As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to unfold, guidelines related to the delivery of medical and cancer care are being disseminated in an effort to flatten the curve of transmission while continuing to provide appropriate guideline based care for cancer patients. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unique in its location in the upper aerodigestive tract, a known location that harbors SARS-Cov2, the causative virus in COVID-19. Otolaryngologists and associated multidisciplinary team members caring for head and neck cancer patients are at heightened risk of transmission through mucus, blood, and aerosolized particles. A high rate of transmission to otolaryngologists has been reported in China, Italy, and Iran, with reports of morbidity and death [1]. The limited availability of COVID-19 testing, personal protective equipment (PPE), disposable medical supplies, hospital and ICU beds, ventilators, and ancillary staff force clinicians to triage which procedures are "essential" and which can be safely delayed. Healthcare providers who contract the virus have generally been mandated to selfquarantine, thereby reducing the availability of the hospital workforce. In the midst of the ongoing pandemic, patients diagnosed with HNSCC now have the added stress in how COVID-19 will impact their care and treatment. The current evidence supports that cancer patients have a higher risk of infection and serious complications from COVID-19 relative to other patient subgroups [2]. Uncertainties such as whether treatment will continue and how these high risk patients will continue to access services, are being addressed as the situation continues to evolve. Patients, physicians, health care workers, health care systems, ethicists, and attorneys among others have become aware of the number of complex dilemmas and issues that have arisen during this pandemic that include but are not limited to the following:

No abstract

Background Rhinologic disease can be responsible for systemic symptoms affecting mood, cognition, and sleep. It is unclear whether sleep disturbance in specific rhinologic disorders (chronic rhinosinusitis [CRS], rhinitis, and nasal septal deviation [NSD]) is an obstructive phenomenon or due to other mechanisms. In this review we examine the impact of CRS, rhinitis, and NSD on objective and subjective sleep outcome metrics and draw comparisons to normal controls and patients with known obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods A systematic review of 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) was performed. Studies reporting on objective (apnea‐hypopnea index [AHI], respiratory disturbance index [RDI], oxygen nadir) and subjective (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [EpSS], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS]) sleep parameters and disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs; 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22], Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [RQLQ], Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation [NOSE]) were included. Results The database search yielded 1414 unique articles, of which 103 were included for analysis. Baseline PROMs were at the high end of normal to abnormal for all 3 conditions: EpSS: CRS (9.8 ± 4.0), rhinitis (9.7 ± 4.3), and NSD (8.9 ± 4.6); and PSQI: CRS (11.0 ± 4.5), rhinitis (6.1 ± 3.7), and NSD (8.6 ± 3.5). Objective measures demonstrated a mild to moderate OSA in the studied diseases: AHI: CRS (10.4 ± 11.5), rhinitis (8.6 ± 8.8), and NSD (13.0 ± 6.9). There were significant differences when compared with reported norms in all measured outcomes (p < 0.001). Conclusion Sleep quality is impacted by rhinologic (CRS, rhinitis, NSD) disease. There is likely a mild obstructive component contributing to poor sleep, but other contributing factors may be involved.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

No abstract