The number and significance of airway eosinophils in stable COPD is controversial. Aims of this study were to evaluate airway inflammation in patients with stable COPD compared with other groups, and to examine the correlations between inflammatory markers and functional indices of airway obstruction. Cellular analysis and evaluation of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in induced sputum were made in 46 subjects (10 patients with clinically stable COPD, 15 patients with asthma, 11 asymptomatic smokers, and 10 healthy control subjects). As expected, eosinophils were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in patients with asthma (22.2%) than in other groups (COPD, 0.7%; smokers, 0.2%; control subjects, 0.2%), and neutrophils were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in patients with COPD (77.5%) than in the other groups (asthma, 26.7%; smokers, 33.1%; control subjects, 35.9%). However, eosinophils were also increased in patients with COPD, as compared with healthy controls (p < 0.05). Sputum ECP levels were significantly and similarly higher in both asthma and COPD groups than in the other two groups (p < 0.01). In patients with COPD and asymptomatic smokers, considered as a whole, good correlations were found between eosinophils and ECP, on the one hand, and between FEV(1) and the FEV(1)/FVC ratio, on the other. Our data suggest that eosinophils may be involved in the airway inflammation of COPD.
Previous studies have suggested that the endogenous release of inhibitory prostanoids limits the bronchoconstrictor response to repeated exercise. The aim of our study was to determine whether inhaled prostaglandin (PG)E2 attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or methacholine airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Eight subjects with mild stable asthma and exercise bronchoconstriction were studied on 4 separate days, 48 h apart. Subjects inhaled PGE2 or placebo in a randomized, crossover, double-blind fashion, 30 min prior to an exercise challenge or a methacholine challenge. PGE2 inhalation significantly attenuated exercise bronchoconstriction. The mean maximal %fall in FEV1 after exercise was 26% (SEM 3.7%) after placebo, and was 9.7% (SEM 2.7%) after PGE2 (p < 0.001). PGE2 also significantly reduced the duration of exercise bronchoconstriction (p = 0.034). However, PGE2 did not significantly attenuate methacholine airway responsiveness. The geometric mean methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was 0.77 (%SEM 1.48) after placebo day, and 1.41 (%SEM 2.20) after PGE2 (p = 0.30). These results demonstrate that inhaled PGE2 markedly attenuates exercise bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects and suggest that this effect is not occurring through functional antagonism of airway smooth muscle.
No abstract
Abstract-Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) blunt postural skin vasoconstriction, an autoregulatory mechanism that minimizes gravitational increases in capillary pressure and avoids fluid extravasation when standing. To evaluate the dose-response relation between this pharmacological interference and dependent edema, a frequent side effect of CCBs during antihypertensive treatment, skin blood flow (laser Doppler flowmetry) at the dorsum of the foot, both supine and with the limb passively placed 50 cm below the heart level, and leg weight (Archimedes principle) were measured at baseline, during increasing doses of the dihydropyridine amlodipine (5 and 10 mg UID each for 2 weeks), and after drug withdrawal in 10 hypertensive men. Because angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may attenuate ankle swelling by CCBs, those parameters were evaluated according to a similar design during amlodipine (10 mg UID) and enalapril (20 mg UID) combined (nϭ10). As a control, the effect of enalapril monotherapy (10 and 20 mg UID for 2 weeks each) was evaluated in a third series of patients (nϭ8). Amlodipine (5 mg UID) increased leg weight without modifying postural vasoconstriction (the percent skin blood flow decrease from horizontal to dependent position), which indicates that extravascular fluid shift was independent of postural skin vasoconstriction. At 10 mg UID, however, amlodipine blunted postural vasoconstriction and increased leg weight further, which suggests that skin blood flow autoregulation Key Words: calcium antagonists Ⅲ angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Ⅲ blood flow Ⅲ vasoconstriction Ⅲ hypertension, essential P recapillary resistance in the skin of the foot rises on standing, thereby limiting the increase in capillary pressure resulting from gravitational increases in transmural pressure. 1,2 This autoregulatory vasoconstrictor mechanism is triggered by limb venous congestion and operates both through a locally evoked sympathetic axoaxonic reflex 1,2 and local myogenic factors, 3 with some minor participation of central mechanisms. 2 The postural vasoconstrictor response protects subcutaneous tissue from fluid extravasation during dependency and eventually dependent edema 1 ; its derangement, as in patients with peripheral vascular disease 4 and diabetes, 5 sets the stage for subcutaneous edema formation. 6 We have recently shown impaired postural skin blood flow control in patients with essential hypertension who were treated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs). 7 This pharmacological effect may contribute to ankle and/or pretibial edema in the absence of fluid retention, 8 a frequent, bothersome, and still not completely understood collateral effect of calcium antagonist drugs. 9 To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the relation between changes in postural skin vasomotion and objective measures of ankle swelling during treatment with graded doses of amlodipine, a dihydropyridine CCB. 10 On the basis of previous reports of reduced ankle swelling during association therapy with angiotensin-converting enz...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.