No abstract

No abstract

Aim: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy found in males worldwide. Although it is mostly indolent, PCa still poses a serious threat to long-term health. Materials & methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas data were randomly divided into training and validation groups. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression on DNA methylation data in the training group was conducted to build the model, which was validated in the validation group. Weighted correlation network analysis was conducted on RNA-seq data to identify the therapy target. Functional validation (western blot, quantitative real-time PCR, cell transfection, Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, colony formation assay, wound healing assay and transwell invasion assay) for the target was conducted. Results: The model is an independent predictor of prognosis. The knockdown of FOXD1 inhibits cell proliferation, migration and invasion of PCa. Conclusion: The risk of patients could be evaluated by the model, which revealed that FOXD1 might promote poor prognosis.

No abstract

No abstract

Departmental sources Background: We sought to investigate the expression of KPNA2 in bladder cancer (BC) and its relationship with prognosis, and to analyze the potential mechanism of KPNA2 in promoting BC progression. Material/Methods: The RNA-seq data on BC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were imported into R statistical software for differential analysis. The clinical data for patients with BC were screened and analyzed with R software. The survival curve was drawn with the Kaplan-Meier Plotter. The expression of KPNA2 in 4 human BC cell lines and a human bladder epithelial cell line was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting (WB). The proliferation of BC cells was detected with Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8), detection of apoptosis, and flow cytometry, and the migration and invasion of BC cells were detected through Transwell assays. WB was used to detect proteins involved in the P53 pathway. Results: The expression of KPNA2 was higher in BC. The difference in KPNA2 expression was associated with many clinicopathological factors, and high expression of KPNA2 was associated with shorter survival time. After KPNA2 knockout, the proliferation, migration, and invasion ability decreased significantly, the cell cycle was clearly arrested in the G0/G1 phase, and the number of apoptotic cells increased. Moreover, CyclinD1, BCL2, and pro-caspase3 decreased significantly, whereas P53, P21, BAX, and cleaved-caspase3 increased significantly. The results in the overexpression group were the opposite of results in the knockdown group. Conclusions: KPNA2 is an oncogenic factor that facilitates BC tumorigenicity through the P53 pathway.

Pancreatic cancer (PanC) is an intractable malignancy with a high mortality. Metabolic processes contribute to cancer progression and therapeutic responses, and histopathological subtypes are insufficient for determining prognosis and treatment strategies. In this study, PanC subtypes based on metabolism-related genes were identified and further utilized to construct a prognostic model. Using a cohort of 171 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, transcriptome data, simple nucleotide variants (SNV), and clinical information were analyzed. We divided patients with PanC into metabolic gene-enriched and metabolic gene-desert subtypes. The metabolic gene-enriched subgroup is a high-risk subtype with worse outcomes and a higher frequency of SNVs, especially in KRAS. After further characterizing the subtypes, we constructed a risk score algorithm involving multiple genes (i.e., NEU2, GMPS, PRIM2, PNPT1, LDHA, INPP4B, DPYD, PYGL, CA12, DHRS9, SULT1E1, ENPP2, PDE1C, TPH1, CHST12, POLR3GL, DNMT3A, and PGS1). We verified the reproducibility and reliability of the risk score using three validation cohorts (i.e., independent datasets from TCGA, Gene Expression Omnibus, and Ensemble databases). Finally, drug prediction was completed using a ridge regression model, yielding nine candidate drugs for high-risk patients. These findings support the classification of PanC into two metabolic subtypes and further suggest that the metabolic gene-enriched subgroup is associated with worse outcomes. The newly established risk model for prognosis and therapeutic responses may improve outcomes in patients with PanC.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of renal cancer. Currently, we lack effective risk models for the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Given the significant role of cancer immunity in ccRCC, we aimed to establish a novel united risk model including clinical stage and immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) to assess the prognosis. The gene expression profile and clinical data of ccRCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Arrayexpress were divided into training cohort (n = 381), validation cohort 1 (n = 156), and validation cohort 2 (n = 101). Through univariate Cox regression analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator analysis, 11 IRGPs were obtained. After further analysis, it was found that clinical stage could be an independent prognostic factor; hence, we used it to construct a united prognostic model with 11 IRGPs. Based on this model, patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, a significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) among all three cohorts (p < 0.001). The calibration curve revealed that the signature model is in high accordance with the observed values of each data cohort. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year receiver operating characteristic curves of each data cohort showed better performance than only IRGP signatures. The results of immune infiltration analysis revealed significantly (p < 0.05) higher abundance of macrophages M0, T follicular helper cells, and other tumor infiltrating cells. In summary, we successfully established a united prognostic risk model, which can effectively assess the OS of ccRCC patients.