Increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 will interact with other environmental factors to influence the physiology and ecology of trees. This research evaluated how plant phytochemical responses to enriched atmospheric CO 2 are affected by the availability of soil nitrate (NO 3 Ϫ ) and how these chemical changes, in turn, alter the performance of a tree-feeding folivore. Seedlings of three deciduous tree species-quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), red oak (Quercus rubra), and sugar maple (Acer saccharum)-were grown in ambient (355 L/L) or elevated (650 L/L) CO 2 in combination with low (1.25 mmol/L) or high (7.5 mmol/L) soil NO 3 Ϫ availability. After 60 d, foliage was analyzed for changes in nutrients and allelochemicals likely to be influenced by the availability of CO 2 and NO 3 Ϫ . Penultimate gypsy moth larvae (Lymantria dispar) were reared on foliage (aspen and maple) to determine how performance would be affected by host chemical changes.Using the framework of carbon-nutrient balance (CNB) theory, we tested three hypotheses regarding the impact of CO 2 and NO 3 Ϫ availability on plant chemistry and insect performance:(1) nitrogen-based compounds will decrease, and carbon-based compounds will increase in response to elevated CO 2 and/or low NO 3 Ϫ ; (2) aspen will exhibit the greatest change in C:N ratios, and maple the least; and (3) phytochemical changes will influence gypsy moth performance, with larvae fed aspen being affected more than those fed maple.Concentrations of nitrogen and soluble protein decreased, whereas concentrations of starch, condensed tannins, and ellagitannins increased, in response to elevated CO 2 and/or low NO 3 Ϫ . Responses of simple carbohydrates and phenolic glycosides were variable, however, suggesting that foliar accumulations of ''dynamic metabolites'' do not follow the predictions of CNB theory as well as do those of stable end products. With respect to Hypothesis 2, we found that absolute (net) changes in foliar C:N ratios were greatest for aspen and least for oak, whereas relative (proportional) changes were greatest for maple and least for aspen. Thus, Hypothesis 2 was only partially supported by the data. Considering Hypothesis 3, we found that elevated CO 2 treatments had little effect on gypsy moth development time, growth rate, or larval mass. Larvae reared on aspen foliage grown under elevated CO 2 exhibited increased consumption but decreased conversion efficiencies. Gypsy moth responses to NO 3 Ϫ were strongly host specific: the highest consumption and food digestibility occurred in larvae on high-NO 3 Ϫ aspen, whereas the fastest growth rates occurred in larvae on high-NO 3 Ϫ maple. In short, our results again only partially supported the predicted pattern. They indicate, however, that the magnitude of insect response elicited by resource-mediated shifts in host chemistry will depend on how levels of compounds with specific importance to insect fitness (e.g., phenolic glycosides in aspen) are affected.Overall, we observed relatively few true interactions (...
Increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO2 will interact with other environmental factors to influence the physiology and ecology of trees. This research evaluated how plant phytochemical responses to enriched atmospheric CO2 are affected by the availability of soil nitrate (NO3−) and how these chemical changes, in turn, alter the performance of a tree‐feeding folivore. Seedlings of three deciduous tree species—quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), red oak (Quercus rubra), and sugar maple (Acer saccharum)—were grown in ambient (355 μL/L) or elevated (650 μL/L) CO2 in combination with low (1.25 mmol/L) or high (7.5 mmol/L) soil NO3− availability. After 60 d, foliage was analyzed for changes in nutrients and allelochemicals likely to be influenced by the availability of CO2 and NO3−. Penultimate gypsy moth larvae (Lymantria dispar) were reared on foliage (aspen and maple) to determine how performance would be affected by host chemical changes. Using the framework of carbon–nutrient balance (CNB) theory, we tested three hypotheses regarding the impact of CO2 and NO3− availability on plant chemistry and insect performance: (1) nitrogen‐based compounds will decrease, and carbon‐based compounds will increase in response to elevated CO2 and/or low NO3−; (2) aspen will exhibit the greatest change in C:N ratios, and maple the least; and (3) phytochemical changes will influence gypsy moth performance, with larvae fed aspen being affected more than those fed maple. Concentrations of nitrogen and soluble protein decreased, whereas concentrations of starch, condensed tannins, and ellagitannins increased, in response to elevated CO2 and/or low NO3−. Responses of simple carbohydrates and phenolic glycosides were variable, however, suggesting that foliar accumulations of “dynamic metabolites” do not follow the predictions of CNB theory as well as do those of stable end products. With respect to Hypothesis 2, we found that absolute (net) changes in foliar C:N ratios were greatest for aspen and least for oak, whereas relative (proportional) changes were greatest for maple and least for aspen. Thus, Hypothesis 2 was only partially supported by the data. Considering Hypothesis 3, we found that elevated CO2 treatments had little effect on gypsy moth development time, growth rate, or larval mass. Larvae reared on aspen foliage grown under elevated CO2 exhibited increased consumption but decreased conversion efficiencies. Gypsy moth responses to NO3− were strongly host specific: the highest consumption and food digestibility occurred in larvae on high‐NO3− aspen, whereas the fastest growth rates occurred in larvae on high‐NO3− maple. In short, our results again only partially supported the predicted pattern. They indicate, however, that the magnitude of insect response elicited by resource‐mediated shifts in host chemistry will depend on how levels of compounds with specific importance to insect fitness (e.g., phenolic glycosides in aspen) are affected. Overall, we observed relatively few true interactions (i.e., nonadditive) between c...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.