This study of Eocene carbonate succession in the Dinaric Foreland Basin of northern Dalmatia, Croatia, integrates palaeontological and sedimentological data to document a range of carbonate ramps formed intermittently during the basin tectonic development. The end‐Cretaceous basal erosional unconformity records the coupling of Adria and Eurasia crustal plates, with an antiformal uplift along their suture zone. The overlying late Ypresian carbonate ramp, spanning biozones SBZ 11–12, developed on the forebulge flank of a shallow‐marine early synclinal basin. Basal grainstone/packstone facies, dominated by encrusting foraminifers with alveolinids and miliolids, pass upwards into packstones dominated by miliolids and rotaliids with bryozoan and echinoid fragments, indicating an increased bathymetry of the retreating forebulge flank. Deposition of grainstone facies preceded an end‐Ypresian (SBZ 12/13 transition) subaerial exposure due to post‐subductional isostatic uplift. The younger, middle to late Eocene carbonate ramps (SBZ 13–19) formed episodically as perched isolated features on blind‐thrust anticlines in a bathymetrically diversified wedge‐top basin, where phases of clastic and skeletal biogenic sedimentation alternated due to disharmonic thrusting and relative sea‐level changes. Clastic sedimentation reflects anticline crest erosion and a forced‐regressive progradation of gravelly foreshore and sandy shoreface facies over heterolithic offshore‐transition and muddy offshore facies on the anticline flank. Biogenic sedimentation represents inner‐ to middle‐ramp environments, with the latter terminating bluntly in muddy offshore environment. An outer‐ramp environment, known from classic ramp models, was lacking due to bathymetric threshold. Analysis of larger benthic foraminifers (LBF), as biostratigraphic age indicators and palaeobathymetric proxies, helped distinguish systems tracts and determine their time span. A comparison of local and global sea‐level changes allowed the interplay of tectonic and eustatic forcing to be deciphered for the study area.

No abstract

The stratigraphic succession in the Čikola Canyon (part of the North Dalmatian Foreland Basin) was studied in detail to describe both the sedimentological characteristics and fossil assemblages of the Lower Eocene deposits during the initial stage of the foreland basin formation. The North Dalmatian Basin now represents a part of the Outer Dinarides, and was developed in front of the evolving Dinaric structures by tectonic deformation and marine transgression of an emerged and denuded Mesozoic Adriatic Carbonate Platform (AdCP). During the initial phase, a distal ramp of a foreland basin was formed, characterised by carbonate sedimentation, lasting until the Middle Eocene. In a studied section more than 300 m thick, porcelaneous foraminifera, Alveolina, Orbitolites and complex miliolids (Idalina, Periloculina) prevail, associated with conical agglutinated forms, nummulitids and red algae. These samples belong to the SBZ 11-12 (Ypresian), according to occurrences of Alveolina decastroi, Alveolina cremae, Alveolina multicanalifera and Coskinolina liburnica. Two main lithological units have been described: 1) mudstones to wackestones with sporadic occurrences of ostracods and charophyceae, deposited in restricted lagoonal settings with several episodes of freshwater influences, and 2) foraminiferal packstones to grainstones with complex miliolids, alveolinids, corallinacean algae and nummulitids, deposited within inner and middle ramp settings. Palaeogene deposition of ramp carbonates in the Outer Dinarides area was mainly controlled by the continuous compressional tectonics, and the deposits today appear in more or less discontinuous outcrops. Palaeogene transgression occurred at different times over various parts of the former carbonate platform area, and subsequent carbonate sedimentation was characterised by deposition in similar environments during different time intervals over spatially restricted carbonate ramps controlled by synsedimentary tectonics.

No abstract

Mass-transport deposits (MTDs) represent resedimentation phenomena triggered by the combined effect of seismic shocks of regional scale, structural tilting, basin-floor gradient, relative sea-level fluctuations, and/or excess pore-water pressure and can be useful in the reconstruction of basin development dynamics. The present study from the Dinaric Foreland Basin in Croatia documents several limestone blocks (olistoliths), carbonate debris, and associated bipartite carbonate megabeds as MTDs of exotic origin encased in deep neritic hyperpycnites, referred to as host deposits. Detailed facies and micropaleontological analyses indicate that host deposits were sourced from a fluvio-deltaic system located in the proximity of the uplifting orogen, while the MTDs originated from gravitational collapses of late Ypresian and early Lutetian limestones that were uplifted on blind-thrust anticline ridges on the opposite side of the basin. Mass wasting-produced carbonate blocks, debris, and gravity flows were probably triggered concurrently during the middle to late Eocene, but the blocks could have travelled faster downslope due to the lubricating effect of the underlying water “cushion,” overpressured mud, and the pull of gravity. Debrisflows and co-genetic turbidity currents that contributed to the formation of bipartite megabeds were likely mobilized deeper and moved slower than the carbonate blocks and could have been partly deflected by the previously emplaced olistoliths, resulting in megabed thinning along the olistoliths' down-dip edges. Those collapses were most likely triggered by the combined effect of relative sea-level changes associated with tectonic activity and seismic shocks of regional scale. The study suggests that progressive uplift of the frontal blind-thrust anticline ridge resulted in episodic emergence and collapses of progressively older limestone units, and marked the onset of development of the wedge-top basin. Conceptual models of olistolith emplacement and onset of basin development are suggested and may be applicable to both ancient and recent settings. The insights obtained from the integration of detailed facies analysis and micropaleontology may be useful in similar areas where such a level of detail cannot be obtained by conventional field methods.