<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Real-world management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucially challenging in the current rapidly evolving clinical environment which includes the need for respecting patient preferences and autonomy. In this context, regional/national treatment guidelines nuanced to local demographics have increasing importance in guiding disease management. We report here real-world data on clinical outcomes in HCC from a validation of the Consensus Guidelines for HCC at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS). <b><i>Method:</i></b> We evaluated the NCCS guidelines using prospectively collected real-world data, comparing the efficacy of treatment received using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment outcomes were also independently evaluated against 2 external sets of guidelines, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) and Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall treatment compliance to the NCCS guidelines was 79.2%. Superior median OS was observed in patients receiving treatment compliant with NCCS guidelines for early (nonestimable vs. 23.5 months <i>p</i> < 0.0001), locally advanced (28.1 vs. 22.2 months <i>p</i> = 0.0216) and locally advanced with macrovascular invasion (10.3 vs. 3.3 months <i>p</i> = 0.0013) but not for metastatic HCC (8.1 vs. 6.8 months <i>p</i> = 0.6300), but PFS was similar. Better clinical outcomes were seen in BCLC C patients who received treatment compliant with NCCS guidelines than in patients with treatment only allowed by BCLC guidelines (median OS 14.2 vs. 7.4 months <i>p</i> = 0.0002; median PFS 6.1 vs. 4.0 months <i>p</i> = 0.0286). Clinical outcomes were, however, similar for patients across all HKLC stages receiving NCCS-recommended treatment regardless of whether their treatment was allowed by HKLC. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The high overall compliance rate and satisfactory clinical outcomes of patients managed according to the NCCS guidelines confirm its validity. This validation using real-world data considers patient and treating clinician preferences, thus providing a realistic analysis of the usefulness of the NCCS guidelines when applied in the clinics.
443 Background: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 (Y90) is preferentially used in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) B or C cohort. However, the BCLC B cohort has a wide heterogeneity. To address this, Bolondi et al. proposed a BCLC B subclassification system. Additionally, the BCLC C cohort is also diverse in their Child-Pugh (CP) stage and extent of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of these subclassifications on survival outcomes has not been studied in HCC patients treated using SIRT. Methods: 392 HCC patients treated using SIRT from 1st January 2008 to 17th March 2017 were analyzed. These patients were classified according to the proposed subclassification system for the BCLC B cohort, and CP stage for the BCLC C cohort, and their survival outcomes reviewed. Results: 293 patients met the study’s inclusion criteria. For B1/B2/B3/B4/ C CP-A and C CP-B, the median OS was 48.3/28.7/14.4/13.7/12.8 and 6.6 months respectively. Overall comparison between the subgroups for median OS reached statistical significance (p < 0.001). The Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis found that tumour location defined as unilobar or bilobar disease significantly influenced median OS. In the BCLC C cohort, the extent of portal vein invasion significantly influenced median OS (p < 0.001). For the BCLC C CP-A group, median OS for segmental/sectoral branch invasion, right and/or left portal vein invasion and main portal vein trunk invasion was 24.1, 12.8 and 6.5 months respectively. Conclusions: Bolondi et al.’s subclassification system optimizes prognostic prediction by reducing the clinical heterogeneity in BCLC B HCC patients treated using SIRT. However tumour location, unaccounted for in the proposed subclassification, is also an important prognosticator. For the BCLC C cohort CP stage, extent of PVT, and tumour location were important predictors of treatment outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.