Background More than half of the hospitalized older adults discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) have more than three geriatric syndromes. Pharmacotherapy may be contributing to geriatric syndromes in this population. Objectives Develop a list of medications associated with geriatric syndromes and describe their prevalence in patients discharged from acute care to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) Design Literature review and multidisciplinary expert panel discussion, followed by cross-sectional analysis. Setting Academic Medical Center in the United States Participants 154 hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries discharged to SNFs Measurements Development of a list of medications that are associated with six geriatric syndromes. Prevalence of the medications associated with geriatric syndromes was examined in the hospital discharge sample. Results A list of 513 medications was developed as potentially contributing to 6 geriatric syndromes: cognitive impairment, delirium, falls, reduced appetite or weight loss, urinary incontinence, and depression. Medications included 18 categories. Antiepileptics were associated with all syndromes while antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiparkinsonism and opioid agonists were associated with 5 geriatric syndromes. In the prevalence sample, patients were discharged to SNFs with an overall average of 14.0 (±4.7) medications, including an average of 5.9 (±2.2) medications that could contribute to geriatric syndromes, with falls having the most associated medications at discharge, 5.5 (±2.2). Conclusions Many commonly prescribed medications are associated with geriatric syndromes. Over 40% of all medications ordered upon discharge to SNFs were associated with geriatric syndromes and could be contributing to the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes experienced by this population.

Background Hospital readmissions from skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are common. Previous research has not examined how assessments of avoidable readmissions differ between hospital and SNF perspectives. Objectives To determine the percentage of readmissions from post-acute care that are considered potentially avoidable from hospital and SNF perspectives. Design Prospective cohort study Setting One academic medical center and 23 SNFs. Participants We included patients from a quality improvement trial aimed at reducing hospital readmissions among patients discharged to SNFs. We included Medicare patients who were discharged to one of 23 regional SNFs between January 2013 and January 2015, and readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. Measurements Hospital-based physicians and SNF-based staff performed structured root-cause analyses (RCA) on a sample of readmissions from a participating SNF to the index hospital. RCAs reported avoidability and factors contributing to readmissions. Results The 30-day unplanned readmission rate to the index hospital from SNFs was 14.5% (262 hospital readmissions of 1808 discharges). 120 readmissions had RCA from both the hospital and SNF. The percentage of readmissions rated as potentially avoidable was 30.0% and 13.3% according to hospital and SNF staff, respectively. Hospital and SNF ratings of potential avoidability agreed for 73.3% (88 of the 120 readmissions), but readmission factors varied between settings. Diagnostic problems and improved management of changes in conditions were the most common avoidable readmission factors by hospitals and SNFs, respectively. Conclusions A substantial percentage of hospital readmissions from SNFs are rated as potentially avoidable. The ratings and factors underlying avoidability differ between hospital and SNF staff. These data support the need for joint accountability and collaboration for future readmission reduction efforts between hospitals and their SNF partners.

Background: The American Board of Cosmetic Surgery (ABCS) offers a certification process for physicians desiring third-party credentials in aesthetic surgery. This study aims to examine the training backgrounds and scope of practice of ABCS-certified physicians. Methods: The ABCS online directory was used to identify diplomates. Additional board certifications were identified using the American Board of Medical Specialties physician database. Scope of training was defined using American Council for Graduate Medical Education or Commission on Dental Accreditation requirements for residency training programs. Scope of practice was determined using ABCS physician profiles and professional websites. Results: Three hundred forty-two ABCS-certified physicians were included in the study. Two-hundred twelve (60.2 percent) also held American Board of Medical Specialties board certifications. Over half (62.6 percent) of ABCS diplomates advertised surgical operations beyond the scope of their American Council for Graduate Medical Education or Commission on Dental Accreditation training. Specialties with the highest prevalence of practicing beyond scope of training were internal medicine [n = 2 (100 percent)], general surgery [n = 69 (95.8 percent)], obstetrics and gynecology [n = 17 (85 percent)], otolaryngology [n = 65 (59.1 percent)], dermatology [n = 16 (51.6 percent)], and oral and maxillofacial surgery [n = 30 (50 percent)]. The most commonly offered out-of-scope procedures were liposuction (59.6 percent), abdominoplasty (50.0 percent), breast augmentation (49.7 percent), and buttock augmentation (36.5 percent). Conclusions: ABCS–certified physicians include internists and dermatologists, who market themselves as board-certified cosmetic surgeons, and the majority of ABCS members perform complex aesthetic procedures outside the scope of their primary residency training. Patients who rely on ABCS certification when selecting a cosmetic surgeon may not understand the scope of that physician’s training experience and qualifications.