Since 18p- was first described in 1963, much progress has been made in our understanding of this classic deletion condition. We have been able to establish a fairly complete picture of the phenotype when the deletion breakpoint occurs at the centromere, and we are working to establish the phenotypic effects when each gene on 18p is hemizygous. Our aim is to provide genotype-specific anticipatory guidance and recommendations to families with an 18p- diagnosis. In addition, establishing the molecular underpinnings of the condition will potentially suggest targets for molecular treatments. Thus, the next step is to establish the precise effects of specific gene deletions. As we look forward to deepening our understanding of 18p-, our focus will continue to be on the establishment of robust genotype-phenotype correlations and the penetrance of these phenotypes. We will continue to follow our 18p- cohort closely as they age to determine the presence or absence of some of these diagnoses, including spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), and dystonia. We will also continue to refine the critical regions for other phenotypes as we enroll additional (hopefully informative) participants into the research study and as the mechanisms of the genes in these regions are elucidated. Mouse models will also be developed to further our understanding of the effects of hemizygosity as well as to serve as models for treatment development.

Thus far, the phenotype of tetrasomy 18p has been primarily delineated by published case series and reports. Findings reported in more than 25% of these cases include neonatal feeding problems, growth retardation, microcephaly, strabismus, muscle tone abnormalities, scoliosis/kyphosis, and variants on brain MRI. Developmental delays and cognitive impairment are universally present. The purpose of this study was to more fully describe tetrasomy 18p at both the genotypic and the phenotypic levels. Array CGH was performed on 43 samples from individuals with tetrasomy 18p diagnosed via routine karyotype. The medical records of 42 of these 43 individuals were reviewed. In order to gain additional phenotypic data, 31 individuals with tetrasomy 18p underwent a series of clinical evaluations at the Chromosome 18 Clinical Research Center. Results from the molecular analysis indicated that 42 of 43 samples analyzed had 4 copies of the entire p arm of chromosome 18; one individual was also trisomic for a section of proximal 18q. The results of the medical records review and clinical evaluations expand the phenotypic description of tetrasomy 18p to include neonatal jaundice and respiratory distress; recurrent otitis media; hearing loss; seizures; refractive errors; constipation and gastroesophageal reflux; cryptorchidism; heart defects; and foot anomalies. Additional findings identified in a small number of individuals include hernias, myelomeningocele, kidney defects, short stature, and failure to respond to growth hormone stimulation testing. Additionally, a profile of dysmorphic features is described. Lastly, a series of clinical evaluations to be considered for individuals with tetrasomy 18p is suggested.

Providing clinically relevant prognoses and treatment information for people with a chromsome18q deletion is particularly challenging because every unrelated person has a unique region of hemizygosity. The hemizygous region can involve almost any region of 18q including between 1 and 101 genes (30 Mb of DNA). Most individuals have terminal deletions, but in our cohort of over 350 individuals 23% have interstitial deletions. Because of this heterogeneity, we take a gene by gene approach to understanding the clinical consequences. There are 196 genes on 18q. We classified 133 of them as dosage insensitive, 15 (8%) as dosage sensitive leading to haploinsufficiency while another 10 (5%) have effects that are conditionally haploinsufficient and are dependent on another factor, genetic or environmental in order to cause an abnormal phenotype. Thirty-seven genes (19%) have insufficient information to classify their dosage effect. Phenotypes attributed to single genes include: congenital heart disease, minor bone morphology changes, central nervous system dysmyelination, expressive speech delay, vesicouretreral reflux, polyposis, Pitt-Hopkins syndrome, intellectual disability, executive function impairment, male infertility, aural atresia, and high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Additionally, identified critical regions for other phenotypes include: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and pectus excavatum, Virchow-Robin perivascular spaces, small corpus callosum, strabismus, atopic disorders, mood disorder, IgA deficiency, nystagmus, congenital heart disease, kidney malformation, vertical talus, CNS dysmyelination growth hormone deficiency and cleft palate. Together these findings make it increasingly feasible to compile an individualized syndrome description based on each person's individuated genotype. Future work will focus on understanding molecular mechanisms leading to treatment.

Most deletions of the long arm of chromosome 18 involve some part of the most distal 30 Mb. We have identified five individuals with cytogenetically diagnosed interstitial deletions that are all proximal to this commonly deleted region. The extent of their deletions was characterized using molecular and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Each participant was assessed under the comprehensive clinical evaluation protocol of the Chromosome 18 Clinical Research Center. Three of the five individuals were found to have apparently identical interstitial deletions between positions of 37.5 and 42.5 Mb (18q12.3 → 18q21.1). One individual's deletion was much larger and extended from a more proximal breakpoint position of 23 Mb (18q11.2) to a more distal breakpoint at 43 Mb (18q21.1). The fifth individual had a proximal breakpoint identical to the other three, but a distal breakpoint at 43.5 Mb (18q21.1). The clinical findings were of interest because the three individuals with the smaller deletions lacked major anomalies. All five individuals were developmentally delayed; however, the discrepancy between their expressive and receptive language abilities was striking, with expressive language being much more severely affected. This leads us to hypothesize that there are genes in this region of chromosome 18 that are specific to the neural and motor planning domains necessary for speech. Additionally, this may represent a previously underappreciated syndrome since these children do not have the typical clinical abnormalities that would lead to a chromosome analysis. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Deletions of the short arm of chromosome 18 have been well-described in case reports. However, the utility of these descriptions in clinical practice is limited by varied and imprecise breakpoints. As we work to establish genotype-phenotype correlations for 18p-, it is critical to have accurate and complete clinical descriptions of individuals with differing breakpoints. In addition, the developmental profile of 18p- has not been well-delineated. We undertook a thorough review of the medical histories of 31 individuals with 18p- and a breakpoint in the centromeric region. We collected developmental data using mailed surveys and questionnaires. The most common findings included neonatal complications; cardiac anomalies; hypotonia; MRI abnormalities; endocrine dysfunction; strabismus; ptosis; and refractive errors. Less common features included holoprosencephaly and its microforms; hearing loss; and orthopedic anomalies. The developmental effects of the deletion appear to be less severe than reported in the literature, as average IQ scores were in the range of borderline intellectual functioning. Based on responses to standardized questionnaires, it appears this population has marked difficulty with activities of daily living, though several young adults were able to live independent of their parents. This manuscript represents the most comprehensive description of a cohort of 18p- individuals with identical breakpoints. Despite identical breakpoints, a great deal of phenotype variability remained among this population, suggesting that many of the genes on 18p- cause low-penetrance phenotypes when present in a hemizygous state. Future efforts will focus on the clinical description of individuals with more distal breakpoints and the identification of critical regions and candidate genes.

Although constitutional chromosome abnormalities have been recognized since the 1960s, clinical characterization and development of treatment options have been hampered by their obvious genetic complexity and relative rarity. Additionally, deletions of 18q are particularly heterogeneous, with no two people having the same breakpoints. We identified sixteen individuals with deletions that, despite unique breakpoints, encompass the same set of genes within a 17.6 Mb region. This group represents the most genotypically similar group yet identified with distal 18q deletions. As the deletion is of average size when compared with other 18q deletions, this group can serve as a reference point for the clinical and molecular description of this condition. We performed a thorough medical record review as well as a series of clinical evaluations on 14 of the 16 individuals. Common functional findings included developmental delays, hypotonia, growth hormone deficiency, and hearing loss. Structural anomalies included foot anomalies, ear canal atresia/stenosis, and hypospadias. The majority of individuals performed within the low normal range of cognitive ability but had more serious deficits in adaptive abilities. Of interest, the hemizygous region contains 38 known genes, 26 of which are sufficiently understood to tentatively determine dosage sensitivity. Published data suggest that 20 are unlikely to cause an abnormal phenotype in the hemizygous state and five are likely to be dosage sensitive: TNX3, NETO1, ZNF407, TSHZ1, and NFATC. A sixth gene, ATP9B, may be conditionally dosage sensitive. Not all distal 18q- phenotypes can be attributed to these six genes; however, this is an important advance in the molecular characterization of 18q deletions.

A passive sampler designed to measure per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) was evaluated to determine chemical uptake rates under a variety of conditions. The sampler design is simple and robust, using organosilica modified with cross-linked amine polymer in an high density polyethylene housing retained with polypropylene mesh. The addition of amine groups as a weak ionexchange resin in combination with Cu 2+ was designed to promote binding of short-chain PFAS. A five-fold improvement in perfluorobutanoic acid adsorption was measured when Cu 2+ was added to the polyethylenimine polymer. The samplers showed an integrated response to all analytes tested except for shortchain PFAS. Sampling rates of PFAS analytes from simulated groundwater were on average 10 mL/day at flow rates of 0.038-1.9 cm/min. Relatively low variability in sampling rate was observed over the range of laboratory tested conditions (representing common conditions in environmental waters) including elevated ionic strength, sulfate concentration, and humic acid content.

The Mineral Trap, or Min‐Trap™, is a monitoring well‐based sampler designed to collect direct physical evidence of reactive mineral formation in situ without collecting soil or rock core samples. The Min‐Trap consists of a nonreactive granular medium (e.g., silica sand) within water‐permeable mesh pillows that are supported inside a slotted polyvinyl chloride housing that is incubated within a conventional monitoring well. The primary objective of the Min‐Trap in this application is to collect reactive minerals that are forming in the aquifer in a retrievable format that can be submitted for laboratory analysis. To evaluate the capability of Min‐Traps to capture reactive iron minerals, both a laboratory tank test and a field test were conducted. Both tests confirmed that iron sulfide minerals form in the Min‐Trap under sulfate reducing conditions within several weeks. Analysis of the precipitated minerals via the AMIBA analysis suite showed that they almost entirely consisted of weak acid soluble (biogenic, microcrystalline) ferrous iron‐based minerals, and at least two thirds of the sulfur‐containing minerals were monosulfides (i.e., mackinawite) at the end of each test. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the colocation of iron and sulfur in the mineral masses. The dominance of the ferrous iron and reduced sulfur verifies that little to no oxidation of the captured minerals occurred between sample collection and analysis. A subsurface soil core was collected during the field test next to the Min‐Trap‐containing well. AMIBA results were consistent between the native soil and the Min‐Trap except for much higher strong acid soluble (crystalline) ferric iron in the native soil when compared to the silica sand of the Min‐Trap, as expected. This work shows that Min‐Traps are useful for documenting the formation of reactive iron sulfides (FeSx) that can form during in situ anaerobic biostimulation and can drive complementary abiotic treatment of chlorinated volatile organic compounds. Mineralogical data obtained from Min‐Traps can be applied to assess remedial objectives at several stages of the remedial program, including initial characterization, alternatives evaluation, feasibility testing, remedy optimization, and transition from active treatment to passive remedial methods.