Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastases-directed therapies can delay the initiation or switch of systemic treatments and allow local control (LC) and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with lymph nodes (LN) oligometastases. We performed a systematic review on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this setting. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS were selected. Data on ADT-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity were also collected from the selected studies. Fifteen studies were eligible (414 patients), 14 of them were retrospective analyses. A high heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient selection and treatment. In one study SBRT was delivered as a single 20 Gy fraction, while in the others the median total dose ranged between 24 and 40 Gy delivered in 3–6 fractions. LC and PFS were reported in 15 and 12 papers, respectively. LC was reported as a crude percentage in 13 studies, with 100% rate in seven and 63.2–98.0% in six reports. Five studies reported actuarial LC (2-year LC: 70.0–100%). PFS was reported as a crude rate in 11 studies (range 27.3–68.8%). Actuarial 2-year PFS was reported in four studies (range 30.0–50.0%). SBRT tolerability was excellent, with only two patients with grade 3 acute toxicity and two patients with grade 3 late toxicity. SBRT for LN oligorecurrences from PCa in safe and provides optimal LC. However, the long-term effect on PFS and OS is still unclear as well as which patients are the best candidate for this approach.

Severe pain is frequent in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDCA). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides high local control rates in these patients. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the available evidence on pain relief in patients with PDCA. We updated our previous systematic review through a search on PubMed of papers published from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2021. Studies with full available text, published in English, and reporting pain relief after SBRT on PDCA were included in this analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the MEDCALC statistical software. All tests were two-sided. The I2 statistic was used to quantify statistical heterogeneity (high heterogeneity level: >50%). Nineteen papers were included in this updated literature review. None of them specifically aimed at assessing pain and/or quality of life. The rate of analgesics reduction or suspension ranged between 40.0 and 100.0% (median: 60.3%) in six studies. The pooled rate was 71.5% (95% CI, 61.6–80.0%), with high heterogeneity between studies (Q2 test: p < 0.0001; I2 = 83.8%). The rate of complete response of pain after SBRT ranged between 30.0 and 81.3% (median: 48.4%) in three studies. The pooled rate was 51.9% (95% CI, 39.3–64.3%), with high heterogeneity (Q2 test: p < 0.008; I2 = 79.1%). The rate of partial plus complete pain response ranged between 44.4 and 100% (median: 78.6%) in nine studies. The pooled rate was 78.3% (95% CI, 71.0–84.5%), with high heterogeneity (Q2 test: p < 0.0001; I2 = 79.4%). A linear regression with sensitivity analysis showed significantly improved overall pain response as the EQD2α/β:10 increases (p: 0.005). Eight papers did not report any side effect during and after SBRT. In three studies only transient acute effects were recorded. The results of the included studies showed high heterogeneity. However, SBRT of PDCA resulted reasonably effective in producing pain relief in these patients. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of SBRT in this setting based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Evidence on prophylactic radiotherapy (RT) in hip heterotopic ossification (HO) is sparse and conflicting.The aim of this literature review was to collect and summarize the available data on RT efficacy in preventing hip HO. The results of this review show that RT is effective in the prevention of hip HO, albeit with large variability across series. Effective prophylactic RT requires optimal treatment fields and time intervals with surgery. On the contrary, there is no clear evidence on the optimal timing (post-operative versus pre-operative RT). Comparisons between prophylactic RT and use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs showed conflicting results, although most were in favor of RT. In conclusion, RT is an established prophylactic treatment for hip HO. However, optimal dose, technique and timing remain unclear, as does the usefulness of combining RT with drugs.Heterotopic ossification (HO) is defined as the formation of new bone in soft tissue outside the skeletal system (1). HO can be differentiated into three main groups: traumatic HO (mainly following fractures), non-traumatic HO (usually occurring after burns), and neurological HO (2).Several prophylactic treatments for HO have been proposed, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Noggin (an extracellular peptide that binds and antagonizes bone morphogenetic proteins), pulsed electromagnetic fields, and free radical scavengers (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).HO is a particularly frequent complication after total hip arthroplasty, with reported rates ranging from 15% to 90%. In patients with a significant amount of ossification, hip mobility can be impaired (12). Main risk factors for HO after total hip arthroplasty are male gender, hip ankylosis, and previous history of HO (13,14). The only effective treatment of symptomatic, established HO is surgical resection (15).From the early 1980s ( 16), radiotherapy (RT) has been extensively studied and used in this setting. Most evidence on RT efficacy in preventing hip HO comes from nonrandomized studies (17-45), although some randomized trials (46-61) and systematic-reviews and meta-analyses (62-68) have been performed.However, evidence on prophylactic RT is sparse and conflicting, no international guidelines are available, and several questions remain unanswered. Therefore, the aim of this literature review was to collect and summarize the main available evidence on RT efficacy in preventing hip HO.

Preserving cognitive functions is a priority for most patients with brain metastases. Knowing the mechanisms of hyperglutamatergic neurotoxicity and the role of some hippocampal areas in cognitive decline (CD) led to testing both the antiglutamatergic pharmacological prophylaxis and hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) techniques. These studies showed a relative reduction in CD four to six months after WBRT. However, the failure to achieve statistical significance in one study that tested memantine alone (RTOG 0614) led to widespread skepticism about this drug in the WBRT setting. Moreover, interest grew in the reasons for the strong patient dropout rates in the first few months after WBRT and for early CD onset. In fact, the latter can only partially be explained by subclinical tumor progression. An emerging interpretation of the (not only) cognitive impairment during and immediately after WBRT is the dysfunction of the limbic and hypothalamic system with its immune and hormonal consequences. This new understanding of WBRT-induced toxicity may represent the basis for further innovative trials. These studies should aim to: (i) evaluate in greater detail the cognitive effects and, more generally, the quality of life impairment during and immediately after WBRT; (ii) study the mechanisms producing these early effects; (iii) test in clinical studies, the modern and advanced WBRT techniques based on both hippocampal-sparing and hypothalamic-pituitary-sparing, currently evaluated only in planning studies; (iv) test new timings of antiglutamatergic drugs administration aimed at preventing not only late toxicity but also acute effects.