No abstract

Background: Text messaging has successfully supported smoking cessation. This study compares a mobile application with text messaging to support smoking cessation. Materials and Methods: Young adult smokers 18-30 years old (n = 102) participated in a randomized pretest-posttest trial. Smokers received a smartphone application (REQ-Mobile) with short messages and interactive tools or a text messaging system (onQ), managed by an expert system. Selfreported usability of REQ-Mobile and quitting behavior (quit attempts, point-prevalence, 30-day point-prevalence, and continued abstinence) were assessed in posttests. Results: Overall, 60% of smokers used mobile services (REQ-Mobile, 61%, mean of 128.5 messages received; onQ, 59%, mean of 107.8 messages), and 75% evaluated REQ-Mobile as user-friendly. A majority of smokers reported being abstinent at posttest (6 weeks, 53% of completers; 12 weeks, 66% of completers [44% of all cases]). Also, 37% (25%of all cases) reported 30-day point-prevalence abstinence, and 32% (22% of all cases) reported continuous abstinence at 12 weeks. OnQ produced more abstinence (p < 0.05) than REQ-Mobile. Use of both services predicted increased 30-day abstinence at 12 weeks (used, 47%; not used, 20%; p = 0.03). Conclusions: REQ-Mobile was feasible for delivering cessation support but appeared to not move smokers to quit as quickly as text messaging. Text messaging may work better because it is simple, well known, and delivered to a primary inbox. These advantages may disappear as smokers become more experienced with new handsets. Mobile phones may be promising delivery platforms for cessation services using either smartphone applications or text messaging.

A content analysis of cancer news coverage in a sample of local and national newspapers, television, and magazines was conducted for the years 2002 and 2003. Analyses compared proportions of mentions of cancer sites with proportional contribution to cancer incidence and mortality based on available epidemiological estimates. Analyses also examined relative attention provided to prevention, detection, treatment, causes and outcomes of various cancers. Results indicated that coverage reflected incidence rates more closely than they did mortality rates, but in both cases coverage under-represented the contribution of lung cancer to morbidity and mortality and over-represented the contribution of breast cancer. Of greater public health concern was the limited coverage of prevention and detection even for highly preventable or relatively easily detected cancers. Implications of findings are discussed.

No abstract

Prior research on knowledge gap effects, in health as well as in other domains, has focused largely on assessing individual-level differences in exposure to news based on self-report of media use. Inherent inferential limitations of this approach are addressed by testing the hypothesis that the relationship between education and cancer prevention knowledge will be moderated by regional differences in U.S. news coverage of cancer prevention. The study also tests, using these methods, findings by Kwak (1999) suggesting that the importance of attention to relevant news in predicting knowledge decreases as information available in the news increases. Using a representative national sample of newspaper coverage to assess regional differences in cancer prevention coverage, a representative national probability sample to assess respondent education and cancer prevention knowledge, and multilevel analyses of the relationship between regional coverage differences and knowledge of persons in those regions, support is found for both of these propositions.News coverage of health issues has been shown to predict associated knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in a variety of health domains, including substance use (Stryker, 2003) and cancer (Yanovitzky & Blitz, 2000). In particular, recent research has suggested the presence of knowledge gap effects in health domains-that is, the strength of the relationship between socio-economic status (SES) and health knowledge increases as the availability of relevant information in the social environment increases (Viswanath & Finnegan, 1996). In particular, one analysis has indicated that greater education predicts greater knowledge of the causes of cancer, as does attention to health news (Viswanath et al., 2006); another provides evidence that higher SES individuals are more likely to respond to media reports of celebrity diagnoses of cancer by seeking information than are lower SES individuals (Niederdeppe, 2008 (Lau, Hartman, & Ware, 1986;Slater & Flora, 1991) are probably more knowledgeable, more likely to adopt more healthy behaviors, and to report using more health-related media than are people less interested in health. These associations could generate spurious relationships, assuming that higher SES individuals may be less worried about paying rent and feeding family members and more able to give higher priority to health than lower SES individuals. In this case, one would expect higher SES individuals to have greater health knowledge and also report greater use of health-relevant media, for reasons having more to do with SES status than likely effects of greater media use.In this study, we use a unique, nationally representative data set of news coverage to identify regional differences in the amount of news coverage regarding cancer prevention and to assess the knowledge gap effect-i.e., whether a relationship between news coverage and health knowledge is contingent on people's level of education (Viswanath & Finnegan, 1996). In so doing, we provide a conservative tes...