Patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor outcome with survival of less than 1 year regardless of advancements in treatment strategy. In the past, some randomized clinical trials have been conducted with heterogeneous inclusion criteria, diagnostic parameters, response evaluation and primary endpoints. Efforts to develop a standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment and liquid biopsy techniques to monitor disease evolution in plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are underway. This review aims to cover the main clinical and diagnostic challenges of LM from NSCLC, in particular the role of MRI, CSF cytology and liquid biopsy for the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease, as well as the most recent clinical trials on targeted therapies. Targeted therapy, such as epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged inhibitors, represent a feasible treatment with encouraging results in terms of disease control and survival. For ineligible patients, immune checkpoint inhibitors could represent a therapeutic option with acceptable tolerance, although clinical trials focused on LM from NSCLC are lacking and represent a research focus for the future.
Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis is a neurological complication from HER2-positive breast cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study has evaluated the activity of neratinib in association with capecitabine in 10 patients with LM from HER2-positive BC after the failure of multiple lines of treatment, including trastuzumab-based therapy, within a compassionate program, and a comparison was made with a historical control group of 10 patients. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with histological diagnosis of primary HER2-positive BC, either amplified or mutated, and newly-diagnosed LM were enrolled. Coexistence of BM that has or has not received radiotherapy, as well as prior chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or monoclonal HER2-targeting antibodies or antibody–drug conjugates, were allowed, with the exclusion of lapatinib. Results: Six-months OS was 60% with a median OS of 10 months (95% CI: 2.00–17.0). Three-month intracranial PFS was 60% with a median intracranial PFS of 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.00–6.0). The neurological benefit was observed in 70% of patients with a median duration of neurological response of 6.5 months. The best radiological response was stable disease in 60% of patients. Conclusions: This small series shows that the combination of neratinib and capecitabine is a safe treatment in LM from heavily pretreated HER2-positive BC with clinical efficacy in some patients and is worth investigating in a larger study.
BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) occur in 5% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) breast cancer (BC) with a poor overall survival (OS) of 3 months. Neratinib is an oral, irreversible tyrosine kinase pan-inhibitor that was approved by FDA for the treatment of HER2-enriched BC, who completed a prior adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of neratinib in LM from HER2-positive BC after the failure of multiple lines of treatment, including trastuzumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 18 years; histological diagnosis of primary HER2-positive BC; newly-diagnosed LM according to LANO criteria; KPS ≥60 at the time of diagnosis of LM; coexistence of BM that have or not received WBRT or radiosurgery; systemic disease with a life expectancy of at least 3 months; concomitant drugs, including capecitabine, trastuzumab, TDM-1, pertuzumab, and hormone therapy were allowed, with the exclusion of lapatinib or other investigational agents. Neratinib was administered 240 mg daily continuously. The primary endpoint was the OS after the diagnosis of LM. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) following the diagnosis of LM, neurological benefit, radiological response rate, and tolerability. RESULTS From January 2018 to April 2021, 9 patients with LM have been enrolled. Median age at the time of diagnosis of LM was 44 years (95%CI 36–59) with a median KPS of 80 (95%CI 60–90). Median time since LM onset from the diagnosis of primary BC was 42 months (95%CI 11–166), and patients underwent a median number of adjuvant treatments before LM of 3 (95%CI 2–5). Three patients developed LM alone, and other 6 had LM associated with multiple brain metastases. Six-months and 1-year OS were 66.7% and 22.3%, respectively, with a median OS of 8 months (95%CI 3–13*). Median PFS was 3.5 months (95%CI 2–6) after the start of treatment. A neurological improvement was reported in 2/9 patients (22.2%), while in other 4/9 patients (44.5%) was achieved a neurological stabilization lasting for a median time of 5 months (95%CI 2–19). The best radiological response was a stable disease in 5/9 patients (55.6%), while no complete or partial response were achieved according to LANO and RANO criteria, respectively. A CSF clearance was observed in 1 patient only (11.1%) following two months of neratinib. Grade III-IV adverse events were not reported, and 2 patients only (22.2%) had mild diarrhea correlated with neratinib. CONCLUSION This is the first study that shows that neratinib might be a safe and effective treatment in LM from heavily pretreated HER2-positive BC.
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of neratinib in LM from HER2-positive BC after the failure of multiple lines of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 18 years; histological diagnosis of primary HER2-positive BC; newly-diagnosed LM (LANO criteria); KPS ≥ 60; coexistence of BM that have or not received radiotherapy; life expectancy ≥ 3 months; previous drugs, including capecitabine, trastuzumab, T-DM1, pertuzumab, and hormone therapy, were allowed, with the exclusion of lapatinib or other investigational agents. Neratinib was administered 240 mg daily continuously. Primary endpoint was the OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), neurological benefit, radiological response rate, and tolerability. RESULTS Nine patients with LM have been enrolled with a median age of 44 years, and a median KPS of 80. Median time since LM onset from the diagnosis of primary BC was 42 months, and patients underwent a median number of adjuvant treatments before LM of 3. Three patients developed LM alone, and other 6 had LM associated with multiple BM. Six-months and 1-year OS were 66.7% and 22.3%, respectively, with a median OS of 8 months (95%CI 3-13*). Median PFS was 3.5 months (95%CI 2-6) after the start of treatment. A neurological improvement was reported in 2/9 patients (22.2%), while in other 4/9 patients (44.5%) was achieved a neurological stabilization lasting for a median time of 5 months (95%CI 2-19). The best radiological response was a stable disease in 5/9 patients (55.6%), while no complete or partial were achieved according to LANO criteria. A CSF clearance was observed in 1 patient only (11.1%). Grade III-IV adverse events were not reported, and 2 patients only (22.2%) had mild diarrhea correlated with neratinib. CONCLUSIONS Neratinib might be a safe and effective treatment in LM from heavily pretreated HER2-positive BC.
BACKGROUND Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis following an extensive resection, radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Once GBM progresses after SOC, lomustine is the standard second-line treatment, while rechallenge with TMZ may be employed in selected patients with methylated promoter of MGMT, and bevacizumab is reserved for patients with extensive edema and need for steroids. New treatment modalities have been investigated at first recurrence, including alternating electric fields (TTFields) or antibody direct against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuximab mafodontin (ABT-414, Depatux-M), that have shown some activity in terms of disease control and progression-free survival (PFS). CLINICAL PRESENTATION In September 2018, a 38 year-old man developed reduced strength in left upper limb and daily focal seizures. MRI showed an enhancing right fronto-temporal lesion which was subtotally removed with a diagnosis of glioblastoma (IDH 1/2 wild type, MGMT methylated - 40%, EGFR amplified, EGFRvIII positive). As the patient had a poor KPS (50), in October 2018 a hypofractionated RT (DFT 40 Gy/15 fractions) with concomitant TMZ (140 mg/day) was performed, followed by adjuvant standard TMZ (340 mg/day); however, chemotherapy was stopped after 3 cycles due to local progression on MRI coupled with strength worsening, increased seizure frequency, and need for steroids. Pseudoprogression was ruled out due to tumor growth out of the field of RT. Based on the high level of methylation of the MGMT promoter and EGFR amplification, a combined treatment with metronomic TMZ (100 mg/day continuously) plus Depatux-M (1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was started (February 2019), but a brain MRI performed after 3 months of treatment displayed no significant changes on both MRI and neurological status. At this time point (May 2019) TTFields treatment was added. An initial decrease of tumor size was observed on MRI after 5 months, while a reduction of tumor size more than 90% has been progressively achieved after 1 year of treatment (April 2020). Moreover, a seizure-free status was observed without changing the antiepileptic medication. The patient developed a grade 3 ocular side effect (CTCAE version 5.0) with photophobia, blurred vision, foreign body sensation in the eyes after 6 months of treatment, which improved after dose delays and dose reduction of Depatux-M. The patient is still alive, and free of progression after 30 months and 25 months from diagnosis and first recurrence, respectively. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first report of a recurrent GBM with a significant and long-lasting neuroradiological response following a combined treatment with TTFields, Depatux-M, and intensified schedule of TMZ. A synergistic effect of TTFields with compounds interfering with the microtubular system should be further investigated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.