Anal fissure management has rapidly progressed in the last 15 years as our understanding of fissure pathophysiology has developed. All methods of treatment aim to reduce the anal sphincter spasm associated with chronic anal fissures. Surgical techniques have been used for over 100 years with success. Lateral internal sphincterotomy remains the surgical treatment of choice for many practitioners. Postoperative impairment of continence remains controversial. Recently, less invasive methods of treatment have been explored. Topical nitrates, calcium channel blockers and botulinum toxin are established treatments. These and other non-surgical treatments are described in this review. Various guidelines and treatment algorithms for anal fissure are also discussed.
INTRODUCTIONIn 2010 a care bundle was introduced by the Department of Health (DH) to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in England. To date, use of the care bundle has not been evaluated despite incorporating interventions with resource implications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the DH SSI care bundle in open colorectal surgery. METHODS A prospective cohort design was used at two teaching hospitals in England. The baseline group consisted of 127 consecutive patients having colorectal surgery during a 6-month period while the intervention group comprised 166 patients in the subsequent 6 months. SSI and care bundle compliance data were collected using dedicated surveillance staff. RESULTS Just under a quarter (24%) of the patients in the baseline group developed a SSI compared with just over a quarter (28%) in the care bundle group (p>0.05). However, compliance rates with individual interventions, both before and after the implementation of the bundle, were similar. Interestingly, in only 19% of cases was there compliance with the total care bundle. The single intervention that showed an associated reduction in SSI was preoperative warming (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS The DH care bundle did not reduce SSIs after open colorectal surgery. Despite this, it is not possible to state that the bundle is ineffective as compliance rates before and after bundle implementation were similar. All studies evaluating the effectiveness of care bundles must include data for compliance with interventions both before and after implementation of the care bundle; poor compliance may be one of the reasons for the lower than expected reduction of SSIs.
Background Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) for primary hyperparathyroidism is dependent upon accurate prediction of single-gland disease on the basis of preoperative imaging and biochemistry. The aims of this study were to validate currently available predictive models of single-gland disease in two UK cohorts and to determine if these models can facilitate MIP. Methods This is a retrospectively cohort study of 624 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism in two centres between July 2008 and December 2013. Two recognised models: CaPTHUS (preoperative calcium, parathyroid hormone, ultrasound, sestamibi, concordance imaging) and Wisconsin Index (preoperative calcium, parathyroid hormone) were validated for their ability to predict single-gland disease. Results The rates of single- and multi-gland disease were 491 (79.6%) and 126 (20.2%), respectively. Cure rates in centres 1 and 2 were 93.2% and 93.8%, respectively (P = 0.789). The positive predictive value (PPV) of CaPTHUS score . 3 in predicting single-gland disease was 84.6%, compared with 100% in the original report. CaPTHUS . 4 and 5 had a PPV of 85.1 and 87.1, respectively. There were no differences in Wisconsin Index (WIN) between patients with single- and multi-gland (P = 0.573). A WIN greater than 1600 and weight of excised gland greater than 1 g had a positive predictive value of 86.7% for single-gland disease. Conclusions The use of CaPTHUS and WIN indices without intraoperative adjuncts (such as IOPTH) had the potential to result in failure to cure in up to 15% (CaPTHUS) and 13% (WIN) of patients treated by MIP targeting a single enlarged gland.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.