No abstract

Neural cells are able to finely tune gene expression through post-transcriptional mechanisms. Localization of mRNAs to subcellular regions has been detected in neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes providing these domains with a locally renewable source of proteins. Protein synthesis in dendrites has most frequently been associated with synaptic plasticity, while axonally synthesized proteins appear to facilitate pathfinding and injury responses. For oligodendrocytes, mRNAs encoding several proteins for myelin formation are locally generated suggesting that this mechanism assists in myelination. Astrocytic processes have not been well studied but localization of GFAP mRNA has been demonstrated. Both RNA transport and localized translation are regulated processes. RNA transport appears to be highly selective and, at least in part, the destiny of individual mRNAs is determined in the nucleus. RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions determine which mRNAs are targeted to subcellular regions. Several RNA binding proteins that drive mRNA localization have also been shown to repress translation during transport. Activity of the translational machinery is also regulated in distal neural cell processes. Clinically, disruption of mRNA localization and/or localized mRNA translation may contribute to pathophysiology of fragile X mental retardation and spinal muscular atrophy. Axonal injury has been shown to activate localized protein synthesis, providing both a means to initiate regeneration and retrogradely signal injury to the cell body. Decreased capacity to transport mRNAs and translational machinery into distal processes could jeopardize the ability to respond to injury or local stimuli within axons and dendrites.

Previous studies have shown that injured dorsal column sensory axons extend across a spinal cord lesion site if axons are guided by a gradient of neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) rostral to the lesion. Here we examined whether continuous NT-3 delivery is necessary to sustain regenerated axons in the injured spinal cord. Using tetracycline-regulated (tet-off) lentiviral gene delivery, NT-3 expression was tightly controlled by doxycycline administration. To examine axon growth responses to regulated NT-3 expression, adult rats underwent a C3 dorsal funiculus lesion. The lesion site was filled with bone marrow stromal cells, tet-off-NT-3 virus was injected rostral to the lesion site and the intrinsic growth capacity of sensory neurons was activated by a conditioning lesion. When NT-3 gene expression was turned on, CTB-labeled sensory axons regenerated into and beyond the lesion/graft site. Surprisingly, the number of regenerated axons significantly declined when NT-3 expression was turned off, whereas continued NT-3 expression sustained regenerated axons. Quantification of axon numbers beyond the lesion demonstrated a significant decline of axon growth in animals with transient NT-3 expression, only some axons that had regenerated over longer distance were sustained. Regenerated axons were located in white matter and did not form axodendritic synapses but expressed presynaptic markers when closely associated with NG2-labeled cells. A decline in axon density was also observed within cellular grafts after NT-3 expression was turned off possibly via reduction in L1 and laminin expression in Schwann cells. Thus, multiple mechanisms underlie the inability of transient NT-3 expression to fully sustain regenerated sensory axons.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to irreversible functional impairment caused by neuronal loss and the disruption of neuronal connections across the injury site. While several experimental strategies have been used to minimize tissue damage and to enhance axonal growth and regeneration, the corticospinal projection, which is the most important voluntary motor system in humans, remains largely refractory to regenerative therapeutic interventions. To date, one of the most promising pre-clinical therapeutic strategies has been neural stem cell (NSC) therapy for SCI. Over the last decade we have found that host axons regenerate into spinal NSC grafts placed into sites of SCI. These regenerating axons form synapses with the graft, and the graft in turn extends very large numbers of new axons from the injury site over long distances into the distal spinal cord. Here we discuss the pathophysiology of SCI that makes the spinal cord refractory to spontaneous regeneration, the most recent findings of neural stem cell therapy for SCI, how it has impacted motor systems including the corticospinal tract and the implications for sensory feedback.

Both cyclic AMP (cAMP) and nerve growth factor (NGF) have been shown to cause rapid activation of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) by phosphorylation of serine 133, but additional regulatory events contribute to CREB-targeted gene expression. Here, we have used stable transfection with a simple cAMP response element (CRE)-driven reporter to address the kinetics of CRE-dependent transcription during neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. In naive cells, dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP) generated a rapid increase in CRE-driven luciferase activity by 5 h that returned to naive levels by 24 h. Luciferase induction after NGF treatment was delayed until 48 h when CRE-driven luciferase expression became TrkA dependent. Blocking histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity accelerated NGF-dependent CRE-driven luciferase expression by at least 24 h and resulted in a sustained cAMP-dependent expression of CRE-driven luciferase beyond 24 h. Inhibition of protein synthesis before stimulation with NGF or dbcAMP indicated that both stimuli induce expression of a transcriptional repressor that delays NGFdependent and attenuates cAMP-dependent CRE-driven transcription. NGF caused a rapid but transient HDACdependent increase in inducible cAMP element repressor (ICER) expression, but ICER expression was sustained with increased cAMP. Depletion of ICER from PC12 cells indicated that HDAC-dependent ICER induction is responsible for the delay in CRE-dependent transcription after NGF treatment.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) research continues to make substantial progress in identifying both neuron-intrinsic and neuron-extrinsic mechanisms that limit central nervous system (CNS) plasticity and regeneration. The identification of these mechanisms has in turn led to several novel strategies for therapeutically enhancing recovery of the injured CNS. Despite this progress, clinical translation remains a challenge for several reasons, including: 1) problems in projecting beneficial outcomes from small animal models to primate systems, 2) a lack of robust improvement in functional outcomes in animal models, and 3) difficulty replicating published reports in the field. Collectively, while the field has seen great progress, reconstructing the exquisite circuitry of the injured human CNS will require yet greater progress in both understanding of basic mechanisms underlying axonal growth and guidance, and testing of optimized therapies in models more predictive of potential human benefit.