The purpose of this study was the evaluation of a computer algorithm for the automated detection of endocardial and epicardial boundaries of the left ventricle in time series of short-axis magnetic resonance images based on an Active Appearance Motion Model (AAMM). In 20 short-axis MR examinations, manual contours were defined in multiple temporal frames (from end-diastole to end-systole) in multiple slices from base to apex. Using a leave-one-out procedure, the image data and contours were used to build 20 different AAMMs giving a statistical description of the ventricular shape, gray value appearance, and cardiac motion patterns in the training set. Automated contour detection was performed by iteratively deforming the AAMM within statistically allowed limits until an optimal match was found between the deformed AAMM and the underlying image data of the left-out subject. Global ventricular function results derived from automatically detected contours were compared with results obtained from manually traced boundaries. The AAMM contour detection method was successful in 17 of 20 studies. The three failures were excluded from further statistical analysis. Automated contour detection resulted in small, but statistically nonsignificant, underestimations of ventricular volumes and mass: differences for end-diastolic volume were 0.3%+/-12.0%, for end-systolic volume 2.0%+/-23.4% and for left ventricular myocardial mass 0.73%+/-14.9% (mean+/-SD). An excellent agreement was observed in the ejection fraction: difference of 0.1%+/-6.7%. In conclusion, the presented fully automated contour detection method provides assessment of quantitative global function that is comparable to manual analysis.
To reduce the frequency of a spiral CT artifact that simulates aortic dissection, two series of segmented images can be reconstructed with a change of image position along the z axis of the aorta and use of a 180 degrees linear-interpolation algorithm.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) dual inversion-recovery (DIR) segmented k-space gradient-echo (turbo field echo [TFE]) imaging sequence at 3T for the quantification of aortic vessel wall dimensions. The effect of respiratory motion suppression on image quality was tested. Furthermore, the reproducibility of the aortic vessel wall measurements was investigated. Seven healthy subjects underwent 3D DIR TFE imaging of the aortic vessel wall with and without respiratory navigator. Subsequently, this sequence with respiratory navigator was performed twice in 10 healthy subjects to test its reproducibility. The signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), vessel wall sharpness, and vessel wall volume (VWV) were assessed. Data were compared using the paired t-test, and the reproducibility of VWV measurements was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). SNR, CNR, and vessel wall sharpness were superior in scans performed with respiratory navigator compared to scans performed without. The ICCs concerning intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan reproducibility were excellent (
Automatic segmentation of the left ventricular (LV) myocardial borders in cardiovascular MR (CMR) images allows a significant speed-up of the procedure of quantifying LV function, and improves its reproducibility. The automated boundary delineation is usually based on a set of parameters that define the algorithms. Since the automatic segmentation algorithms are usually sensitive to the image quality and frequently depend heavily on the acquisition protocol, optimizing the parameters of the algorithm for such different protocols may be necessary to obtain optimal results. In other words, using a default set of parameters may be far from optimal for different scanners or protocols. For the MASS-software, for example, this means that a total of 14 parameters need to be optimized. This optimization is a difficult and labor-intensive process. To be able to more consistently and rapidly tune the parameters, an automated optimization system would be extremely desirable. In this paper we propose such an approach, which is based on genetic algorithms (GAs). The GA is an unsupervised iterative tool that generates new sets of parameters and converges toward an optimal set. We implemented and compared two different types of the genetic algorithms: a simple GA (SGA) and a steady state GA (2SGA). The difference between these two algorithms lies in the characteristics of the generated populations: "nonoverlapping populations" and "overlapping populations," respectively "nonoverlapping" population means that the two populations are disjoint, and "overlapping" means that the best parameters found in the previous generation are included in the present population. The performance of both algorithms was evaluated on twenty routinely obtained short-axis examinations (eleven examinations acquired with a steady-state free precession pulse sequence, and nine examinations with a gradient echo pulse sequence). The optimal parameters obtained with the GAs were used for the LV myocardial border delineation. Finally, the automatically outlined contours were compared to the gold standard--manually drawn contours by experts. The result of the comparison was expressed as a degree of similarity after a processing time of less than 72 h to a 59.5% of degree of similarity for SGA and a 66.7% of degree of similarity for 2SGA. In conclusion, genetic algorithms are very suitable to automatically tune the parameters of a border detection algorithm. Based on our data, the 2SGA was more suitable than the SGA method. This approach can be generalized to other optimization problems in medical image processing.
A model defined on a sufficient number of images with the correct distribution of image characteristics achieves good matches in clinical routine. It is essential to define different AAM models for different vendors of MRI systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.