The accuracy of protein synthesis relies on the ability of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) to discriminate among true and near cognate substrates. To date, analysis of aaRSs function, including identification of residues of aaRS participating in amino acid and tRNA discrimination, has largely relied on the steady state kinetic pyrophosphate exchange and aminoacylation assays. Pre-steady state kinetic studies investigating a more limited set of aaRS systems have also been undertaken to assess the energetic contributions of individual enzyme-substrate interactions, particularly in the adenylation half reaction. More recently, a renewed interest in the use of rapid kinetics approaches for aaRSs has led to their application to several new aaRS systems, resulting in the identification of mechanistic differences that distinguish the two structurally distinct aaRS classes. Here, we review the techniques for thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of aaRS function. Following a brief survey of methods for the preparation of materials and for steady state kinetic analysis, this review will describe pre-steady state kinetic methods employing rapid quench and stopped-flow fluorescence for analysis of the activation and aminoacyl transfer reactions. Application of these methods to any aaRS system allows the investigator to derive detailed kinetic mechanisms for the activation and aminoacyl transfer reactions, permitting issues of substrate specificity, stereochemical mechanism, and inhibitor interaction to be addressed in a rigorous and quantitative fashion.

To test the hypothesis that tRNA Tyr recognition differs between bacterial and human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases, we sequenced several clones identified as human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNAs by the Human Genome Project. We found that human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is composed of three domains: 1) an aminoterminal Rossmann fold domain that is responsible for formation of the activated E⅐Tyr-AMP intermediate and is conserved among bacteria, archeae, and eukaryotes; 2) a tRNA anticodon recognition domain that has not been conserved between bacteria and eukaryotes; and 3) a carboxyl-terminal domain that is unique to the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and whose primary structure is 49% identical to the putative human cytokine endothelial monocyte-activating protein II, 50% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Caenorhabditis elegans, and 43% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of Arc1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The first two domains of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase are 52, 36, and 16% identical to tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from S. cerevisiae, Methanococcus jannaschii, and Bacillus stearothermophilus, respectively. Nine of fifteen amino acids known to be involved in the formation of the tyrosyl-adenylate complex in B. stearothermophilus are conserved across all of the organisms, whereas amino acids involved in the recognition of tRNA Tyr are not conserved. Kinetic analyses of recombinant human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases expressed in Escherichia coli indicate that human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase aminoacylates human but not B. stearothermophilus tRNA Tyr , and vice versa, supporting the original hypothesis. It is proposed that like endothelial monocyte-activating protein II and the carboxyl-terminal domain of Arc1p, the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyltRNA synthetase evolved from gene duplication of the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase and may direct tRNA to the active site of the enzyme.Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of tRNA by their cognate amino acid. For most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (E), tRNA aminoacylation can be separated into two steps: formation of a stable enzyme-bound aminoacyladenylate intermediate (E⅐AA-AMP, Equation 1), followed by transfer of the amino acid (AA) from the aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate to the 3Ј end of the tRNA substrate (Equation 2).The 20 different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases fall into two distinct structural classes (1, 2). Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (of which tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is a member) are characterized by a structurally well conserved amino-terminal Rossmann fold domain which contains the signature sequences "HIGH" and "KMSKS" (3, 4). In contrast, the carboxyl-terminal domains of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are structurally diverse suggesting that the primordial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase consisted solely of the amino-terminal Rossmann fold (5-8). Both x-ray crystallography and site-directed mutagenesis of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthet...

A mobile loop in tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, which corresponds to the KMSKS signature sequence of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, destabilizes the E.Tyr.ATP complex but stabilizes the following E.[Tyr-ATP]not equal to transition state for the formation of E.Tyr-AMP. Three amino acid residues in the mobile loop, K230, K233, and T234, are known to be primarily responsible for these effects. We now analyze the network of interactions between these three amino acids using multiple mutant free energy cycles. The complete characterization of the coupling energies within the mobile loop allows each of the steps leading to the formation of the transition state complex to be dissected into its energetic components. In particular, it is found that, in the absence of a functional mobile loop, there is synergistic coupling between the tyrosine and ATP substrates (i.e., each enhances the binding affinity of the other) which stabilizes the E.Tyr.ATP intermediate preceding the transition state complex. Thus, the mobile loop disrupts the synergism between the ATP and tyrosine substrates, using the ATP binding energy to stabilize the transition state for the reaction. Whereas the net effect of the mobile loop in the E.Tyr.ATP complex results from several conflicting side chain interactions that tend to offset each other, conflicting interactions in the E.[Tyr-ATP]not equal to transition state complex have been minimized and stabilizing pairwise interactions between the K230, K233, and T234 side chains are optimized. The tight coupling between the side chains of K230, K233, and T234 suggests that the mobile loop adopts a highly constrained conformation during formation of the transition state complex. These results quantitatively demonstrate the importance of side chain interactions in enzyme catalysis and illustrate the use of binding energy to stabilize the transition state of a reaction and the presence of unfavorable interactions to destabilize the ground state.