Identifying the molecular pathways that are required for regeneration remains one of the great challenges of regenerative medicine. Although genetic mutations have been useful for identifying some molecular pathways, small molecule probes of regenerative pathways might offer some advantages, including the ability to disrupt pathway function with precise temporal control. However, a vertebrate regeneration model amenable to rapid throughput small molecule screening is not currently available. We report here the development of a zebrafish early life stage fin regeneration model and its use in screening for small molecules that modulate tissue regeneration. By screening 2000 biologically active small molecules, we identified 17 that specifically inhibited regeneration. These compounds include a cluster of glucocorticoids, and we demonstrate that transient activation of the glucocorticoid receptor is sufficient to block regeneration, but only if activation occurs during wound healing/blastema formation. In addition, knockdown of the glucocorticoid receptor restores regenerative capability to nonregenerative, glucocorticoid-exposed zebrafish. To test whether the classical anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids is responsible for blocking regeneration, we prevented acute inflammation following amputation by antisense repression of the Pu.1 gene. Although loss of Pu.1 prevents the inflammatory response, regeneration is not affected. Collectively, these results indicate that signaling from exogenous glucocorticoids impairs blastema formation and limits regenerative capacity through an acute inflammation-independent mechanism. These studies also demonstrate the feasibility of exploiting chemical genetics to define the pathways that govern vertebrate regeneration.

Fish are known to have two distinct classes of aryl hydrocarbon receptors, and their roles in mediating xenobiotic toxicity remain unclear. In this study, we have identified and characterized a cDNA tentatively named zebrafish AHR1 (zfAHR1). Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence reveals that the protein is distinct from zfAHR2 and is more closely related to the mammalian aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). zfAHR1 and zfAHR2 share 40% amino acid identity overall and 58% in the N-terminal half. The zfAHR1 gene maps to linkage group 16 in a region that shares conserved synteny with human chromosome 7 containing the human AHR, suggesting that the zfAHR1 is the ortholog of the human AHR. zfAHR2 maps to a separate linkage group (LG22). Both zfAHR mRNAs are expressed in early development, but they are differentially expressed in adult tissues. zfAHR2 can dimerize with zfARNT2b and binds with specificity to dioxin-responsive elements (DREs). Under identical conditions, zfAHR1/zfARNT2b/DRE complexes are formed; however, the interactions are considerably weaker. In COS-7 cells expressing zfARNT2b and zfAHR2, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure leads to a significant induction of dioxin-responsive reporter genes. In identical experiments, TCDD exposure fails to induce the reporter gene in zfAHR1-expressing cells. Ligand-binding experiments suggested that the differential zfAHR activities are attributable to differences in TCDD binding because only zfAHR2 exhibits high-affinity binding to [ 3 H]TCDD or ␤-naphthoflavone. Finally, using chimeric zfAHR1/zfAHR2 constructs, the lack of TCDDmediated transcriptional activity was localized to the ligandbinding and C-terminal domains of zfAHR1.The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix PAS family of proteins. Members of this family include the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocators (ARNT, ARNT2, and ARNT3), hypoxia-inducible factor 1␣, Drosophila melanogaster single-minded, D. melanogaster period, Clock, and others. These proteins are involved in mediating responses to environmental contaminants, low oxygen tension and glucose, circadian rhythm, and various other cues (for review, see Gu et al., 2000). The basic components of the AHR signal transduction pathway are well understood (for review, see Schmidt and Bradfield, 1996). The cytosolic AHR is complexed with at least three chaperone proteins, two molecules of HSP90 and the aryl hydrocarbon interacting protein (AIP, also known as ARA9 or XAP2), enabling proper conformation for ligand binding. Once bound by ligands such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the cytosolic AHR translocates to the nucleus, dissociates from the chaperone proteins, and dimerizes with ARNT. This heterodimeric AHR/ARNT complex associates with specific DNA sequences termed dioxin-response elements (DRE, alternatively known as xenobiotic response el-

To better understand the role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling pathway in causing tissue-specific signs of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) toxicity in zebrafish, the temporal and spatial expression of the zebrafish aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 (zfAHR2), aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (zfARNT2), and an AHR regulated gene, cytochrome P4501A (zfCYP1A), were assessed in larvae exposed to vehicle or TCDD (1.55 nM) from 3-4 h postfertilization (hpf). Coexpression of a transcriptionally active AHR pathway was apparent by the expression of zfCYP1A mRNA and protein in certain larval tissues. zfCYP1A protein was first detected in the skin and vasculature of TCDD-exposed larvae at 36 hpf. Vascular-specific zfCYP1A protein expression continued from 36 to120 hpf at which time it was also detected in the heart, kidney, and liver. zfCYP1A mRNA was observed in TCDD treated larvae as early as 24 hpf in the developing vascular system. Vascular specific zfCYP1A mRNA expression in the head, trunk, and tail by 36 hpf in TCDD-exposed larvae, confirmed immunohistochemical localization. The expression of zfAHR2 and zfARNT2 mRNAs was generally similar in control and TCDD-exposed larvae. Coexpression of zfAHR2, zfARNT2, and zfCYP1A mRNAs was evident in TCDD-exposed larvae by 36 hpf and in the vasculature, heart, and trunk kidney by 48 hpf, well before the first signs of overt developmental toxicity are observed. In addition to their function in response to AHR agonists, zfAHR2 and zfARNT2 may be involved in development and function of the nervous system. zfAHR2 and zfARNT2 were detected in the brain, spinal cord, and sensory organs. However, TCDD-induced zfCYP1A expression was not detected in these tissues. Taken together, these results are consistent with the notion that the cardiovascular system is a primary target of TCDD developmental toxicity in zebrafish.