Recent years have witnessed a renewed interest in development of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. Optimizing CBM production is of interest to many operators. Drilling horizontal and multilateral wells is gaining popularity in many different coalbed reservoirs, with varying results. This study concentrates on variations of horizontaland multilateral-well configurations and their potential benefits. In this study, horizontal and several multilateral drilling patterns for CBM reservoirs are studied. The reservoir parameters that have been studied include gas content, permeability, and desorption characteristics. Net present value (NPV) has been used as the yard stick for comparing different drilling configurations. Configurations that have been investigated are single-, dual-, tri-, and quad-lateral wells along with fishbone (also known as pinnate) wells. In these configurations, the total length of horizontal wells and the spacing between laterals (SBL) have been studied. It was determined that in the cases that have been studied in this paper (all other circumstances being equal), quadlateral wells are the optimum well configuration. Readers are encouraged to see Shi and Durucan (2005) and Gu and Chalaturnyk (2005) for details on this topic. Horizontal Wells. Methane can be drained through smalldiameter horizontal holes. The main advantages of horizontal wells are that the well direction, shape, and position can be controlled.
Closed-loop reservoir management requires representative models that can be updated quickly. Such kind of models that can be used for characterization of reservoir connectivity would greatly contribute to decisions in waterflooding operations. In heterogeneous reservoirs that are characterized with thief-zones/ fractures or flow-barriers, that may enhance or prevent connectivity, it becomes challenging to construct geological models with both reasonable accuracy and computational efficiency. In this study, practical and computationally-efficient methods are presented to first accurately characterize the connectivity between producer and injector wells, and then to forecast the waterflood performance. Two classes of modeling approaches are evaluated in terms of their applicability to characterize the connectivity: 1) Data-driven modeling -artificial neural networks (ANN), in which there is not any presumed functional relationship and connectivity is derived from the weights on connection links of neural networks; 2) Reduced-physics modeling -capacitance-resistance models (CRM), in which physics are incorporated with certain assumptions and connectivity is derived from the fractional flow parameter in the formulation. In both approaches; a producer-based control volume is considered to focus on producers and their connectivity to different injectors, and both models are trained with injection/production histories. Connectivity values derived from these methods are fed into a short-term, pattern-based forecasting methodology, which quantified ultimate recoveries at the desired oil-cut values. Two synthetic reservoir models are used to test the applicability of aforementioned methods; which are characterized with high-permeability streaks and flow-barriers. These key features that affect connectivity are identified by both modeling approaches with reasonable accuracies, but with varying interpretations of fluid movement in the reservoir. Pattern-based forecasting methodology resulted in ultimate recovery predictions very close to the numerical-model based results, with errors within 3%. The workflow presented is quick and reliable to be implemented in closed-loop reservoir management protocols, which requires models that can be updated easily with recent data, and can be used in decision making processes with confidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.