The characteristics of large bowel cancer in young Egyptian patients do not differ significantly from those in older patients. Despite the high incidence of large bowel cancer in young Egyptian patients, family history and pathologic features of tumors do not support a hereditary origin of colorectal cancer in this age group in Egypt.
The treatment of high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano is quite challenging and there is no consensus on the most favourable surgical approach or standardized technique [1]. This is mainly due to the involvement of a greater portion of the sphincter complex in the fistula tract when compared with simple fistulas. Therefore, when choosing the appropriate approach priority should be given to achieving a low recurrence rate and maintaining continence.Many sphincter-sparing procedures have been reported to achieve this delicate balance between recurrence and sphincter integrity. For example, ligation of the intersphincteric tract (LIFT), fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC), video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) and the use of advancement flaps and seton have been used in treatment of high tran-sphincteric fistula-in-ano [2][3][4][5].
Purpose Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, a wide between-country variation was observed regarding in-hospital mortality and its predictors. Given the scarcity of local research and the need to prioritize the provision of care, this study was conducted aiming to measure the incidence of in-hospital COVID-19 mortality and to develop a simple and clinically applicable model for its prediction. Methods COVID-19-confirmed patients admitted to the designated isolation areas of Ain-Shams University Hospitals (April 2020–February 2021) were included in this retrospective cohort study (n = 3663). Data were retrieved from patients’ records. Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard regression were used. Binary logistic regression was used for creating mortality prediction models. Results Patients were 53.6% males, 4.6% current smokers, and their median age was 58 (IQR 41–68) years. Admission to intensive care units was 41.1% and mortality was 26.5% (972/3663, 95% CI 25.1–28.0%). Independent mortality predictors—with rapid mortality onset—were age ≥ 75 years, patients’ admission in critical condition, and being symptomatic. Current smoking and presence of comorbidities particularly, obesity, malignancy, and chronic haematological disorders predicted mortality too. Some biomarkers were also recognized. Two prediction models exhibited the best performance: a basic model including age, presence/absence of comorbidities, and the severity level of the condition on admission (Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) = 0.832, 95% CI 0.816–0.847) and another model with added International Normalized Ratio (INR) value (AUC = 0.842, 95% CI 0.812–0.873). Conclusion Patients with the identified mortality risk factors are to be prioritized for preventive and rapid treatment measures. With the provided prediction models, clinicians can calculate mortality probability for their patients. Presenting multiple and very generic models can enable clinicians to choose the one containing the parameters available in their specific clinical setting, and also to test the applicability of such models in a non-COVID-19 respiratory infection.
Bachground the principal advantages of this approach are a more precise diagnosis of appendicitis, reduction in post-operative pain, fewer superficial-surgical-site infection, earlier return to normal activity and reduction of the duration of hospital stay. Purpose to assess the preoperative patient and surgery risk factors that increase the likelihood of conversion of a laparoscopic appendectomy to an open Appendectomy in Egyptian patients. Patients and Methods this study was conducted in El Demerdash Hospital; Ain shams University, from December 2017 to June 2018. The study was conducted on 30 patients with suspected appendicitis. Results there were 30 patients identified who underwent an initial laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis. The age range was from 18 to 52 years. The Female to Male ratio was 19:11. Of the 30 initial LA, 9 cases were converted to OA (30%). Conclusion surgeon can initiate open appendectomy or aim to have a low threshold of conversion if any of the above mention risk factors present in combination.
Background Exploratory laparotomy remains one of the common operations across the surgical disciplines. As such, the systematic and safe closure of such a laparotomy wound is the key to reduce the postoperative morbidity like wound pain, wound infection and incisional hernia. Objective To compare mass closure & Hughes repair in emergency laparotomy as regard intraoperative technique, operation time, incidence of complication as wound infection, dehiscence, burst abdomen and incisional hernia. Patients and Methods This is a prospective comparative study between two types of closure, mass closure and hughes repair in emergency laparotomies. This study was conducted at Ain-Shams University Emergency Hospitals. Patients who underwent emergency laprotomy from September 2017 to March 2018 and the patients were followed up postoperatively for six months. All patients who underwent emergency laparotomy at Ain-Shams University Emergency Hospitals from September 2017 to March 2018 were chosen according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results In this study we used the same suture and materials” Polydioxanone PDS loop 1”. The comparative study included several items to discuss starting from the time of the technique in our study it ranged from 12 -19 minutes in the conventional method “Mass closure” and it ranged from 24-31 minutes in the huge repair group. It was observed that the length of the laprotomy incision determine the time of the technique. The overall operative time of mass closure group was shorter than the hughe repair technique Conclusion It was observed that there were major factors that affected the results such as the reason for the laparotomy and the general condition of the patient especially the chest condition, diabetes mellitus, serum albumin, anemia and the body mass index.
Background Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with an incidence ranging from 5%-7%. Of all groin hernias, around 75% are inguinal hernias. Recently with advancement in laparoscopy, endoscopic repairs seem to offer better quality of life, decreasing hospital stay and early return to work. Aim of the Work To compare between self fixating mesh and non self fixating mesh in laproscopic inguinal hernia repair transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach as regards intraoperative time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity and incidence of recurrence. Patients and Methods This study was conducted on 30 adult patients presenting with inguinal hernias. They were divided into 2 equal groups of 15 patients each. The first group (A): includes fifteen patients and was operated upon by a Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty technique using self -gripping (SGM group) (Parietex ProGrip] Laparoscopic (PPL) meshes), while the second group (B): includes fifteen patients and were operated upon by a Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty technique with non-self fixating mesh. Results The postoperative pain assessment at 24 hours and 4 weeks shows that the mean VAS score for GROUP A was (3.70 ± 1.72) and for GROUP B (3.90 ± 1.25) while after 1 month duration follow up, the mean VAS score was (1.25 ± 0.79) for Group A and (1.20 ± 0.77) for Group B with no difference between the two groups confirming the atraumatic nature of the self gripping mesh. Conclusion After this comparative study, both mesh fixation with absorpable tacks and fixation using SGM approaches are similarly effective in terms of operative time, the incidence of recurrence, complications and chronic pain coinciding with all the available literature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.