The validity of the Spontaneously Hypertensive rat (SHR) as a model for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is explored by comparing the SHR with Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and Wistar rats in a number of different tests. In the open field, SHR are hyperactive compared to both Wistar and WKY, but only at specific ages. At those ages, methylphenidate (1mg/kg) did not attenuate hyperactivity. Subsequently, a dose response study of methylphenidate (0.1-10mg/kg) was conducted in the Differential Reinforcement of Low-rate responding (DRL)-72s and five-choice serial reaction time tests (5-CSRTT). Compared to WKY but not Wistar rats, SHR performed worse on the DRL-72s. Performance was not improved by methylphenidate (0.1-1.0mg/kg). In the 5-CSRTT, attentional performance was similar for all rat strains, but Wistar rats made more impulsive responses than both the SHR and the WKY. Methylphenidate only attenuated impulsivity in Wistar rats. Because SHR do not consistently display symptoms of ADHD across the different tests, and methylphenidate effects were observed in both WKY and Wistar rats, but not in SHR, we conclude that SHR is not a representative animal model for ADHD.

Impulsivity is an important symptom of many psychiatric disorders, and can be divided into two subtypes: response inhibition deficits and delay aversion. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between delay aversion and response inhibition, both to each other and to locomotion, extinction of conditioned responses, sexual behaviour, and aggressive behaviour. To that end, we quantified the behaviour of 24 rats in several tests. To measure response inhibition, rats were trained in a stop-signal task. In this operant task, rats were rewarded food if they inhibited execution of a response after presentation of an audible stop-signal. Delay aversion was measured in an operant task in which rats made a choice between a small, immediately available reward and a large reward available after a delay. The results showed that delay aversion and response inhibition were independent. Responses during extinction and various measures of aggressive behaviour were positively correlated to delay aversion. The speed of go-trials in the stop-task was correlated to non-aggressive behaviour. We conclude that the role of response inhibition in various behaviours is small, but delay aversion in particular contributes to several other behaviours, such as aggressive behaviour and extinction.

No abstract