BackgroundDifficulties in coping with stress and regulating emotions are transdiagnostic risk factors for self‐harming behavior. Due to sociocultural stressors, ethnic minority adolescents may be at greater risk for self‐regulation difficulties and self‐harm. Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT‐A) frames adaptive skill acquisition as a mechanism of change, but few studies have investigated its impact on ethnic minority adolescents’ self‐regulation (i.e. coping, emotion regulation). Therefore, this pilot study examined relations between self‐regulation and self‐harm among ethnic minority adolescents and investigated changes in their self‐regulation upon completing DBT‐A.MethodsA clinically referred sample of 101 ethnic minority adolescents (Mage = 14.77; female = 69.3%) completed questionnaires about a history of self‐harm, coping (DBT Ways of Coping Checklist), and emotion regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale). Of the initial sample, 51 adolescents (Mage = 14.73; female = 80.4%) entered a 20‐week DBT‐A program due to self‐harm and/or Borderline Personality features.ResultsIn a pretreatment sample, the frequency of dysfunctional coping, but not of adaptive coping, differentiated self‐injurers from non‐self‐injurers. Full information maximum likelihood estimation was used to address high attrition (60.8%) from DBT‐A. Those who completed DBT‐A (n = 20) reported significantly improved emotion regulation. Adaptive coping at pretreatment predicted increased DBT skills use at post‐treatment.ConclusionsThis non‐randomized pilot study highlights dysfunctional coping and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for self‐harm and suggests that 20‐week DBT‐A may help improve emotion regulation. Future research should employ a randomized design to further examine the effect of DBT‐A on these transdiagnostic processes of psychopathology.Key Practitioner Message
Due to cultural and environmental stressors, ethnic minority adolescents may be at greater risk for developing self‐regulatory difficulties – transdiagnostic mechanisms known to underly self‐harming behaviors; however, we know little about whether empirically supported treatments for self‐harm will improve youth’s coping and emotion regulation.
In a clinically referred, pretreatment sample of ethnic minority youth, levels of BPD symptomatology, emotion dysregulation, and dysfunctional coping, but not of adaptive coping, differentiated teens who self‐harmed from those who did not.
Self‐harming ethnic minority youth who participated in an uncontrolled, pilot trial of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT‐A) at an urban mental health clinic reported improved emotion regulation at post‐treatment.
Baseline emotion regulation skills were not predictive of treatment‐related changes, suggesting that other factors, such as DBT‐A, may have played a decisive role in improving teens’ emotion regulation. In contrast, adaptive coping skills at pretreatment were linked to increased DBT skills use at post‐treatment, indicating that patients’ baseline coping skills may play a predictive role in psychotherapy outcomes.
Future research should employ a randomized control trial to examine the effect of DBT‐A on vulnerable ethnic minority youth’s development of self‐regulation. It should also investigate the hypothesized mediating role of self‐regulation in effecting lasting clinical gains.
Objective: To test whether parental factors including internalizing symptoms, parenting style, and confidence in assisting with remote learning conferred risk/resilience for children with/without ADHD’s learning and emotional outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: 291 parents of children (ages 6–13; n = 180 males) with ( n = 148) and without ADHD completed questionnaires online (April–July 2020). Results: Structural equation modeling identified parental risk/resilience factors. Across groups, risk predicted greater difficulties with learning, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, while parent confidence in educating their child predicted better outcomes. A positive association was observed between parental involvement and child difficulties, which was stronger in families of children with ADHD. Children with/without ADHD did not differ in remote learning difficulties. Conclusion: Parent factors impacted child emotional and learning outcomes during the pandemic. With increases in remote learning practices, there is a need for improved understanding of how parent factors impact outcomes of children with/without ADHD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.