The first convenient care clinics opened in the United States in 2000. Twenty years later, with more than 2,700 locations in 44 states, convenient care has logged more than 40 million patient visits, most of them by family nurse practitioners (FNPs). 1 Few would argue that health care in the United States is in need of innovation, and innovation always brings controversy, opposition, and doubt before it achieves broad acceptance. The numbers alone argue that convenient care is meeting a need that had been unmet previously. The question of drawing a line between urgent/acute care and chronic disease management and suggesting that the latter should take place elsewhere, to my mind, is the wrong question. These are NPs we are talking about. How many NPs would ignore a chronic condition in a patient they happened to be seeing for another problem? When an innovation that is working is criticized, it begs a few questions: How many of those 40 million visits could have been absorbed by already overburdened "traditional" health care resources? How many of those patients would instead have gone without care? How many went to a convenient clinic because they prefer seeing an NP? But are convenient care centers set up to dealing with chronic problems?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.