2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp04096j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein–protein Interactions

Abstract: Enhanced sampling has been extensively used to capture the conformational transitions in protein folding, but it attracts much less attention in the studies of protein–protein recognition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be 1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 in different MM-PBSA calculations. [71][72][73][74] Insulin is an essential protein in treating the disease. Understanding the binding mechanism of insulin dimer will be useful to design drug.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be 1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 in different MM-PBSA calculations. [71][72][73][74] Insulin is an essential protein in treating the disease. Understanding the binding mechanism of insulin dimer will be useful to design drug.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the molecular mechanical force field (MMFF)-based scoring functions, are physical and more accurate, but much less efficient. With the ever increasing computer power, MMFF-based free energy calculation methods, such as the endpoint MM-PB/GBSA (molecular mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann/ Generalized Born Surface Area) methods 2,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and the alchemical thermodynamic integration (TI) and free energy perturbation (FEP) methods, 22,23 have been extensively applied in structure-based drug discovery projects. Recently we've developed a hierarchical virtual screening (HVS)to balance the efficiency and accuracy and improve the success rate of rational drug design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different trajectories like root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) and number of hydrogen bonds ware determined through MD simulations. (Duan et al, 2019;Skjevik et al, 2015;Srivastava & Sastry, 2012;Wang et al, 2019;Xu, Sun, Li, Wang, & Hou, 2013) The RMSD curve is obtained from correlating time with the deviations to understand the stability of the complexes in comparison of the protease alone and can be determined based on the following equation. (Alexandrescu, Snyder, & Abildgaard, 2001;Bruschweiler, 2003) Where N is the number of atoms, X m , Y m , Z m are the Cartesian coordinates of the initial structure and X l , Y l , Z l are the Cartesian coordinates of trajectory at frame t.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%