We and others have reported that the anticancer activity of L-asparaginase (ASNase) against asparagine synthetase (ASNS)-positive cell types requires ASNase glutaminase activity, whereas anticancer activity against ASNS-negative cell types does not. Here, we attempted to disentangle the relationship between asparagine metabolism, glutamine metabolism, and downstream pathways that modulate cell viability by testing the hypothesis that ASNase anticancer activity is based on asparagine depletion rather than glutamine depletion per se. We tested ASNase wild-type (ASNase WT) and its glutaminase-deficient Q59L mutant (ASNase Q59L) and found that ASNase glutaminase activity contributed to durable anticancer activity against xenografts of the ASNS-negative Sup-B15 leukemia cell line in NOD/SCID gamma mice, whereas asparaginase activity alone yielded a mere growth delay. Our findings suggest that ASNase glutaminase activity is necessary for durable, single-agent anticancer activity in vivo, even against ASNS-negative cancer types.
Histone acetylation and methylation play an important role in the regulation of gene expression. Irregular patterns of histone global acetylation and methylation have frequently been seen in various diseases. Quantitative analysis of these patterns is of high value for the evaluation of disease development and of outcomes from therapeutic treatment. Targeting histone acetylation and methylation by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) is one of the current quantitative methods. Here, we reported the use of the multiplexed parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) method on the QExactive mass spectrometer to target previously known lysine acetylation and methylation sites of histone H3 and H4 for the purpose of establishing precursor-product pairs for SRM. 55 modified peptides among which 29 were H3 K27/K36 modified peptides were detected from 24 targeted precursor ions included in the inclusion list. The identification was carried out directly from the trypsin digests of core histones that were separated without derivatization on a homemade capillary column packed with Waters YMC ODS-AQ reversed phase materials. Besides documenting the higher-energy c-trap dissociation (HCD) MS(2) spectra of previously known histone H3/H4 acetylated and methylated tryptic peptides, we identified novel H3 K18 methylation, H3 K27 monomethyl/acetyl duel modifications, H2B K23 acetylation, and H4 K20 acetylation in mammalian histones. The information gained from these experiments sets the foundation for quantification of histone modifications by targeted mass spectrometry methods directly from core histone samples.
L-asparaginase (ASNase) is a standard component of treatment regimens used for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is being tested against other cancer types, including acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and pancreatic cancer. We and others have reported that the anticancer activity of ASNase requires the enzyme's glutaminase activity, but the underlying glutaminase-mediated mechanism(s) that lead to leukemia cell death are unknown. Glutamine, the most abundant amino acid in the blood, is known for pleiotropic roles in numerous biological pathways, including energy metabolism, redox metabolism, nucleotide anabolism, and amino acid anabolism. Many cancer cells have been found to reprogram their metabolic pathways to become highly dependent on glutamine for survival and proliferation. Glutaminase (GLS/GLS2)-mediated conversion of glutamine to glutamic acid provides the latter as a substrate for conversion to α‐ketoglutarate by transaminases or glutamate dehydrogenases (GLUD1/GLUD2) to fuel the TCA cycle. Consequently, targeting glutamine metabolism has become an attractive strategy for anticancer therapy. The enzyme asparagine synthetase (ASNS) mediates resistance to ASNase through synthesis of asparagine. ASNS is expressed in most cell types, and its expression is upregulated in response to a wide variety of cell stresses, including amino acid limitation and endoplasmic reticulum stress. We and others have shown that ASNS-positive leukemia cells capable of synthesizing asparagine de novo are less responsive than ASNS-negative leukemia cells to ASNase therapy (Chan et al., Blood, 2014). Moreover, ASNase resistance has been associated with elevated ASNS expression. In fact, we have shown that ASNS expression is a predictive marker of the in vitro response of leukemia cell lines and some solid tumor cell types to ASNase. The expression of ASNS in most cells in the body poses a serious challenge for successful therapy with ASNase; for example, production of asparagine by the liver and cells (e.g., mesenchymal stem cells and adipocytes) of the tumor microenvironment may contribute significantly to ASNase resistance in vivo. Here we used the high-glutaminase E. chrysanthemi ASNase (Erwinaze®), wild-type E. coli ASNase (ASNaseWT), and the glutaminase-deficient E. coli mutant, ASNaseQ59L, as models of high, medium-, and low-glutaminase, respectively, to explore ASNase glutaminase activity-mediated mechanisms of leukemia cell death. Unexpectedly, we found that increasing glutaminase activity caused an increase in the suppression of ASNS upregulation in vitro (Figure 1A). In NSG mice injected with luciferase-labeled Sup-B15 cells, single-agent ASNaseWT yielded a durable response approximating cure, whereas glutaminase-deficient ASNaseQ59L yielded a complete response but with recurrence. Together, the results suggest that ASNase glutaminase activity is associated with suppression of ASNS upregulation, making durable, single-agent anticancer activity easier to achieve. Overall, the results provide new insight into the mechanism of action of ASNase. Disclosures Konopleva: Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Weinstein:NIH: Patents & Royalties: L-asparaginase. Lorenzi:Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; NIH: Patents & Royalties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.