AbstractOver the past decade, studies of admixed populations have increasingly gained interest in both medical and population genetics. These studies have so far shed light on the patterns of genetic variation throughout modern human evolution and have improved our understanding of the demographics and adaptive processes of human populations. To date, there exist about 20 methods or tools to deconvolve local ancestry. These methods have merits and drawbacks in estimating local ancestry in multiway admixed populations. In this article, we survey existing ancestry deconvolution methods, with special emphasis on multiway admixture, and compare these methods based on simulation results reported by different studies, computational approaches used, including mathematical and statistical models, and biological challenges related to each method. This should orient users on the choice of an appropriate method or tool for given population admixture characteristics and update researchers on current advances, challenges and opportunities behind existing ancestry deconvolution methods.
Rapid advances in sequencing and genotyping technologies have significantly contributed to shaping the area of medical and population genetics. Several thousand genomes are completed with millions of variants identified in the human deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences. These genomic variations highly influence changes in phenotypic manifestations and physiological functions of different individuals or population groups. Of particular importance are variations introduced by admixture event, contributing significantly to a remarkable phenotypic variability with medical and/or evolutionary implications. In this case, knowledge of local ancestry estimates and date of admixture is of utmost importance for a better understanding of genomic variation patterns throughout modern human evolution and adaptive processes. In this chapter, we survey existing local ancestry deconvolution and dating admixture event models to identify possible gaps that still need to be filled and orient future trends in designing more effective models, which account for current challenges and produce more accurate and biological relevant estimates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.