Molecular mechanics Poisson−Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) are arguably very popular methods for binding free energy prediction since they are more accurate than most scoring functions of molecular docking and less computationally demanding than alchemical free energy methods. MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA have been widely used in biomolecular studies such as protein folding, protein−ligand binding, protein−protein interaction, etc. In this review, methods to adjust the polar solvation energy and to improve the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA calculations are reviewed and discussed. The latest applications of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA in drug design are also presented. This review intends to provide readers with guidance for practically applying MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA in drug design and related research fields. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 9478 2. Methodology 9480 3. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA 9484 4. The Polar Solvation Energy and Entropy Terms in MM/PB(GB)SA Calculations 9485 4.1. The Polar Solvation Energy Term in MM/ PBSA 9485 4.2. The Polar Energy Solvation Term in MM/ GBSA 9486 4.3. Theory, Implementation, and Limitations of the Variable Dielectric Model in MM/GBSA 9487 4.4. Comparison between PB and GB 9488 4.5. Efficient Entropy Calculation Methods To Estimate the Entropy Change upon Ligand Binding 9488 5.

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) play an important role in the different functions of cells, but accurate prediction of the three-dimensional structures for PPIs is still a notoriously difficult task. In this study, HawkDock, a free and open accessed web server, was developed to predict and analyze the structures of PPIs. In the HawkDock server, the ATTRACT docking algorithm, the HawkRank scoring function developed in our group and the MM/GBSA free energy decomposition analysis were seamlessly integrated into a multi-functional platform. The structures of PPIs were predicted by combining the ATTRACT docking and the HawkRank re-scoring, and the key residues for PPIs were highlighted by the MM/GBSA free energy decomposition. The molecular visualization was supported by 3Dmol.js. For the structural modeling of PPIs, HawkDock could achieve a better performance than ZDOCK 3.0.2 in the benchmark testing. For the prediction of key residues, the important residues that play an essential role in PPIs could be identified in the top 10 residues for ∼81.4% predicted models and ∼95.4% crystal structures in the benchmark dataset. To sum up, the HawkDock server is a powerful tool to predict the binding structures and identify the key residues of PPIs. The HawkDock server is accessible free of charge at http://cadd.zju.edu.cn/hawkdock/.

Accurate quantification of protein–ligand interactions remains a key challenge to structure-based drug design. However, traditional machine learning (ML)-based methods based on handcrafted descriptors, one-dimensional protein sequences, and/or two-dimensional graph representations limit their capability to learn the generalized molecular interactions in 3D space. Here, we proposed a novel deep graph representation learning framework named InteractionGraphNet (IGN) to learn the protein–ligand interactions from the 3D structures of protein–ligand complexes. In IGN, two independent graph convolution modules were stacked to sequentially learn the intramolecular and intermolecular interactions, and the learned intermolecular interactions can be efficiently used for subsequent tasks. Extensive binding affinity prediction, large-scale structure-based virtual screening, and pose prediction experiments demonstrated that IGN achieved better or competitive performance against other state-of-the-art ML-based baselines and docking programs. More importantly, such state-of-the-art performance was proven from the successful learning of the key features in protein–ligand interactions instead of just memorizing certain biased patterns from data.

Enhanced sampling has been extensively used to capture the conformational transitions in protein folding, but it attracts much less attention in the studies of protein–protein recognition.