Past studies of simultaneous attention to pairs of visual stimuli have used the "dual-task" paradigm to show that identification of the direction of a change in luminance, whether incremental or decremental, is "capacity-limited," while simple detection of these changes is governed by "capacity-free" processes. On the basis of that finding, it has been suggested that the contrast between identification and detection reflects different processes in the sensory periphery, namely the responses of magno-and parvocellular receptors. The present study questions that assertion and investigates the contribution of central processing in resource limitation by applying the dual task to a situation in which one stimulus is auditory and one is visual. The results are much the same as before, with identification demonstrating the tradeoff in performance generally attributed to a limited capacity but detection showing no loss compared with single-task controls. This implies that limitations on resources operate at a centrallevel of processing rather than in the auditory and visual peripheries.In divided attention, performance limitations depend on a variety of features of both the stimulus and the response (see Duncan, 1980, andHirst, 1986, for review). Recently, Bonnel, Stein, and Bertucci (1992) showed that limitations may also depend on the nature of the psychophysical paradigm. They used the dual-task methodology to present concurrent visual stimuli in two paradigms, "detection" and "identification." Subjects responded separately to simultaneous side-by-side visual channels. In detection, signals were increments in luminance S(+) that could be added to each channel independently. In identification, signals were either increments S(+) or decrements S( -) that were added to each stimulus independently. Thus, in detection, subjects monitored for the presence of signals whereas in identification they identified the signs ofsignals. Results indicated no effect ofconcurrence when the task was to detect, but clear deficits when the task was to identify.Greater understanding of divided attention in the dual task is revealed by "attention-operating characteristics" (AOCs), which plot joint performance as a function of attentional instructions (e.g.,