No abstract

Invasive species can change selective pressures on native plants by altering biotic and abiotic conditions in invaded habitats. Although invasions can lead to native species extirpation, they may also induce rapid evolutionary changes in remnant native plants. We investigated whether adult plants of five native perennial grasses exhibited trait shifts consistent with evolution in response to invasion by the introduced annual grass Bromus tectorum L. (cheatgrass), and asked how much variation there was among species and populations in the ability to grow successfully with the invader. Three hundred and twenty adult plants were collected from invaded and uninvaded communities from four locations near Reno, Nevada, USA. Each plant was divided in two and transplanted into the greenhouse. One clone was grown with B. tectorum while the other was grown alone, and we measured tolerance (ability to maintain size) and the ability to reduce size of B. tectorum for each plant. Plants from invaded populations consistently had earlier phenology than those from uninvaded populations, and in two out of four sites, invaded populations were more tolerant of B. tectorum competition than uninvaded populations. Poa secunda and one population of E. multisetus had the strongest suppressive effect on B. tectorum, and these two species were the only ones that flowered in competition with B. tectorum. Our study indicates that response to B. tectorum is a function of both location and species identity, with some, but not all, populations of native grasses showing trait shifts consistent with evolution in response to B. tectorum invasion within the Great Basin.

The life-long addition of new neurons has been documented in many regions of the vertebrate and invertebrate brain, including the hippocampus of mammals (Altman and Das, 1965; Eriksson et al., 1998; Jacobs et al., 2000), song control nuclei of birds (Alvarez-Buylla et al., 1990), and olfactory pathway of rodents (Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1994), insects (Cayre et al., 1996) and crustaceans (Harzsch and Dawirs, 1996; Sandeman et al., 1998; Harzsch et al., 1999; Schmidt, 2001). The possibility of persistent neurogenesis in the neocortex of primates is also being widely discussed (Gould et al., 1999; Kornack and Rakic, 2001). In these systems, an effort is underway to understand the regulatory mechanisms that control the timing and rate of neurogenesis. Hormonal cycles (Rasika et al., 1994; Harrison et al., 2001), serotonin (Gould, 1999; Brezun and Daszuta, 2000; Beltz et al., 2001), physical activity (Van Praag et al., 1999) and living conditions (Kemperman and Gage, 1999; Sandeman and Sandeman, 2000) influence the rate of neuronal proliferation and survival in a variety of organisms, suggesting that mechanisms controlling life-long neurogenesis are conserved across a range of vertebrate and invertebrate species. The present article extends these findings by demonstrating circadian control of neurogenesis. Data show a diurnal rhythm of neurogenesis among the olfactory projection neurons in the crustacean brain, with peak proliferation during the hours surrounding dusk, the most active period for lobsters. These data raise the possibility that light-controlled rhythms are a primary regulator of neuronal proliferation, and that previously-demonstrated hormonal and activity-driven influences over neurogenesis may be secondary events in a complex circadian control pathway.