Influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus continues to rapidly spread worldwide. In 2009, pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection in a domestic cat from Iowa was diagnosed by a novel PCR assay that distinguishes between Eurasian and North American pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus matrix genes. Human-to-cat transmission is presumed.

Classical swine dysentery is associated with the presence of the strongly beta-hemolytic Brachyspira hyodysenteriae. However, multiple Brachyspira spp. can colonize the porcine colon. Since 2008, several Brachyspira spp. not identified as B. hyodysenteriae by genotypic and/or phenotypic methods have been isolated from the feces of pigs with clinical disease typical of swine dysentery. In the current study, 8 clinical isolates, including 5 strongly beta-hemolytic and 3 weakly beta-hemolytic Brachyspira strains, and a reference strain of B. hyodysenteriae (B204) were inoculated into pigs (n = 6 per isolate) to compare pathogenic potential following oral inoculation. Results revealed that strongly beta-hemolytic isolates induced significantly greater typhlocolitis than those that are weakly beta-hemolytic, regardless of the genetic identification of the isolate, and that strongly beta-hemolytic isolates identified as "Brachyspira sp. SASK30446" and Brachyspira intermedia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) produced lesions similar to those caused by B. hyodysenteriae. The results suggest that phenotypic culture characteristics of Brachyspira spp. may be a more sensitive indicator of potential to induce dysentery-like disease in pigs than molecular identification alone based on currently available PCR assays. Additionally, culture of mucosal scrapings obtained at necropsy was more sensitive than direct PCR on the same samples for detection of Brachyspira spp.

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is an important cause of pneumonia in pigs around the world, but confirming its presence in (or absence from) pigs can be difficult. Culture for diagnosis is impractical, and seroconversion is often delayed after natural infection, limiting the use of serology. Numerous PCR assays for the detection of M. hyopneumoniae have been developed, targeting several different genes. Recently, genetic diversity among strains of M. hyopneumoniae was demonstrated. The effect of this diversity on the accuracy and sensitivity of the M. hyopneumoniae PCR assays could result in false-negative results in current PCR tests. In this study, a panel of isolates of M. hyopneumoniae, M. flocculare, M. hyorhinis, and M. hyosynoviae were tested with a number of M. hyopneumoniae-specific PCR assays. Some M. hyopneumoniae PCR assays tested did not detect all isolates of M. hyopneumoniae. To increase the efficiency of PCR testing, two new real-time PCR assays that are specific and capable of detecting all of the M. hyopneumoniae isolates used in this study were developed.Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the causative agent of enzootic pneumonia and an integral component of the porcine respiratory disease complex. Considered one of the most important sources of disease-associated losses in swine production, M. hyopneumoniae is also one of the most difficult to detect. This organism is difficult to isolate in pure culture because it is easily overgrown by other contaminating bacteria; therefore, culture is generally not attempted. In addition, seroconversion to M. hyopneumoniae is often slow within a herd and can vary considerably among pigs, making the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays less effective. A number of PCR assays have been developed and reported to be both sensitive and specific for M. hyopneumoniae (4,6,11,19,20,22,24,26). As a result, this technique is now among the most widely used for detection of M. hyopneumoniae in pigs.While the development of PCR assays has greatly enhanced our ability to detect M. hyopneumoniae, the genetic variability of the organism (1,5,12,14,15,21) can affect detection by PCR. It is not known what effect this heterogeneity has on the sensitivities of the different assays. Real-time PCR has many advantages over traditional PCR assays, including less time to obtain quantitative results and a decrease in environmental contamination. Together, these traits make real-time PCR assays preferred in diagnostic and research settings. A real-time assay that is based on a conserved target common among isolates of M. hyopneumoniae has not yet been described. The two currently published M. hyopneumoniae-specific real-time assays had to be used in combination in order to detect all M.hyopneumoniae field samples in a Swiss collection of isolates (6). In addition, many of the previously published PCR assays were validated using only a small number of mycoplasma isolates. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to measure the ability of several M. hyopneumoniae-specific PCR assays to de...

Abstract. Mycoplasma bovis is an important bacterial pathogen in cattle, producing a variety of clinical diseases. The organism, which requires specialized culture conditions and extended incubation times to isolate and identify, is frequently associated with concurrent infection with other pathogens which can potentially be more easily identified. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) is a valuable diagnostic technique that can rapidly identify infectious agents in clinical specimens. A real-time PCR assay was designed based on the uvrC gene to identify M. bovis in diagnostic samples. Using culture as the gold standard test, the assay performed well in a variety of diagnostic matrices. 100%]). Low numbers of other sample matrices showed good agreement between results of culture and PCR. A review of clinical cases from 2009 revealed that, in general, PCR was used much more frequently than culture and provided useful diagnostic information in conjunction with clinical signs, signalment, and gross and histopathologic lesions. Diagnostic performance of the real-time PCR assay developed as a testing method indicates that it is a rapid, accurate assay that is adaptable to a variety of PCR platforms and can provide reliable results on an array of clinical samples.

The objective of this study was to investigate the immune responses elicited by either a modified-live (MLV) or a killed virus (KV) porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine. Specifically, we investigated the effects of multiple vaccinations on antigen-specific cellular and antibody responses against PRRSV. Twelve sows were obtained from herds with either a history of repeated MLV or KV PRRSV vaccination and a non-vaccinated, PRRSV-negative herd. Within herd, sows were divided into three groups and vaccinated with MLV, KV, or injected with saline. On day 0, 27, and 38, recall responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to the parent strains of the vaccines (e.g., MLV-VR2332 or KV-ISUP) were examined. The concentrations of total PRRSV-specific and virus-neutralizing serum antibodies were determined by ELISA and serum neutralization assays. Following immunization, the antigen-specific proliferation of CD8alphabeta(+), CD4(+)CD8alphaalpha(+) T cells in the naive sows was greater than in sows repeatedly vaccinated with KV or MLV. This diminished lymphoproliferative responses of CD8alphabeta(+) and CD4(+)CD8alphaalpha(+) T cells could be partially overcome by heterologous immunization. However, B cell proliferation, PRRSV antibody concentrations and virus neutralizing antibody titers were not enhanced by heterologous immunization and only KV vaccination increased antibody levels in previously immunized (MLV or KV) sows.

Abstract. Typhlocolitis and dysentery due to Brachyspira hyodysenteriae infection represent an economically important disease syndrome in growing pigs. Largely disappearing from U.S. swine herds in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Brachyspiraassociated disease and bacterial isolation from swine with clinical disease has increased in the last several years, and non-B. hyodysenteriae isolates are commonly identified. Antimicrobial resistance has been demonstrated in Brachyspira spp. isolates from Europe and Asia, and may be the reason for the resurgence in U.S. herds. Seventy-nine clinical isolates identified at the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Lab were tested with multiple polymerase chain reaction assays to establish species identity, and evaluated for minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) using an agar dilution method against lincomycin, gentamicin, valnemulin, tiamulin, salinomycin, and carbadox. Only 38.0% of isolates could be confirmed as the known pathogens B. hyodysenteriae (30.4%) or Brachyspira pilosicoli (7.6%). Twenty of the 79 isolates (25.3%) were identified as Brachyspira murdochii, and 13.9% could not be identified to species. The MIC values were consistently high against lincomycin and moderately high against gentamicin. The remaining antimicrobials had MICs that were at the low end of the test ranges. Brachyspira murdochii and Brachyspira spp. had significantly greater MIC values against several of these drugs than other Brachyspira spp. examined. The increased incidence of these less definitively characterized Brachyspira species with increased MIC values to commonly prescribed antimicrobials may, at least in part, explain the increased prevalence and severity of this disease complex in recent years. Further research is necessary to understand these changes.

No abstract

Abstract. The objective of the current study was to evaluate various RNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols for the detection of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in porcine oral fluids. Extraction protocols were selected based on ease of use and compatibility with high-throughput, automated systems. The results showed marked differences among extraction protocols, PCR protocols, and combinations thereof in detecting PRRSV in the oral fluid matrix. An important finding was that PCR reactions were partially inhibited by unknown factors in the oral fluid matrix and that inhibition was reduced by use of a higher concentration of PCR enzymes. The results suggest that further optimization of PCR assays for porcine oral fluids is needed and that laboratories should not assume that methods optimized for detection of virus in serum will perform equally with porcine oral fluids.