Background Due to the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) disease outbreak, social distancing measures were imposed to control the spread of the pandemic. However, isolation may affect negatively the psychological well-being and impair sleep quality. Our aim was to evaluate the sleep quality of respiratory patients during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Methods All patients who underwent a telemedicine appointment from March 30 to April 30 of 2020 were asked to participate in the survey. Sleep difficulties were measured using Jenkins Sleep Scale. Results The study population consisted of 365 patients (mean age 63.9 years, 55.6% male, 50.1% with sleep-disordered breathing [SDB]). During the lockdown, 78.9% of participants were confined at home without working. Most patients (69.6%) reported at least one sleep difficulty and frequent awakenings was the most prevalent problem. Reporting at least one sleep difficulty was associated with home confinement without working, female gender and diagnosed or suspected SDB, after adjustment for cohabitation status and use of anxiolytics. Home confinement without working was associated with difficulties falling asleep and waking up too early in the morning. Older age was a protective factor for difficulties falling asleep, waking up too early and non-restorative sleep. Notably, SDB patients with good compliance to positive airway pressure therapy were less likely to report sleep difficulties. Conclusions Home confinement without working, female gender and SDB may predict a higher risk of reporting sleep difficulties. Medical support during major disasters should be strengthened and potentially delivered through telemedicine, as this comprehensive approach could reduce psychological distress and improve sleep quality.

This prospective experimental study aimed to compare effects of 3 different home-based postoperative respiratory muscle training protocols – inspiratory, expiratory and combined, in the patients’ postoperative recovery, regarding safety and respiratory muscle function, pulmonary function, physical fitness, physical activity (PA), dyspnoea and quality of life (QoL). Patients were divided in four groups Usual Care (UCare), inspiratory (IMT), expiratory (EMT) or combined muscle training (CombT) according to group allocation. Significant treatment*time interactions were found for maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (p=0.014), sedentary PA (SEDPA) (p=0.003), light PA (LIGPA) (p=0.045) and total PA (p=0.035). Improvements were observed for MIP in CombT (p=0.001), IMT (p=0.001), EMT (p=0.050). SEDPA reduced in EMT (p=0.001) and IMT (p=0.006), while LIGPA increased in both groups (p=0.001), as well as Total PA (p=0.005 and p=0.001, respectively). In UCare, CombT, and EMT, QoL improved only for Usual Activities. In conclusion, the addition of respiratory muscle training to physiotherapy usual care is safe and effective to increase MIP and contribute to improve physical activity. The CombT showed greater improvement on MIP, while IMT compared to EMT, was more effective to improve physical activity.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment adherence is widely recognized as a critical problem in long-term oxygen therapy, particularly in ambulatory liquid oxygen (LOX) systems. Adherence-monitoring strategies may be helpful in managing patients. We evaluated subjects' adherence to LOX using VisionOx and compared these results with the subjects' own adherence diaries and self-reported perceptions of use. METHODS: Patients using LOX were recruited for a clinical interview; the number of days/week and the mean time of use according to subjects' perceptions were recorded. A 14-day diary was provided for every subject while VisionOx was attached to the LOX. VisionOx is a small device that uses pressure transducers to detect oxygen flow and the subject's breathing frequency. Information is stored and downloaded using dedicated software. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects were included (57.9% male with a median age of 63 years). When asked about the perception of LOX use, subjects self-reported using the device for a median of 100.0% of days (78.9% reported to have used it every day) for a median time of 180 min/day. According to data from VisionOx and subjects' diaries during the 14-day evaluation period, the median use was 92.8% of days for 210 min/day. No difference was found between the diaries and VisionOx data. Regarding subjects' perceptions of use, the declared use of LOX percent was significantly higher than reported in the diaries (P ‫؍‬ .045) and VisionOx monitoring (P ‫؍‬ .045) even though both underestimated the median use per day. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects overestimated adherence to LOX therapy (when measuring percent of days of use) compared to adherence diary and objective adherence monitoring. Because no significant difference was found comparing the diaries and VisionOx use, either may be helpful in clinical practice.

No abstract