No abstract

No abstract

Background Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the combination of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and targeted lymph node biopsy (TLNB), can reduce the false negative rates of sentinel node biopsy alone dramatically in breast cancer patients, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However methods for TAD are still under investigation. Methods Magseed®, a non-radioactive magnetic marker was used to mark the biopsied positive TLN after NAC. The SLNB with the standard technetium-based method and the selective TLNB with Magseed® localization were performed in 40 patients. The TLNs were identified with the Sentimag® probe and excised in all patients. Specimen x-ray was performed to confirm the Magseed® within the prior to NAC biopsied and clipped lymph node. Results The TLN identification rate was 100% (40/40), the SLN identification rate was 82.5% (33/40), the concordance rate between the TLN and the SLN was 65% (26/40). Complications according Magseed® deployment or identification could not be observed. Conclusion Magseed® is a reliable and feasible marker for the identification of TLNs after NAC.

The importance of steroid receptors for the prognosis of mammary carcinoma has been evaluated by investigating the course of disease in 163 patients for a median follow up time of 66 months after mastectomy. Multivariate analysis including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), the presence of 8S and 4S ER together or 4S ER only, and the lymph node status revealed only the latter to have significant (p less than 0.001) predictive potency. Lymph node positive (N-pos) patients had a 3.3 (1.7-6.2) fold risk of death and 2.8 (1.7-4.7) fold risk of recurrence relative to node negative (N-neg) patients. When we compared overall survival (OAS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the various receptor-positive groups with the groups that displayed neither ER nor PgR, significant differences in prognosis were only seen in N-neg patients. PgR did not turn out to be a better prognostic factor than ER, nor was the 8S ER a sign of increased OAS and DFS compared to total ER. However, the number of patients in this group was too small to allow a definite statement.

No abstract