The nature of the biological relationships between cancers and allergies has intrigued researchers and health care providers for five decades. Three hypotheses have been proposed: antigenic stimulation predicts positive associations between cancers and allergies (i.e., allergy sufferers are more likely to get cancer), whereas immunosurveillance and prophylaxis predict inverse associations (i.e., allergy sufferers are less likely to get cancer). Immunosurveillance predicts inverse associations for cancers of all tissues and organ systems, and prophylaxis predicts inverse associations specifically for cancers of tissues and organ systems that interface with the external environment. To comparatively evaluate these hypotheses, we comprehensively reviewed the literature on cancer and allergies. We located 148 papers published from 1955 through 2006 that reported results of 463 studies of relationships between patients' histories of 11 specific allergies and cancers of 19 tissues and organ systems, and 183 studies of patients' histories of multiple allergies in relation to various types/sites of cancers. Analyses of these studies revealed that (1) frequencies of positive, inverse, and null allergy-cancer associations differed considerably among cancers of different tissues and organ systems; (2) more than twice as many studies reported inverse allergy-cancer associations as reported positive associations; (3) inverse associations were particularly common for cancers of the mouth and throat, brain glia, colon and rectum, pancreas, skin, and cervix but (4) particularly rare for cancers of the breast, prostate, and brain meninges, and for myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and myelocytic leukemia; (5) lung cancer was positively associated with asthma but inversely associated with other allergies; (6) inverse associations with allergies were more than twice as common for cancers of nine tissues and organ systems that interface with the external environment compared to cancers of nine tissues and organ systems that do not interface with the external environment; and (7) eczema, hives, and allergies to animal dander and food were most frequently inversely associated with cancers of tissues that interface with the external environment. Taken together, these results are more consistent with the prophylaxis hypothesis than the two alternatives. IgE is a widespread and ancient immunoglobulin isotype in mammals, occurring among all known marsupials, monotremes, and eutherians. The IgE system and its associated allergy symptoms may serve a common protective function: the rapid expulsion of pathogens, dangerous natural toxins, and other carcinogenic antigens before they can trigger malignant neoplasia in exposed tissues.

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) secondary to in-utero opioid exposure is an increasing problem. Variability in assessment and treatment of NAS has been attributed to the lack of high-quality evidence to guide management of exposed neonates. This systematic review examines available evidence for NAS assessment tools, nonpharmacologic interventions, and pharmacologic management of opioid-exposed infants. There is limited data on the inter-observer reliability of NAS assessment tools due to lack of a standardized approach. In addition, most scales were developed prior to the prevalent use of prescribed prenatal concomitant medications, which can complicate NAS assessment. Nonpharmacologic interventions, particularly breastfeeding, may decrease NAS severity. Opioid medications such as morphine or methadone are recommended as first-line therapy, with phenobarbital or clonidine as second-line adjunctive therapy. Further research is needed to determine best practices for assessment, nonpharmacologic intervention, and pharmacologic management of infants with NAS in order to improve outcomes.

Objectives To compare classification of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) using self-reported pre-pregnancy weight versus weight measured at the first prenatal visit. Methods Retrospective cohort of 307 women receiving prenatal care at the faculty and resident obstetric clinics at a Massachusetts tertiary-care center. Eligible women initiated prenatal care prior to 14 weeks gestation and delivered singleton infants between April 2007 and March 2008. Results On average, self-reported weight was 4 pounds lighter than measured weight at the first prenatal visit (SD: 7.2 pounds; range: 19 pounds lighter to 35 pounds heavier). Using self-reported pre-pregnancy weight to calculate pre-pregnancy BMI, 4.2% of women were underweight, 48.9% were normal weight, 25.4% were overweight, and 21.5% were obese. Using weight measured at first prenatal visit, these were 3.6%, 45.3%, 26.4%, and 24.8%, respectively. Classification of pre-pregnancy BMI was concordant for 87% of women (weighted kappa = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81 – 0.90). Women gained an average of 32.1 pounds (SD: 18.0 pounds) during pregnancy. Of the 13% of the sample with discrepant BMI classification, 74% gained within the same adherence category when comparing weight gain to Institute of Medicine recommendations. Conclusions For the vast majority of women, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured weight at first prenatal visit resulted in identical classification of pre-pregnancy BMI. In absence of measured pre-pregnancy weight, we recommend that providers calculate both values and discuss discrepancies with their pregnant patients, as significant weight loss or gain during the first trimester may indicate a need for additional oversight with potential intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of eliminating the routine use of oral opioids for postcesarean delivery analgesia on postcesarean opioid consumption. METHODS: At a tertiary care center, we implemented a quality improvement intervention among faculty practice patients undergoing cesarean delivery, which consisted of 1) eliminating routine ordering of oral opioids after cesarean delivery, 2) implementing guidelines for ordering a short course of opioids when deemed necessary, and 3) coupling opioid prescribing at discharge to patterns of opioid use in-hospital combined with shared decision-making. All patients, both before and after the intervention, were administered neuraxial opioids and scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications in the absence of contraindications. The primary outcome was the percentage of women who used any opioids postoperatively in-hospital. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of women discharged with a prescription for opioids, the quantity of opioids used in-hospital, pain scores, satisfaction, opioid-related side effects, and opioid prescriptions ordered in the 6 weeks after delivery. The effects of this intervention were assessed based on a chart review of patient data and a survey of patients in the 12 weeks before and 12 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: We evaluated the records of 191 postcesarean delivery patients before and 181 after the intervention. Less than half of women used oral opioids in-hospital after the intervention, 82 (45%) compared with 130 (68%) before (P<.001). However, there was no change in pain scores or overall satisfaction with pain relief. Postintervention, only 40% of patients were discharged with prescriptions for opioids compared with 91% of patients before the intervention (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Eliminating routine ordering of oral opioids after cesarean delivery is associated with a significant decrease in opioid consumption while maintaining the same levels of pain control and patient satisfaction. Oral opioids are not needed by a large proportion of women after cesarean delivery.