BackgroundAtrial fibrillation is associated with higher mortality. Identification of causes of death and contemporary risk factors for all‐cause mortality may guide interventions.Methods and ResultsIn the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose‐adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression with backward elimination identified factors at randomization that were independently associated with all‐cause mortality in the 14 171 participants in the intention‐to‐treat population. The median age was 73 years, and the mean CHADS
2 score was 3.5. Over 1.9 years of median follow‐up, 1214 (8.6%) patients died. Kaplan–Meier mortality rates were 4.2% at 1 year and 8.9% at 2 years. The majority of classified deaths (1081) were cardiovascular (72%), whereas only 6% were nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. No significant difference in all‐cause mortality was observed between the rivaroxaban and warfarin arms (P=0.15). Heart failure (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33–1.70, P<0.0001) and age ≥75 years (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.51–1.90, P<0.0001) were associated with higher all‐cause mortality. Multiple additional characteristics were independently associated with higher mortality, with decreasing creatinine clearance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, male sex, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes being among the most strongly associated (model C‐index 0.677).ConclusionsIn a large population of patients anticoagulated for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, ≈7 in 10 deaths were cardiovascular, whereas <1 in 10 deaths were caused by nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. Optimal prevention and treatment of heart failure, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes may improve survival.Clinical Trial Registration
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.
Background
We sought to assess the impact and predictors of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection and severity in a cohort of congenital heart disease (CHD) patients at a large CHD center in New York City.
Methods and Results
We performed a retrospective review of all individuals with CHD followed at Columbia University Irving Medical Center who were diagnosed with COVID‐19 between 3/1/2020 and 7/1/2020. The primary endpoint was moderate/severe response to COVID‐19 infection defined as a) death during COVID‐19 infection; or 2) need for hospitalization and/or respiratory support secondary to COVID‐19 infection. Among 53 COVID‐19 positive patients with CHD, 10 (19%) were <18 years old (median age 34 years). 31 (58%) had complex congenital anatomy including 10 (19%) with a Fontan repair. Eight (15%) had a genetic syndrome, six (11%) had pulmonary hypertension (PH), and nine (17%) were obese. Among adults, 18 (41%) were physiologic class C or D. For the entire cohort, nine (17%) had a moderate/severe infection, including three deaths (6%). After correcting for multiple comparisons, the presence of a genetic syndrome (OR=35.82: p=0.0002), and in adults, physiological Stage C or D (OR=19.38: p=0.002) were significantly associated with moderate/severe infection.
Conclusions
At our CHD center, the number of symptomatic COVID‐19 patients was relatively low. CHD patients with a genetic syndrome and adults at advanced physiological stage were at highest risk for moderate/severe infection.
Supraventricular tachycardia is the most common tachyarrhythmia encountered in infants. In older children and adults, definitive treatment of the supraventricular tachycardia substrate with catheter ablation is a common approach to management. However, in infants, the risks of catheter ablation are significantly higher, and the patients often outgrow the potential to experience episodes. Therefore, antiarrhythmic medications are often utilized to minimize the likelihood of experiencing episodes. This article reviews the common arrhythmia mechanisms encountered in infants and the medications used to treat these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.