Genome editing in plants has advanced greatly by applying the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs)-Cas system, especially CRISPR-Cas9. However, CRISPR type I—the most abundant CRISPR system in bacteria—has not been exploited for plant genome modification. In type I CRISPR-Cas systems, e.g., type I-E, Cas3 nucleases degrade the target DNA in mammals. Here, we present a type I-D (TiD) CRISPR-Cas genome editing system in plants. TiD lacks the Cas3 nuclease domain; instead, Cas10d is the functional nuclease in vivo. TiD was active in targeted mutagenesis of tomato genomic DNA. The mutations generated by TiD differed from those of CRISPR/Cas9; both bi-directional long-range deletions and short indels mutations were detected in tomato cells. Furthermore, TiD can be used to efficiently generate bi-allelic mutant plants in the first generation. These findings indicate that TiD is a unique CRISPR system that can be used for genome engineering in plants.

Adoption of CRISPR–Cas systems, such as CRISPR–Cas9 and CRISPR–Cas12a, has revolutionized genome engineering in recent years; however, application of genome editing with CRISPR type I—the most abundant CRISPR system in bacteria—remains less developed. Type I systems, such as type I-E, and I-F, comprise the CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense (‘Cascade’: Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8 and the small subunit) and Cas3, which degrades the target DNA; in contrast, for the sub-type CRISPR–Cas type I-D, which lacks a typical Cas3 nuclease in its CRISPR locus, the mechanism of target DNA degradation remains unknown. Here, we found that Cas10d is a functional nuclease in the type I-D system, performing the role played by Cas3 in other CRISPR–Cas type I systems. The type I-D system can be used for targeted mutagenesis of genomic DNA in human cells, directing both bi-directional long-range deletions and short insertions/deletions. Our findings suggest the CRISPR–Cas type I-D system as a unique effector pathway in CRISPR that can be repurposed for genome engineering in eukaryotic cells.

Adoption of the CRISPR-Cas system has revolutionized genome engineering in recent years; however, application of genome editing with CRISPR type I-the most abundant CRISPR system in bacteriahas been less developed. Type I systems in which Cas3 nuclease degrades the target DNA are known; in contrast, for the sub-type CRISPR type I-D (TiD), which lacks a typical Cas3 nuclease in its cascade, the mechanism of target DNA degradation remains unknown. Here, we found that Cas10d-a nuclease in TiD-is multi-functional in PAM recognition, stabilization and target DNA degradation. TiD can be used for targeted mutagenesis of genomic DNA in human cells, directing both bi-directional long-range deletions and short insertions/deletions. TiD off-target effects, which were dependent on the mismatch position in the protospacer of TiD, were also identified. Our findings suggest TiD as a unique effector pathway in CRISPR that can be repurposed for genome engineering in eukaryotic cells.

A human protein heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein U (hnRNP U) also known as Scaffold attachment factor A (SAF-A) and its orthologous rat protein SP120 are abundant and multifunctional nuclear protein that directly binds to both DNA and RNA. The C-terminal region of hnRNP U enriched with arginine and glycine is essential for the interaction with RNA and the N-terminal region of SAF-A termed SAP domain has been ascribed to the DNA binding. We have reported that rat hnRNP U specifically and cooperatively binds to AT-rich DNA called nuclear scaffold/matrix-associated region (S/MAR) although its detailed mechanism remained unclear. In the present study analysis of hnRNP U deletion mutants revealed for the first time that a C-terminal domain enriched with Arg-Gly (defined here as ‘RG domain’) is predominantly important for the S/MAR-selective DNA binding activities. RG domain alone directly bound to S/MAR and coexistence with the SAP domain exerted a synergistic effect. The binding was inhibited by netropsin, a minor groove binder with preference to AT pairs that are enriched in S/MAR, suggesting that RG domain interacts with minor groove of S/MAR DNA. Interestingly, excess amounts of RNA attenuated the RG domain-dependent S/MAR-binding of hnRNP U. Taken together, hnRNP U may be the key element for the RNA-regulated recognition of S/MAR DNA and thus contributing to the dynamic structural changes of chromatin compartments.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01771-5