We modeled the radio non-detection of two Type Ia supernovae (SNe) 2011fe and 2014J considering synchrotron emission from the interaction between SN ejecta and the circumstellar medium. For an ejecta with the outer part having a power law density structure we compare synchrotron emission with radio observations. Assuming that 20% of the bulk shock energy is being shared equally between electrons and magnetic fields we found a very low density medium around both the SNe. A less tenuous medium with particle density ∼ 1 cm −3 , which could be expected around both SNe, can be estimated when the magnetic field amplification is less than that presumed for energy equipartition. This conclusion also holds if the progenitor of SN 2014J was a rigidly rotating white dwarf (WD) with a main sequence (MS) or red giant companion. For a He star companion, or a MS for SN 2014J, with 10% and 1% of bulk kinetic energy in magnetic fields, we obtain a mass loss rate < 10 −9 and <∼ 4 × 10 −9 M ⊙ yr −1 for a wind velocity of 100 km s −1 . The former requires a mass accretion efficiency > 99% onto the WD, but is less restricted for the latter case. However, if the tenuous medium is due to a recurrent nova it is difficult from our model to predict synchrotron luminosities. Although the formation channels of SNe 2011fe and 2014J are not clear, the null detection in radio wavelengths could point toward a low amplification efficiency for magnetic fields in SN shocks.

We present high-cadence optical and ultraviolet light curves of the normal Type Ia supernova (SN) 2021aefx, which shows an early bump during the first two days of observation. This bump may be a signature of interaction between the exploding white dwarf and a nondegenerate binary companion, or it may be intrinsic to the white dwarf explosion mechanism. In the case of the former, the short duration of the bump implies a relatively compact main-sequence companion star, although this conclusion is viewing-angle dependent. Our best-fit companion-shocking and double-detonation models both overpredict the UV luminosity during the bump, and existing nickel-shell models do not match the strength and timescale of the bump. We also present nebular spectra of SN 2021aefx, which do not show the hydrogen or helium emission expected from a nondegenerate companion, as well as a radio nondetection that rules out all symbiotic progenitor systems and most accretion disk winds. Our analysis places strong but conflicting constraints on the progenitor of SN 2021aefx; no current model can explain all of our observations.

We present the results of Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) band 3 observations of the nearby type Ic supernova (SN) 2020oi. Under the standard assumptions on the SN-circumstellar medium (CSM) interaction and the synchrotron emission, the data indicate that the CSM structure deviates from a smooth distribution expected from the steady-state mass loss in the very vicinity of the SN (≲1015 cm), which is then connected to the outer smooth distribution (≳1016 cm). This structure is further confirmed through the light-curve modeling of the whole radio data set as combined with the previously reported data at lower frequency. Because this is an explosion of a bare carbon-oxygen (C+O) star with a fast wind, we can trace the mass-loss history of the progenitor of SN 2020oi in the final year. The inferred nonsmooth CSM distribution corresponds to fluctuations on the subyear timescale in the mass-loss history toward the SN explosion. Our finding suggests that the pre-SN activity is likely driven by the accelerated change in the nuclear burning stage in the last moments just before the massive star’s demise. The structure of the CSM derived in this study is beyond the applicability of the other methods at optical wavelengths, highlighting the importance and uniqueness of quick follow-up observations of SNe by ALMA and other radio facilities.