This article discusses the history of maritime theft, or piracy, in medieval Europe, not so much as a crime but rather as a case study in legal pluralism: the operation of competing systems of law across a common region. Although scholarship has often interpreted sources for medieval European piracy through the filter of early modern conditions, the parameters of how disputes over piracy were settled within the conflicting legal systems of medieval Europe may have heuristic implications for understanding twenty-first century piracy. On the one hand, statutes of royal and civic polities across medieval Europe uniformly adhered to Roman legal precedents in condemning piracy as a capital crime. On the other hand, selective campaigns of maritime predation, referred to in the Latin sources as sailing ad piraticam or in cursum, (hence the term corsair), were sanctioned by medieval European polities when directed against political and economic rivals. Legal and narrative sources for maritime theft nevertheless indicate that piracy was often conflated with the operation of enemy corsairs in a manner that carried implications for the imposition of capital penalties on maritime marauders as well as for merchants who attempted to obtain compensation, or restitution, for cargo seized in a corsair raid from polities charged with authorizing their operations. Attempts to obtain restitution could also be complicated by commercial patterns subtly interwoven with maritime theft.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.