Background Urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) in the bladder can be difficult to diagnose due to factors including procedural artifact, minimal tissue sampled, therapy-related changes, and various CIS growth patterns. Prior data has demonstrated an increase in alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR) in urothelial CIS, but there is no information on its utility for diagnosing difficult cases. The aim of this investigation was to assess the expression of AMACR that was ordered on equivocal bladder cases during clinical practice. Methods Transurethral resections of the bladder in which AMACR and CK20 were performed during diagnostic workup were identified and cases with a final diagnosis of CIS ( n = 22) or non-neoplastic urothelium ( n = 30) were selected. Additionally, cases in which a diagnosis of CIS was rendered without IHC ( n = 20) were selected and tested for AMACR expression. Results Sensitivity of AMACR for CIS diagnosed with IHC during clinical practice was 73% and specificity was 97%, while CK20 was 95% sensitive and 80% specific. Sensitivity of AMACR in CIS diagnosed without IHC was 100%. In all groups, AMACR had inconsistent intensity, compared to CK20 which had consistent, strong intensity. Conclusions AMACR was usually positive in urothelial CIS and negative in non-neoplastic urothelium. However, it is important to note that AMACR was less sensitive in difficult cases, while CK20 was more sensitive with more consistent, strong staining compared to AMACR.

No abstract

Superficial angiomyxoma is an uncommon benign mesenchymal neoplasm that usually arises in dermis/subcutis of the extremities or trunk. Some tumors are associated with Carney complex. When arising in breast, these tumors are not wellrecognized, mainly due to a lack of uniform nomenclature in the literature. This study therefore aims to improve recognition of angiomyxomas of the breast region. Forty cases were identified: demographics, presence of Carney complex, imaging and histologic features, PRKAR1A expression, and outcomes were evaluated. There were 22 female and 18 male patients (median age 40 years, range: 14 to 72). Most tumors presented as slowlygrowing masses (77%). All but one were solitary, and median size was 1.5 cm. Tumors were superficial (dermal/subcutaneous) in 52.5% and deep/parenchymal in 47.5%. Nine involved the nippleareola complex. All showed characteristic features of superficial angiomyxoma: poorly circumscribed, hypocellular, myxoid neoplasms with lobulated (55%) or infiltrative (45%) architecture, bland spindled fibroblasts, prominent thin-walled vessels, and admixed neutrophils. Tumors involving the nipple-areola complex infiltrated through areolar smooth muscle, and deep/parenchymal tumors showed entrapment of lobules mimicking myxoid fibroadenoma. Mitoses were typically absent, as was significant atypia. Cystic change was common. Two-thirds showed loss of PRKAR1A expression by immunohistochemistry. Two patients had Carney complex (7%). Recurrence after incomplete excision occurred in 1 patient. Angiomyxoma of breast may arise at superficial, nipple-areola or deep/parenchymal locations, where it can be difficult to recognize classic histologic features. Loss of expression of PRKAR1A is not invariable, but may be a helpful diagnostic clue. Recognizing angiomyxoma is important for 2 reasons: first, the recurrence rate is low and therefore wide excision is not essential, and second, it may allow detection of Carney complex in some patients.

No abstract