More than 2 million people in the United States use a wheelchair for mobility. These Americans not only rely on their assistive technology to complete simple, daily tasks, but they also depend on functional and accessible sidewalks to do so. Although the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines established by the Access Board provide suggestions for pathways, they are subjective and not measurable. This ambiguity results in public pathways with many bumps and cracks, which can lead to harmful whole body vibrations (WBVs) for wheelchair users. WBVs with a root mean squared (RMS) value greater than 1.6 m/s2 for more than a 1-h period may result in back and neck pain or muscle fatigue. For the development of a standard for surface roughness, subjective and objective information needs to be gathered and analyzed. Sixty-one subjects were recruited to travel over nine simulated wooden surfaces with varying roughnesses that were modeled after outdoor surfaces. A subset of the subjects also traveled over six outdoor surfaces. With the use of their own chairs, subjects traveled over each surface while accelerometers recorded vibrations at the seat, footrest, and backrest. After they traveled over each surface, subjects were asked to fill out a short questionnaire on the acceptability of each surface. The vibrations were converted to RMS accelerations. Both RMS accelerations and subject surface ratings were compared with surface roughness. As surface roughness increased, RMS accelerations increased, and subject surface ratings decreased. Some surfaces generated RMS accelerations above the 1.6 m/s2 threshold; this result suggested that some sidewalks caused harmful vibrations to wheelchair users.
In the United States, over three million people use a wheelchair for their primary means of mobility and they rely on functional and accessible pathways to participate in their communities. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines related to pathway roughness are currently ambiguous, subjective and therefore unable to be measured. Consequently, many public pathways are sufficiently rough to result in harmful vibrations and discomfort for wheelchair users. In previous research, subjective ratings and root-mean-square accelerations were reported from subjects traveling over surfaces with various roughnesses in their own wheelchairs. The purpose of the current study is to use previous data to propose roughness thresholds by correlating the roughness of surfaces to vibration data and subjective ratings from wheelchair users. The results suggest a pathway roughness index threshold of ≤50 mm/m (1.2 in./ft) for a surface segment of 100 m (328 ft) in length, and ≤100 mm/m (1.2 in./ft) for a surface segment of 3 m (9.8 ft) in length would protect wheelchair users against discomfort and possible health risks due to vibration exposure. For surfaces of different lengths, a 3 m (9.8 ft) and 100 m (328 ft) moving window should be used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.