Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an increasingly recognized condition burdened by significant acute and long-term adverse events. The availability of novel techniques expanded the knowledge on TTS and allowed a more accurate risk-stratification, potentially guiding clinical management. The present review aims to summarize the recent advances in TTS prognostic evaluation with a specific focus on novel imaging and genetic markers. Parametric deformation analysis by speckle-tracking echocardiography, as well as tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 mapping techniques, currently appear the most clinically valuable applications. Notwithstanding, computed tomography and nuclear imaging studies provided limited but promising data. A genetic predisposition to TTS has been hypothesized, though available evidence is still not sufficient. Although a genetic predisposition appears likely, further studies are needed to fully characterize the genetic background of TTS, in order to identify genetic markers that could assist in predicting disease recurrences and help in familial screening.
QTc prolongation is reported in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the causes of the QTc interval increase remain unclear. The main contribution to QTc prolongation in HCM is attributed to the myocardial hypertrophy and related structural damage. In a 24-year-old male proband, affected by HCM and long QTc, we identified by Next Generation Sequencing a pathogenic variant in gene TNNI3 co-inherited with a damaging variant in KCNQ1 gene. This evidence suggests the possibility that QTc interval prolongation and its dispersion in HCM could be associated not only to the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy but also to the co-inheritance of pathogenic variants related to both long QT Syndrome (LQTS) and HCM. Although the simultaneous presence of pathogenic variants in genes related to different heart diseases is extremely rare, counseling and genetic testing appear crucial for the clinical diagnosis. Screening of LQTS genes should be considered in HCM patients to clarify the origin of long QTc, to provide more information about the clinical presentation and to evaluate the incidence of the co-existence of LQTS/HCM gene variants that could occur more frequently than so far reported.
Aims Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is an indicator of right ventricular (RV) function and an independent predictor of right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Administration of vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC) could reduce RV workload allowing a better assessment of its functional reserve. Methods and results Patients undergoing LVAD implantation at our Institution between May 2013 and August 2021 were enrolled. Only patients who had undergone RHC and vasodilator challenge with sodium nitroprusside were analyzed. We collected all available clinical, instrumental, and haemodynamic parameters, at baseline and after nitroprusside infusion and evaluated potential associations with post-LVAD RVF. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 19 (35%) developed RVF after LVAD implantation. Fractional area change (FAC) (OR: 0.647, CI: 0.481–0.871; P = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR: 0.856, CI: 0.761–0.964; P = 0.010), and post-sodium nitroprusside (NTP) PAPi (OR: 0.218, CI: 0.073–0.653; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of post-LVAD RVF. The model combining FAC, PASP, and post-NTP PAPi demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 90.7%. Addition of post-NTP PAPi significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support right-sided heart failure risk score [79.4 vs. 70.4%; area under the curve (AUC): 0.841 vs. 0.724, P = 0.022] and the CRITT score (79.6% vs. 74%; AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.767 P = 0.033). Conclusion Post-NTP PAPi has observed to be an independent predictor of RVF following LVAD implantation. Dynamic assessment of PAPi using a vasodilator challenge may represent a method of testing RV functional reserve in candidates for LVAD implantation. Larger and prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Objectives. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) consistently reported better clinical outcomes with radial as compared to femoral access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nevertheless, heterogeneous use of potent antiplatelet drugs, such as Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI), across different studies could have biased the results in favor of radial access. We performed an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of RCTs in order to appraise whether the use of GPI had an impact on pooled estimates of clinical outcomes according to vascular access. Methods. We computed pooled estimates by the random-effects model for the following outcomes: mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and target vessel revascularization), and major bleedings. Additionally, we performed meta-regression analysis to investigate the impact of GPI use on pooled estimates of clinical outcomes. Results. We analyzed 14 randomized controlled trials and 11090 patients who were treated by radial (5497) and femoral access (5593), respectively. Radial access was associated with better outcomes for mortality (risk difference 0.01 (0.00, 0.01), p = 0.03 ), MACE (risk difference 0.01 (0.00, 0.02), p = 0.003 ), and major bleedings (risk difference 0.01 (0.00, 0.02), p = 0.02 ). At meta-regression, we observed a significant correlation of mortality with both GPI use ( p = 0.011 ) and year of publication ( p = 0.0073 ), whereas no correlation was observed with major bleedings. Conclusions. In this meta-analysis, the use of radial access for primary PCI was associated with better clinical outcomes as compared to femoral access. However, the effect size on mortality was modulated by GPI rate, with greater benefit of radial access in studies with larger use of these drugs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.