological agents with different mechanisms of action have been evaluated, showing conflicting results. Some studies suggest some promise, yet the quality of the available studies is suboptimal overall, with most of the studies being underpowered. So far, the most promising agents include the antidepressants for motor recovery and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for aphasia. However, large, well-designed clinical trials are needed to address the shortcomings of the available data and before any pharmacological agent can be recommended for routine use as part of the standard algorithm of stroke management.

No abstract

INTRODUCTION: An ED-based “stroke code” demands timely decision making and prioritization of tasks by the stroke team neurologist while coordinating care with ED staff, radiology and pharmacists. Simulation-based medical education (SBME) focuses on obtaining clinical skills belonging to the psychomotor, cognitive and affective domains. SBME is superior to the traditional style of medical education and has shown improved outcomes of knowledge, skills and behaviors and moderate effects for patient-related outcomes in other emergency based scenarios including ACLS and procedure-based learning. HYPOTHESIS: To describe the rationale and design for a novel hospital based stroke simulation. SBME can improve stroke code efficiency particularly for inexperienced stroke team members. METHODS: Six incoming PG2 neurology residents participated in a pilot study using a high fidelity patient simulation of an acute ED-based stroke code at week 1 and 3 of orientation. The trainee independently managed every step from activation of the stroke pager including a focused patient assessment, ordering and interpreting labs and imaging, managing common obstacles, staffing with the on-call attending, working with ancillary staff and appropriate treatment as indicated. Residents completed an affective survey, pre- and post-test cognitive assessment and debriefing with feedback, as well as real time checklist and review of videotaped assessment of their performance. RESULTS: Subjects showed a 16.1% improvement in the cognitive assessment from week 1 to week 3 (p=0.02). The affective survey showed residents were moderate to highly confident in their ability to perform a history and physical prior to participation, yet they had low confidence utilizing the NIHSS and managing medications for acute stroke in the ED prior to participation. CONCLUSION: SBME can facilitate the acquisition of technical and non-technical skills such as leadership, team work, communication, situational awareness, decision-making, cognizance of personal limitations important for patient safety and a learning cycle of debriefing and feedback. Post-test and affective survey results demonstrate improvements in the cognitive domain and resident confidence respectively.