The purpose of this study was to examine how gonadal steroid hormones modulate basal nociception and morphine antinociception relative to regulating reproduction in the adult rat. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were either gonadectomized (GDX) or sham-gonadectomized (sham); GDX males were implanted subcutaneously with capsules containing testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), E2 and DHT, or nothing (0). GDX females received E2, T, or empty (0) capsules immediately after surgery, and vehicle or progesterone (P4) injections at 4-day intervals. Basal nociception and morphine antinociception were tested 28 days after surgery on 50°C and 54°C hotplate tests, and reproductive behavior and physiology were assessed shortly thereafter. There were no significant differences in baseline hotplate latencies among the male treatment groups, but morphine was significantly more potent in sham and GDX + T males than in GDX + 0 males. The ability of T to increase morphine's potency was approximated by its major metabolites E2 and DHT, given together but not alone. Baseline hotplate latencies were higher in sham females tested during diestrus than in those tested during estrus. Morphine was significantly more potent in sham females tested during proestrus and diestrus than in those tested during estrus. Baseline hotplate latencies were significantly higher, and morphine was significantly less potent in GDX + E2, GDX + E2/P4 and GDX + T females than in GDX + 0 females. All group differences in basal nociception and morphine antinociception observed on the 50°C hotplate test were smaller and generally nonsignificant on the 54°C hotplate test. Steroid manipulations produced the expected changes in reproductive behaviors and steroid-sensitive organs. These results demonstrate that in adult rats, gonadal steroid manipulations that are physiologically relevant, modulate (1) basal nociception in females but not males, and (2) morphine's antinociceptive potency in both males and females.
Previous studies suggest that sex differences in morphine antinociception in rodents might be attributed to the activational effects of gonadal hormones. The present study determined whether hormonal modulation of opioid antinociception in adult rats extends to opioids other than the prototypic mu agonist morphine. Male and female rats were sham-gonadectomized (sham-GDX) or gonadectomized (GDX) and replaced with no hormone, estradiol (E2, females), progesterone (P4, females), E2+P4 (females), or testosterone (males). Approximately 28 days later, nociception was evaluated on the 50°C hot plate and warm water tail withdrawal tests before and after subcutaneous administration of hydromorphone, buprenorphine, U50,488, or SNC 80. In sham-GDX (gonadally intact) rats, the mu agonists and U50,488 were less effective in females than in males in at least one nociceptive test, and the delta agonist SNC 80 was less effective in males than in females. In males, gonadectomy tended to decrease, and testosterone tended to increase antinociception produced by 3 of the 4 agonists. In females, gonadectomy and hormone treatment had more variable effects, although E2 tended to decrease mu opioid antinociception. The present results suggest that activational effects of gonadal hormones are relatively modest and somewhat inconsistent on antinociception produced by various opioid agonists in the adult rat.Perspective: This study demonstrates that reproductive hormones such as testosterone in males and estradiol in females do not consistently modulate sensitivity to the analgesic effects of opioids in the adult organism. KeywordsTestosterone; estradiol; progesterone; pain; analgesia; sex differences Accumulating evidence suggests that there are sex differences in the acute antinociceptive effects of opioids in rodents, with males generally displaying greater opioid sensitivity than females.14 Several variables that might influence the observation of sex differences in opioid antinociception include the efficacy/selectivity of the opioid, the type and intensity of the noxious stimulus, and the genotype of the subject. 5 , 13 , 15 , 29 , 36 , 37 , 49 Sex differences in opioidCorrespondence to: Rebecca M. Craft.Address reprint requests to Rebecca M. Craft, PhD,
Alterations in the balance of functional activity within the serotonin (5-HT) system are hypothesized to underlie impulse control. Cocaine-dependent subjects consistently demonstrate greater impulsivity relative to non-drug using control subjects. Preclinical studies suggest that the 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) contributes to the regulation of impulsive behavior and also mediates some of the behavioral effects of cocaine. We hypothesized that the selective 5-HT2AR antagonist M100907 would reduce inherent levels of impulsivity and attenuate impulsive responding induced by cocaine in two animal models of impulsivity, the differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) task and the one-choice serial reaction time (1-CSRT) task. M100907 reduced rates of responding in the DRL task and premature responding in the 1-CSRT task. Conversely, cocaine disrupted rates of responding in the DRL task and increased premature responding in the 1-CSRT task. M100907 attenuated cocaine-induced increases in specific markers of behavioral disinhibition in the DRL and 1-CSRT tasks. These results suggest that the 5-HT2AR regulates inherent impulsivity, and that blockade of the 5-HT2AR alleviates specific aspects of elevated levels of impulsivity induced by cocaine exposure. These data point to the 5-HT2AR as an important regulatory substrate in impulse control.
Morphine was administered to Sprague-Dawley rats twice daily at 0, 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg/ injection during Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; responding for medial forebrain bundle stimulation was assessed 1, 2, and 3 hr after morning injections in female versus male rats. There were no sex differences in responding under control conditions (Week 1). Morphine's effect on response rate depended on dose, time post-injection, stimulation frequency, and day of treatment. Significant sex differences in morphine's effects occurred at 10 mg/kg, which decreased responding more in males at 1 hr and increased responding more in females at 2 hr, at some frequencies and on some test days. Similar trends were observed at other frequencies, test days, and doses. Morphine's differential effect in males versus females in this procedure suggests that sex comparisons of opioid effects in many animal models may be influenced by sex differences in opioid effects on behavioral output.
Previous studies have produced mixed results about the role of the ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray and parabrachial nucleus in morphine discriminations, perhaps owing to the considerably different methodologies used. The purpose of the present study was to compare the roles of these three brain areas using the same food-reinforced discrimination protocol, to determine whether the schedule of reinforcement influenced maximal substitution produced by site-specific morphine administration and to determine whether the time course of substitution differed by site of morphine administration. Rats were trained to discriminate 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneous morphine from saline under variable interval 15-s or fixed ratio 10 schedules of food reinforcement. Rats were then implanted with one cannula aimed at the lateral ventricle (intracerebroventricular) and one aimed at the ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray or parabrachial nucleus. Morphine discrimination curves were obtained by subcutaneous, intracerebroventricular and intrasite routes. When administered subcutaneously, morphine was equipotent in variable interval-trained and fixed ratio-trained rats, although it was more potent in fixed ratio-trained females than fixed ratio-trained males. When administered intracerebroventricularly, morphine (0.3-10 microg) engendered a maximum average of 63% drug-appropriate responding in both variable interval-trained and fixed ratio-trained rats; females showed significantly greater drug-appropriate responding than males, again under the fixed ratio but not under the variable interval schedule. In variable interval-trained rats, intrasite infusions of morphine (0.3-10 microg) produced maximal drug-appropriate responding of approximately 57% (ventral tegmental area), 56% (periaqueductal gray) and 41% (parabrachial nucleus); mean maximal substitution was slightly (< or = 17%) greater in fixed ratio-trained rats. When injected into the ventral tegmental area or periaqueductal gray, but not the parabrachial nucleus, naloxone methiodide (2 microg) significantly decreased drug-appropriate responding following 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneous morphine, in both variable interval-trained and fixed ratio-trained rats. The time course of the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine differed among the three brain sites: intraventral tegmental area morphine produced peak drug-appropriate responding by 15 min after injection, whereas the discriminative stimulus effects of intraperiaqueductal gray and intraparabrachial nucleus morphine peaked at approximately 60 min after injection. Taken together, these results indicate that ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray and parabrachial nucleus each play a role in the ability of morphine to function as a discriminative stimulus, regardless of the sex of the subject or the schedule under which the subjects are responding. Ventral tegmental area and periaqueductal gray, however, appear to be more critical than parabrachial nucleus in mediating the discriminative effects of systemic morphine i...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.