No abstract

Background: Over the past five years, in most hospitals in England and Wales, incident reporting has become well established but it remains unclear how well reports match clinical adverse events. International epidemiological studies of adverse events are based on retrospective, multi-hospital case record review. In this paper the authors describe the use of incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review for the recognition of clinical risks associated with hospital inpatient care. Methodology: Data on adverse events were collected prospectively on 288 patients discharged from adult acute medical and surgical units in an NHS district general hospital using incident reports, active surveillance of prescription charts by pharmacists and record review at time of discharge. Results: Record review detected 26 adverse events (AEs) and 40 potential adverse events (PAEs) occurring during the index admission. In contrast, in the same patient group, incident reporting detected 11 PAEs and no AEs. Pharmacy surveillance found 10 medication errors all of which were PAEs. There was little overlap in the nature of events detected by the three methods. Conclusion: The findings suggest that incident reporting does not provide an adequate assessment of clinical adverse events and that this method needs to be supplemented with other more systematic forms of data collection. Structured record review, carried out by clinicians, provides an important component of an integrated approach to identifying risk in the context of developing a safety and quality improvement programme.

The CDKN2A locus is frequently inactivated in urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC), yet how this alteration contributes to bladder tumorigenesis is not known. Although most UCC express telomerase, inactivation of the p16/Rb pathway is generally required for in vitro immortalisation. This and the involvement of p16 in senescence of normal human urothelial cells (NHUC) suggest that CDKN2A deletion may aid bypass of senescence and allow immortalisation. CDKN2A encodes p16 and p14 ARF and therefore inactivation of this locus can disrupt both the Rb and p53 tumour suppressor pathways. Retrovirusmediated transduction was used to specifically modulate the p16/Rb and/or p53 tumour suppressor pathways in NHUC and to express human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Expression of hTERT bypassed Rb and p53 pathway-dependent barriers to proliferation and immortalised NHUC. TERT-NHUC had normal karyotypes, were non-tumorigenic and unexpectedly retained CDKN2A. Thus, the phenotypic significance of inactivation of CDKN2A in UCC may not be solely related to bypass of senescence. Phenotypic assays in human urothelial cells have relied on cell strains derived from invasive tumours or NHUC immortalised by expression of SV40-large T. The production of genetically normal but immortal NHUC lines now provides a valuable platform for experiments to examine the timing and combination of events necessary for UCC tumorigenesis.

Background Early provision of palliative care, at least 3–4 months before death, can improve patient quality of life and reduce burdensome treatments and financial costs. However, there is wide variation in the duration of palliative care received before death reported across the research literature. This study aims to determine the duration of time from initiation of palliative care to death for adults receiving palliative care across the international literature. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018094718). Six databases were searched for articles published between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library, as well undertaking citation list searches. Following PRISMA guidelines, articles were screened using inclusion (any study design reporting duration from initiation to death in adults palliative care services) and exclusion (paediatric/non-English language studies, trials influencing the timing of palliative care) criteria. Quality appraisal was completed using Hawker’s criteria and the main outcome was the duration of palliative care (median/mean days from initiation to death). Results One hundred sixty-nine studies from 23 countries were included, involving 11,996,479 patients. Prior to death, the median duration from initiation of palliative care to death was 18.9 days (IQR 0.1), weighted by the number of participants. Significant differences between duration were found by disease type (15 days for cancer vs 6 days for non-cancer conditions), service type (19 days for specialist palliative care unit, 20 days for community/home care, and 6 days for general hospital ward) and development index of countries (18.91 days for very high development vs 34 days for all other levels of development). Forty-three per cent of studies were rated as ‘good’ quality. Limitations include a preponderance of data from high-income countries, with unclear implications for low- and middle-income countries. Conclusions Duration of palliative care is much shorter than the 3–4 months of input by a multidisciplinary team necessary in order for the full benefits of palliative care to be realised. Furthermore, the findings highlight inequity in access across patient, service and country characteristics. We welcome more consistent terminology and methodology in the assessment of duration of palliative care from all countries, alongside increased reporting from less-developed settings, to inform benchmarking, service evaluation and quality improvement.

The expression of hTERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, immortalizes normal human urothelial cells (NHUC). Expression of a modified hTERT, without the ability to act in telomere maintenance, did not immortalize NHUC, confirming that effects at telomeres are required for urothelial immortalization. Previous studies indicate that inhibition of telomerase has an immediate effect on urothelial carcinoma (UC) cell line viability, before sufficient divisions to account for telomere attrition, implicating non -telomere effects of telomerase in UC. We analyzed the effects of telomerase on gene expression in isogenic mortal and hTERT-transduced NHUC. hTERT expression led to consistent alterations in the expression of genes predicted to be of phenotypic significance in tumorigenesis. A subset of expression changes were detected soon after transduction with hTERT and persisted with continued culture. These genes (NME5, PSCA, TSPYL5, LY75, IGFBP2, IGF2, CEACAM6, XG, NOX5, KAL1, and HPGD) include eight previously identified as polycomb group targets. TERT-NHUC showed overexpression of the polycomb repressor complex (PRC1 and PRC4) components, BMI1 and SIRT1, and down-regulation of multiple PRC targets and genes associated with differentiation. TERT-NHUC at 100 population doublings, but not soon after transduction, showed increased saturation density and an attenuated differentiation response, indicating that these are not acute effects of telomerase expression. Some of the changes in gene expression identified may contribute to tumorigenesis. Expression of NME5 and NDN was down-regulated in UC cell lines and tumors. Our data supports the concept of both telomere-based and non -telomere effects of telomerase and provides further rationale for the use of telomerase inhibitors in UC.

Objective To assess the utility of data already existing within hospitals for monitoring patient safety Setting An acute hospital in Southern EnglandDesign Mapping of data sources proposed by staff as potentially able to identify patient safety issues followed by an in depth analysis of the content of seven key Conclusion Despite issues related to the quality of coding, depth of information available and accessibility, triangulating information from more than one source can identify a broader range of incidents and provide additional information related to professional groups involved, types of patients affected and important contributory factors. Such an approach can provide a focus for further work and ultimately contributes to the identification of appropriate interventions that improve patient safety.5

Purpose: There are significant differences in reported frequencies, modes of inactivation, and clinical significance of CDKN2A in urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC). We aimed to address these issues by investigating all possible modes of inactivation and clinicopathologic variables in a single tumor panel. Experimental Design: Fifty microdissected UCCs were examined. CDKN2A gene dosage (quantitative real-time PCR), allelic status (microsatellite analysis), hypermethylation (methylationspecific PCR), mutation status (denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and sequencing), protein expression (immunohistochemistry), and clinicopathologic variables (stage, grade, and disease recurrence during follow-up) were assessed. Results: Exon 2 was underrepresented in 20 of 46 (43%) and exon1h in 21of 46 (46%) of cases. Underrepresentation of exon 2 was accompanied by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 9p in 6 of 18 (30%) and of exon 1h in 11of 19 assessable cases (58%). Overall, LOH of 9p was identified in 15/41 (37%). Homozygous deletion of exons 2 and 1h was detected in 16 of 46 (35%) and 10 of 46 tumors (22%), respectively. Co-deletion was most common, but exon 2^specific homozygous deletion was also detected. In tumors without homozygous deletion, p16 promoter hypermethylation was detected in 1of 18 (6%). Hypermethylation of the p14 ARF promoter or mutations in CDKN2A were not observed. Homozygous deletion of exon 2 or LOH on 9p were associated with invasion. Homozygous deletion of exon 2 or exon1h was associated with recurrent disease. Conclusions: These results confirm CDKN2A as a clinically relevant target for inactivation in UCC and show that the true frequency of alteration is only revealed by comprehensive analysis. Our results suggest that CDKN2A may be haploinsufficient in human cancer.

Background: Pain of a moderate or severe intensity affects over half of patients with advanced cancer and remains undertreated in at least one-third of these patients. Aim: The aim of this study was to provide a pragmatic overview of the evidence supporting the use of interventions in pain management in advanced cancer and to identify where encouraging preliminary results are demonstrated but further research is required. Design: A scoping review approach was used to examine the evidence supporting the use of guideline-recommended interventions in pain management practice. Data sources: National or international guidelines were selected if they described pain management in adult cancer patients and were written within the last 5 years in English. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 2014 to January 2019) was searched for ‘cancer’ AND ‘pain’ in the title, abstract or keywords. A MEDLINE search was also made. Results: A strong opioid remains the drug of choice for treating moderate or severe pain. Bisphosphonates and radiotherapy are also effective for cancer-related bone pain. Optimal management requires a tailored approach, support for self-management and review of treatment outcomes. There is likely a role for non-pharmacological approaches. Paracetamol should not be used in patients taking a strong opioid to treat pain. Cannabis-based medicines are not recommended. Weak opioids, ketamine and lidocaine are indicated in specific situations only. Conclusion: Interventions commonly recommended by guidelines are not always supported by a robust evidence base. Research is required to evaluate the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-convulsants, anti-depressants, corticosteroids, some invasive anaesthetic techniques, complementary therapies and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.