Güran, Aysun (Dogus Author) -- Conference full title: 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) = 2014 22. Sinyal İşleme ve İletişim Uygulamaları Kurultayı (SİU): 23-25 April 2014, Trabzon, Turkey.Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir dokümandaki en önemli cümleleri seçerek ilgili dokümanın özetini çıkarmaktır. Bu amaçla 15 farklı cümle seçim metodu kullanılmıştır. Bu metotlar, 15 kadın ve 15 erkek olmak üzere, toplam 30 kişi tarafından çıkarılmış özet dokümanlarının oluşturduğu bir değerlendirme veri seti üzerinde kıyaslanmıştır. Ayrıca, bu metotlardan en başarılı olanlarının birlikte kullanılması ile elde edilen farklı özellik gruplarının başarım değerleri sergilenmiş ve analiz sonuçları paylaşılmıştır.The aim of this work is to create text summaries by selecting the most important sentences of documents. For this aim 15 sentence selection methods are used. These methods are compared on the evaluation set created by 15 women and 15 men evaluators. The performance results of the systems that are obtained by using different sentence selecetion methods together are also analyzed and the results are shared
There are various machine learning algorithms for extracting patterns from data; but recently, decision combination has become popular to improve accuracy over single learner systems. The fundamental idea behind combining the decisions of an ensemble of classifiers is that different classifiers most probably misclassify different patterns and by suitably combining the decisions of complementary classifiers, accuracy can be improved. In this paper, we investigate two kinds of classifier systems which are capable of estimating how much to weight each base classifier dynamically; during the calculation of the overall output for a given test data instance: (1) In "referee-based system", a referee is associated with each classifier which learns the area of expertise of its associated classifier and weights it accordingly.(2) However, "gating system" learns to partition the input space among all classifiers. Each referee in referee-based system learns a two-class problem (i.e., whether to use or not to use a classifier) whereas a gating system learns an L-class problem assigning the input to one of L base classifiers. Our analysis on 20 datasets from different domains and a classifier pool including 21 base learning algorithms reveals that the gating system tends to concentrate on a few of the base classifiers whereas a use of referees leads to a more balanced use of the base classifiers. Moreover, in the case of referees, it is better to use a small subset of base classifiers, instead of a single one. The study shows that, by using well-trained selection unit (referee or gating), we can get as high accuracy as using all the base classifiers (to combine their decisions) with drastic decrease in the number of base classifiers used, and also improve accuracy. The improvement is significant especially in cases when none of the base classifiers has high accuracy and it indicates that selecting classifiers appears promising as a means of solving hard learning problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.