Andexanet alfa is a recombinant factor Xa decoy protein, designed to reverse bleeding associated with oral anti-Xa agents. Andexanet alfa is also reported to neutralize the effects of heparin-related drugs. This study focused on the neutralization profiles of unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, and, a chemically synthetic pentasaccharide, fondaparinux by andexanet alfa. Whole blood clotting studies were carried out using thromboelastography (TEG) and activated clotting time (ACT). The anticoagulant profile of UFH, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux was studied using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), and amidolytic anti-Xa, and anti-IIa methods. Thrombin generation inhibition was studied using the calibrated automated thrombogram system. Reversal of each of these agents was studied by supplementing andexanet alfa at 100 µg/mL. In the TEG, andexanet alfa produced almost a complete reversal of the anticoagulant effects of UFH and enoxaparin; however, it augmented the effects of fondaparinux. In the ACT, aPTT, and TT, UFH produced strong anticoagulant effects that were almost completely neutralized by andexanet alfa. Enoxaparin produced milder anticoagulant responses that were partially neutralized, whereas fondaparinux did not produce any sizeable effects. In the anti-Xa and anti-IIa assays, UFH exhibited partial neutralization whereas enoxaparin and fondaparinux did not show any neutralization. All agents produced varying degrees of the inhibition of thrombin generation, which were differentially neutralized by andexanet alfa. These results indicate that andexanet alfa is capable of differentially neutralizing anticoagulant and antiprotease effects of UFH and enoxaparin in an assay-dependent manner. However, andexanet alfa is incapable of neutralizing the anti-Xa effects of fondaparinux.
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCARS) characterized by fever and mucocutaneous lesions leading to necrosis and sloughing of the epidermis. Conjunctival lesions are reported in 85% of patients. The pathogenesis of SJS/TEN/SCARS is not completely understood. It is hypothesized that IL-13, IL-15 and Granulysin expressed in plasma and skin may play a role. We measured the circulating levels of these cytokines in the plasma using ELISA and their expression in the skin using immunofluorescence microscopy. A total of 12 SJS/TEN skin biopsy samples (8 SJS, 2 SJS/TEN overlap and 2 TEN) were analyzed. Biopsy samples from patients with Lichen Planus (an inflammatory condition of the skin and mucous membranes) served as controls. Studies were also performed in human corneal epithelial cells where expression of these cytokines were measured following a challenge with TNF-α (0, 1, 10 and 100 ng/ml). The intensity of immunofluorescence was measured Using Imaris® software. The results showed significantly increased expression of these cytokines in the skin biopsy samples as measured by the average intensities of IL-13 (6.1 x 133.0 ± 4.231 x 10^8), and Granulysin (4.2 x 123.0 ± 4.231 x 10^8) compared to Lichen planus control (3.0 x 123.0 ±1.62 x 10^5). Increased expression of IL-13 and IL-15 were noted in cell culture studies and in the plasma samples when compared to Normal Human Plasma as controls. It is concluded that IL-13, IL-15 and Granulysin play a role in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN.
The complex pathophysiology of pulmonary embolism (PE) involves hemostatic activation, inflammatory processes, cellular dysfunction, and hemodynamic derangements. Due to the heterogeneity of this disease, risk stratification and diagnosis remains challenging. Biochip-array technology provides an integrated high throughput method for analyzing blood plasma samples for the simultaneous measurement of multiple biomarkers for potential risk stratification. Using biochip-array method, this study aimed to quantify the inflammatory biomarkers such as interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in 109 clinically confirmed PE patients in comparison to the control group comprised of plasma samples collected from 48 healthy subjects. Cytokines IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1β, and MCP-1 demonstrated varying level of significant increase ( P < 0.05) in massive-risk PE patients compared to submassive- and low-risk PE patients. The upregulation of inflammatory cytokines in PE patients observed in this study suggest that inflammation plays an important role in the overall pathophysiology of this disease. The application of biochip-array technology may provide a useful approach to evaluate these biomarkers to understand the pathogenesis and risk stratification of PE patients.
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of thrombotic complications in lymphoma patients ranges from 1.5% up to 59.5%. Lymphoma patients have a 10-fold higher risk for the development of venous thrombosis than patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancers. The pathogenesis of thromboembolic disease in hematological malignancies is complex and multifactorial and can be due to the underlying disorder or related to therapy. A number of biomarkers are associated with the occurence of VTE in cancer patients. Biomarkers reflect activation of coagulation and increased inflammatory potential. This study aimed to profile hemostatic and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/ small lymphocytic lymphoma. METHODS: Citrated plasma samples were collected from lymphoma patients (n=96) under an IRB approved protocol Clinic for hematology, Lymphoma Center, University of Belgrade in Serbia. Samples were shipped to Loyola University Chicago and analyzed in batches via commercially available ELISA kits to profile biomarkers of coagulation activation and inflammation. Markers in Coagulation Activation: von Willebrand Factor (vWF), Factor XIIIa, Protein S, β2Glycoprotein I (β2GPI), D-dimer, Microparticles (MP), Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Antigen (uPA), Fibronectin. Markers of Inflammation included: Human Tumor Necrosis Factor- α (TNF- α), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type 1 (PAI-1). The lymphoma patient population for each biomarker was compared to normal human pooled plasma (repeated 3 times for each biomarker), which consisted of 25 male and 25 females. RESULTS: The mean patients' age was 56 years (range, 19-80 years); 52.4% were males. Most patients were newly diagnosed and had advanced stage disease. A total of 42 patients (43.8%) had high-grade NHL; 17 (17.7%) had low-grade NHL; 24 (25.0%) had HLL; 7(7.3%) had HL; 6 (6.3%) had other forms. Lymphoma patients had significantly dysregulated following markers of coagulation: vWF, β2GPI, D-dimer, MP, uPA, and Fibronectin (Figure 1) (p<0.001 for all in comparison to controls). TNF-α and CRP as markers of inflammation were also significantly increased in lymphoma patients (Figure 1) (p<0.001 for both in comparison to controls). In lymphoma population 12 patients had thrombosis. Patients with thrombosis had significantly higher Factor XIIIa in comparison to lymphoma patients without thrombosis (106±9 vs. 85±256; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Hemostatic dysregulation and inflammation is present in lymphoma patients, which may reflect increased thrombogenic potential. Further studies are required to link clinical data and biomarker levels, with special emphasis on the involvement of FXIII in the development of thrombotic events in lymphoma patients. Biomarker profiling of lymphoma patients will also help in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the observed thrombotic complications and differentiating the sub-groups. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Background : Sepsis is characterized by a simultaneous activation of inflammation and hemostasis in response to microbial infection. This systemic inflammatory response is due to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, pro-coagulants and adhesion molecules from immune cells and/or damaged endothelial tissue. Simultaneous activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis leads to consumption coagulopathy and severe vascular dysfunction. Profiling of biomarkers of hemostatic activation and inflammation along with the measurement of coagulation parameters has provided useful data in the understanding of the pathogenesis of sepsis. This study was designed to profile biomarkers of hemostatic activation, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction along with the measurement of coagulation parameters in a defined clinically confirmed sepsis population in conjunction with an IRB approved clinical trial. Materials & Methods: Citrated blood samples were collected from sepsis patients with suspected or confirmed infection, and organ dysfunction as defined by a SOFA ³ baseline. Plasma samples from septic shock patients were collected in citrated tubes within 72 hours of ICU admission under an IRB approved protocol in conjunction with an ongoing trial at the University of Utah and Veteran's Affair FFC Health Care System VAMC. Normal controls were comprised of commercially available 25 male and 25 female citrated plasma samples (George King Biomedical, Overland Park, Kansas City). Such biomarkers as CRP, PAI-1, D-Dimer, vWF and microparticle tissue factor complex (MP-TF) were measured using a commercially available sandwich ELISA methods. Nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured using a commercially available Griess reaction based colorimetric method. PT/INR, aPTT and fibrinogen measurements were based on clot based assays. All results were compiled as mean ± SD and SEM. Correlation analysis was carried out to determine relevance between different parameters. Results: Most of the biomarkers of hemostatic activation and inflammation were elevated in patients with sepsis as shown on table 1a, CRP (66 fold) and D-Dimer (23 fold) showed the most pronounced increase in comparison to the control. Other parameters also showed increase levels including MP-TF (5.3 fold), PAI-1 (3.5 fold), vWF (3.1 fold) and NO (3.0 fold). Clotting parameters such as PT/INR (2.0 fold), aPTT (2.5 fold) and fibrinogen (2.0 fold) were also significantly elevated in the sepsis patients. These differences were significant (p value ≤0.0009) for all of the parameters except for NO (p value 0.0937) and fibrinogen (p value 0.4694). As shown on table 1b, there was no correlation between various biomarkers and fibrinogen in the sepsis patients. Summary & Conclusion: In comparison to the control group, the sepsis patients showed wide variations in all of the parameters investigated in this study. The marked prolongation of PT and aPTT are suggestive of both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathway defects and consumption of clotting factors. The aPTT data showed wider scatter in comparison to PT data. The fibrinogen levels were also elevated and nearly 1/3 of the patients showed >1000 mg/dL levels. The markedly higher level of CRP in the sepsis group are indicative of severe inflammatory response. Marked elevation of D-Dimer is indicative of endogenous fibrin formation and its consumption consistent with activation of secondary fibrinolysis. MP-TF, vWF and PAI-1 were also increased in the sepsis patients suggesting marked endothelial dysfunction. This is consistent with increased NO levels which may be due to induction of iNOS in the endothelial lining of sepsis patients. These results further underscore the multifactorial pathophysiology of sepsis which results in the dysregulation of hemostasis, upregulation of inflammatory responses and generalized endothelialopathy. Profiling of the biomarkers included in this study and coagulation parameters may be helpful in the risk stratification and clinical management of patients with sepsis and related disorders. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.