Multiple sclerosis (OMIM 126200) is a common disease of the central nervous system in which the interplay between inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes typically results in intermittent neurological disturbance followed by progressive accumulation of disability.1 Epidemiological studies have shown that genetic factors are primarily responsible for the substantially increased frequency of the disease seen in the relatives of affected individuals;2,3 and systematic attempts to identify linkage in multiplex families have confirmed that variation within the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) exerts the greatest individual effect on risk.4 Modestly powered Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)5-10 have enabled more than 20 additional risk loci to be identified and have shown that multiple variants exerting modest individual effects play a key role in disease susceptibility.11 Most of the genetic architecture underlying susceptibility to the disease remains to be defined and is anticipated to require the analysis of sample sizes that are beyond the numbers currently available to individual research groups. In a collaborative GWAS involving 9772 cases of European descent collected by 23 research groups working in 15 different countries, we have replicated almost all of the previously suggested associations and identified at least a further 29 novel susceptibility loci. Within the MHC we have refined the identity of the DRB1 risk alleles and confirmed that variation in the HLA-A gene underlies the independent protective effect attributable to the Class I region. Immunologically relevant genes are significantly over-represented amongst those mapping close to the identified loci and particularly implicate T helper cell differentiation in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

The primary clinical outcome measure for evaluating multiple sclerosis in clinical trials has been Kurtzke's expanded disability status scale (EDSS). New therapies appear to favourably impact the course of multiple sclerosis and render continued use of placebo control groups more difficult. Consequently, future trials are likely to compare active treatment groups which will most probably require increased sample sizes in order to detect therapeutic efficacy. Because more responsive outcome measures will be needed for active arm comparison studies, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis appointed a Task Force that was charged with developing improved clinical outcome measures. This Task Force acquired contemporary clinical trial and historical multiple sclerosis data for meta-analyses of primary and secondary outcome assessments to provide a basis for recommending a new outcome measure. A composite measure encompassing the major clinical dimensions of arm, leg and cognitive function was identified and termed the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC). The MSFC consists of three objective quantitative tests of neurological function which are easy to administer. Change in this MSFC over the first year of observation predicted subsequent change in the EDSS, suggesting that the MSFC is more sensitive to change than the EDSS. This paper provides details concerning the development and testing of the MSFC.

Both CBT and RT appear to be clinically effective treatments for fatigue in MS patients, although the effects for CBT are greater than those for RT. Even 6 months after treatment, both treatment groups reported levels of fatigue equivalent to those of the healthy comparison group.

This article provides recommendations from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. The Task Force was appointed in 1994 and charged with recommendending improved approaches for clinical outcomes assessment in future controlled clinical trials. The recommendations herein follow extensive deliberation and data analysis during 2.5 years. General principles and desirable measurement attributes were used to assess alternative measurement techniques and clinical scales. On the basis of the analysis of existing multiple sclerosis (MS) data sets, a new measurement approach is proposed. The approach is based on quantitative functional composites that consist of simple quantitative measures from the major clinical dimensions of MS combined into a single score. Quantitative functional composites are likely to provide improved precision and sensitivity in future MS clinical trials. Studies necessary to further refine quantitative functional composites as useful MS clinical trial outcomes are delineated.

To identify multiple sclerosis (MS) susceptibility loci, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 1,618 cases and used shared data for 3,413 controls. We performed replication in an independent set of 2,256 cases and 2,310 controls, for a total of 3,874 cases and 5,723 controls. We identified risk-associated SNPs on chromosome 12q13-14 (rs703842, P = 5.4 x 10(-11); rs10876994, P = 2.7 x 10(-10); rs12368653, P = 1.0 x 10(-7)) and upstream of CD40 on chromosome 20q13 (rs6074022, P = 1.3 x 10(-7); rs1569723, P = 2.9 x 10(-7)). Both loci are also associated with other autoimmune diseases. We also replicated several known MS associations (HLA-DR15, P = 7.0 x 10(-184); CD58, P = 9.6 x 10(-8); EVI5-RPL5, P = 2.5 x 10(-6); IL2RA, P = 7.4 x 10(-6); CLEC16A, P = 1.1 x 10(-4); IL7R, P = 1.3 x 10(-3); TYK2, P = 3.5 x 10(-3)) and observed a statistical interaction between SNPs in EVI5-RPL5 and HLA-DR15 (P = 0.001).

ObjectivesWe have undertaken a clinic-based survey of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) in Australia and New Zealand in order to establish incidence and prevalence across the region and in populations of differing ancestry.Background NMOSD is a recently defined demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The incidence and prevalence of NMOSD in Australia and New Zealand has not been established. European ancestry. We found NMOSD to be more common in the population with Asian ancestry. Methods

This article represents initial deliberation of an international task force appointed by the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society to develop recommendations for optimal clinical assessment tools for multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Presented within this article are the key issues identified by the task force during its initial year of deliberation. These include the precise purpose for a clinical assessment tool, the clinical dimensions to be measured in a multidimensional outcome measure, desirable attributes of an optimal clinical outcome measure, the complexities of multidimensional outcome measures, the relative merits of categorical clinical ratings and quantitative functional assessments, and a number of other important design issues that relate to the use of a multidimensional outcome measure. An action plan for analysis of existing data is summarized, as are the plans for more detailed recommendations from the task force.

Rizatriptan is a novel 5-HT1B/1D agonist which is rapidly absorbed after oral administration. The efficacy and tolerability of oral rizatriptan (5 mg and 10 mg) were examined in this multicenter, double-blind, outpatient study of 1473 migraineurs which featured randomized, placebo-controlled treatment of migraine recurrences. On experiencing moderate or severe migraine headaches, patients rated headache severity prior to dosing and at 30-minute intervals for 2 hours after dosing. Onset of effect was seen as early as 30 minutes after dosing with rizatriptan 10 mg. At 2 hours postdose, the percentage of patients with pain relief was significantly higher after rizatriptan 5 mg (62%) or 10 mg (71%) compared with placebo (35%). Complete relief was also significantly higher after rizatriptan 5 mg (33%) and 10 mg (42%) compared with placebo (10%). In patients experiencing headache recurrence after initial benefit, further relief was obtained in 71% with rizatriptan 5 mg (placebo 54%) and in 82% with rizatriptan 10 mg (placebo 44%). Complete relief of recurrent headache was obtained in 36% with rizatriptan 5 mg, 49% with rizatriptan 10 mg, and 15% with placebo (P < 0.05). The most common drug-related adverse experiences were dizziness, somnolence, asthenia/fatigue, and nausea (the incidences of which were low and dose related). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse experiences after use of up to three doses of rizatriptan within 24 hours. We conclude that both doses of rizatriptan are effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine and migraine recurrence, with the 10-mg dose preferred as it is more effective with a faster onset of action.