The posterior spinal element, specifically the pedicle is not uncommonly involved in spinal TB. Pedicle involvement is part of the disease process and usually associated with relatively severe vertebral body and disc destruction, wide prevertebral abscess, and severe kyphosis. Pedicle involvement can be detected early from MRI and need to be documented as it may influence the treatment strategy.
Laminoplasty may produce larger canal expansion at the lower cervical spine compared to the upper cervical area; therefore, the outcomes of those who have predominantly higher cervical myelopathy were inferior to those who have lower cervical myelopathy.
The isthmus endosteal width in >50% of the pedicles studied were less than 3.0 mm. We conclude that transpedicular fixation in the thoracic spine using pedicle screw of >3.0 mm diameter is not feasible in children and adolescents of <18 years old in our population.
Background
the CBT for placing lumbar pedicle screws is a technique used to improve fixation during instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine. In comparison with traditional trajectory (TT) for pedicle screws, CBT screws (otherwise known as pars screws or cortical screws) have a more medial starting point and are aimed in a medial to lateral, caudal to cranial direction. First reported in 2009 as a method to increase the purchase of lumbar pedicle screws within bone.(1)
Aim of the Work
to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether traditional Pedicles Screw Fixation (PS Fx) or Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation (CBT Fx); has been successful for the treatment and fixation of lumbar spine in adult patients with degenerative and traumatic spine disorders; and to compare the 2 techniques to identify risk factor for unfavorable outcome through the recent researches about that issue.
Methodology
this review was done using standard methodology outlined in the Cochrane Handbook and reported the findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines.
Results
meta-analysis study showed that; Successful fusion rate in fixed and random-effects models were (92.24% respectively); in SP group.Successful fusion rate in fixed and random-effects models were (92.44% respectively); in CBT group.Fixed and random-effects models showed non-significant difference in successful fusion rate; between the 2 groups of studies (p > 0.05).
We calculated safety for each technique through post-operative (failed fusion rate).
Conclusion
Although there were insignificant p-values in the most of the comparative items but the CBT showed lower average of intraoperative blood loss, operation time and higher average of decrease in VAS & increase in ODI, slightly higher fusion rate in comparison with PS. So we recommend, the use of CBT as an acceptable alternative of PS in lumbar spine fixation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.