AIP patients with IgG4 seropositivity and jaundice are at a higher risk of relapse and they could therefore be candidates for over 3 years of maintenance CST. AIP patients with IgG4 seronegativity have a high likelihood of SR.

Background and Aim: Proton pump inhibitors are effective for the treatment of gastric ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the most excellent therapy is controversial. Vonoprazan, an active potassium-competitive acid blocker, has a strong gastric acid secretion inhibitory effect, but its efficacy for the treatment of post-ESD gastric ulcers is unclear. Herein, we aimed to determine the healing effect of vonoprazan on post-ESD gastric ulcers. Methods:We carried out a prospective randomized controlled trial examining 92 patients who had undergone ESD for the treatment of gastric neoplasms between April 2015 and June 2016 at Machida Municipal Hospital. Patients were treated with 20 mg/day vonoprazan (V group) or 20 mg/day esomeprazole (E group) for 8 weeks. We evaluated the 8-week cure rate for artificial ulcers and any complications after ESD.Results: A total of 80 patients (median age, 73.5 years; 71.3% male) were analyzed. Cure rate for the V group was significantly higher than that for the E group (94.9% [37/39] vs 78.0% [32/41], respectively; P = 0.049). In a multivariate analysis, only vonoprazan was correlated with ulcer healing (odds ratio = 6.33; 95% CI = 1.21-33.20; P = 0.029). Delayed bleeding was experienced only in the E group (7.3% [3/41]), but no significant difference compared with the V group was observed (P = 0.241). Conclusion:Vonoprazan was significantly superior to esomeprazole for the healing of post-ESD gastric ulcers and should be considered as a treatment of first choice.

The varix formation is an independent predictor of the development of ACF. A pooled analysis indicated that the disease process might be irreversible in AIP patients with large cystic lesions exceeding 55 mm in diameter and those patients tended to show a refractory course even if CST were conducted.

Background and Aim: Diverticular hemorrhage is the common cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and its incidence has been increasing in Japan. However, the exact cause of diverticular hemorrhage is not well understood. We investigated the risk factors for diverticular hemorrhage. Methods: We selected 103 patients with diverticular hemorrhage as cases and patients with colonic diverticulosis without a history of bleeding were selected as control subjects, exactly matched for age and gender. We collected the data from the medical records of each of the patients, such as those related to the comorbidities, medications and findings of colonoscopy, and conducted a matched case-control study to analyze the risk factors for diverticular hemorrhage. Results: Both groups were composed of 75 men and 28 women. The median age of the patients in both groups was 72.0 years (47.0–87.0). The body weight (p = 0.0065), body mass index (p = 0.006), prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.0242), prevalence of ischemic heart disease (p = 0.0015), and frequency of use of low-dose aspirin (p = 0.042) were significantly different between the two groups. The percentage of patients with bilateral diverticula, that is, diverticula on both the right and left hemicolon, was significantly higher in the diverticular hemorrhage group (p = 0.0011). Multiple regression analysis identified only the diverticular location as being significantly associated with the risk of diverticular hemorrhage (p = 0.0021). Conclusions: Only the diverticular location (bilateral) was found to be an independent risk factor for diverticular hemorrhage.